Continuous phenotypic modulation explains male horn allometry in three dung beetle species.

Alex Laini, Angela Roggero, Claudia Palestrini, Antonio Rolando
Author Information
  1. Alex Laini: Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123, Turin, Italy.
  2. Angela Roggero: Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123, Turin, Italy. angela.roggero@unito.it.
  3. Claudia Palestrini: Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123, Turin, Italy.
  4. Antonio Rolando: Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Via Accademia Albertina 13, 10123, Turin, Italy.

Abstract

Many dung beetle species show male horn polyphenism, the ability of males to develop into distinct phenotypes without intermediate forms as a response to the larval growth environment. While males with long (majors) and rudimentary (minor) horn have been widely reported in literature, little is known about the existence of individuals with intermediate horn length. Here we investigate the occurrence of intermediates in natural populations of three dung beetle species (Onthophagus furcatus, Copris lunaris and C. hispanus). We analysed the body size-horn length relationship using linear, exponential, and sigmoidal models with different error structures. We inferred the number of individuals in the minor, intermediate, and major groups by combining changepoint analysis and simulation from fitted allometric models. The sigmoidal equation was a better descriptor of the body size-horn length relationship than linear or exponential equations in all the three studied species. Our results indicated that the number of intermediates equals or exceeds the number of minor and major males. This work provides evidence that, at least in the studied species, males with intermediate horn length exist in natural populations. For similar cases we therefore suggest that continuous phenotypic modulation rather than discrete polyphenism can explain variation in male horn allometry.

References

  1. Am Nat. 2005 Mar;165(3):389-402 [PMID: 15729668]
  2. Evol Dev. 2003 May-Jun;5(3):259-68 [PMID: 12752765]
  3. Annu Rev Entomol. 2000;45:661-708 [PMID: 10761593]
  4. BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Jul 23;12:118 [PMID: 22823456]
  5. Insects. 2018 Aug 22;9(3): [PMID: 30135396]
  6. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2017 Feb;19:52-60 [PMID: 28521943]
  7. Evolution. 2009 Feb;63(2):459-68 [PMID: 19154360]
  8. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2021;141:279-336 [PMID: 33602491]
  9. Am Nat. 2013 Jul;182(1):13-27 [PMID: 23778223]
  10. Science. 2001 Feb 23;291(5508):1534-6 [PMID: 11222856]
  11. Anim Behav. 2000 Feb;59(2):459-466 [PMID: 10675268]
  12. Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Mar 7;272(1562):543-51 [PMID: 15799950]
  13. Am Nat. 2005 Oct;166 Suppl 4:S42-68 [PMID: 16224711]
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 31;103(44):16346-51 [PMID: 17053078]
  15. Nat Commun. 2017 Nov 17;8(1):1671 [PMID: 29150615]
  16. J Theor Biol. 1977 Apr 7;65(3):579-90 [PMID: 859349]

MeSH Term

Animals
Body Size
Coleoptera
Larva
Male
Phenotype