Evidence-based recommendations for communicating the impacts of climate change on health.

Ellen Peters, Patrick Boyd, Linda D Cameron, Noshir Contractor, Michael A Diefenbach, Sara Fleszar-Pavlovic, Ezra Markowitz, Renee N Salas, Keri K Stephens
Author Information
  1. Ellen Peters: Center for Science Communication Research, School of Journalism and Communication, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, USA. ORCID
  2. Patrick Boyd: Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA. ORCID
  3. Linda D Cameron: Department of Psychological Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA, USA. ORCID
  4. Noshir Contractor: Departments of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Management and Organizations, and Communication Studies, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. ORCID
  5. Michael A Diefenbach: Institute for Health System Science at the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
  6. Sara Fleszar-Pavlovic: Department of Psychological Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA, USA.
  7. Ezra Markowitz: Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
  8. Renee N Salas: Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
  9. Keri K Stephens: Technology & Information Policy Institute, Communication Studies, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. ORCID

Abstract

Climate change poses a multifaceted, complex, and existential threat to human health and well-being, but efforts to communicate these threats to the public lag behind what we know how to do in communication research. Effective communication about climate change's health risks can improve a wide variety of individual and population health-related outcomes by: (1) helping people better make the connection between climate change and health risks and (2) empowering them to act on that newfound knowledge and understanding. The aim of this manuscript is to highlight communication methods that have received empirical support for improving knowledge uptake and/or driving higher-quality decision making and healthier behaviors and to recommend how to apply them at the intersection of climate change and health. This expert consensus about effective communication methods can be used by healthcare professionals, decision makers, governments, the general public, and other stakeholders including sectors outside of health. In particular, we argue for the use of 11 theory-based, evidence-supported communication strategies and practices. These methods range from leveraging social networks to making careful choices about the use of language, narratives, emotions, visual images, and statistics. Message testing with appropriate groups is also key. When implemented properly, these approaches are likely to improve the outcomes of climate change and health communication efforts.

Keywords

References

  1. Transl Behav Med. 2022 May 25;12(4):535-543 [PMID: 35613003]
  2. PLoS Biol. 2018 Oct 9;16(10):e2006720 [PMID: 30300354]
  3. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):905-12 [PMID: 27273839]
  4. Vaccine. 2017 Aug 3;35(34):4295-4297 [PMID: 28673483]
  5. Health Psychol. 2020 Aug;39(8):721-730 [PMID: 32496078]
  6. Lancet. 2021 Oct 30;398(10311):1619-1662 [PMID: 34687662]
  7. Subst Use Misuse. 2004;39(10-12):1571-623 [PMID: 15587946]
  8. Risk Anal. 2004 Apr;24(2):311-22 [PMID: 15078302]
  9. Public Underst Sci. 2013 Oct;22(7):785-98 [PMID: 23825290]
  10. Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Dec;42:120-125 [PMID: 34280794]
  11. Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Apr;64(2):169-90 [PMID: 17406019]
  12. Int J Psychol. 2012;47(5):325-34 [PMID: 22452746]
  13. Emotion. 2005 Dec;5(4):489-97 [PMID: 16366752]
  14. Heliyon. 2020 Sep;6(9):e04965 [PMID: 32964165]
  15. Emotion. 2006 Feb;6(1):40-61 [PMID: 16637749]
  16. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Nov;79(5):701-21 [PMID: 11079236]
  17. N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 22;381(8):773-774 [PMID: 31433926]
  18. Nat Commun. 2019 May 7;10(1):2095 [PMID: 31064982]
  19. Environ Res Lett. 2017 Nov;12(11): [PMID: 33204303]
  20. Health Educ Behav. 2000 Oct;27(5):591-615 [PMID: 11009129]
  21. Risk Anal. 2014 May;34(5):937-48 [PMID: 24219420]
  22. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 17;380(3):263-273 [PMID: 30650330]
  23. Front Public Health. 2020 Sep 24;8:569353 [PMID: 33072704]
  24. Front Psychol. 2019 May 07;10:1026 [PMID: 31133941]
  25. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004 Aug;29(7):953-60 [PMID: 15177712]
  26. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul;7(4):325-40 [PMID: 26168470]
  27. Health Commun. 2014;29(4):398-409 [PMID: 23829343]
  28. J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009 Sep;15(3):213-27 [PMID: 19751072]
  29. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jul;34(7):913-23 [PMID: 18550863]
  30. Am J Public Health. 2004 Aug;94(8):1442-5 [PMID: 15284057]
  31. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4:13650-7 [PMID: 25225373]
  32. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 16;111 Suppl 4:13598-605 [PMID: 25225380]
  33. Science. 2016 Oct 21;354(6310):321-326 [PMID: 27846564]
  34. Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 22;9(1):4939 [PMID: 30467311]
  35. Hastings Cent Rep. 2011 Mar-Apr;41(2):30-9 [PMID: 21495515]
  36. PLoS One. 2011 Mar 10;6(3):e17571 [PMID: 21423743]
  37. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033538 [PMID: 33404615]
  38. Ann Behav Med. 2019 Mar 20;53(4):358-371 [PMID: 29947729]
  39. BMJ. 2011 Oct 17;343:d6386 [PMID: 22006953]
  40. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 26;10(3):e0120985 [PMID: 25812121]
  41. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2117115 [PMID: 34259846]
  42. Public Underst Sci. 2016 May;25(4):400-14 [PMID: 27117768]
  43. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7670-7675 [PMID: 30478063]
  44. Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2012 Dec;46(4):440-56 [PMID: 23065375]
  45. Health Educ Behav. 2007 Oct;34(5):777-92 [PMID: 17200094]
  46. Geohealth. 2018 Sep 24;2(9):262-275 [PMID: 32159018]
  47. Ann Behav Med. 2015 Aug;49(4):594-604 [PMID: 25697134]
  48. Health Psychol Rev. 2018 Dec;12(4):357-381 [PMID: 29902949]
  49. Health Commun. 2016;31(1):60-71 [PMID: 25668744]
  50. Psychosom Med. 1981 Aug;43(4):343-64 [PMID: 7280162]
  51. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jan 18;154(2):77-84 [PMID: 21242364]
  52. N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 9;385(11):967-969 [PMID: 34407333]
  53. Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Dec;39(12):2175-2181 [PMID: 33284709]
  54. Tob Control. 2016 May;25(3):341-54 [PMID: 25948713]
  55. Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):429-34 [PMID: 17576283]
  56. N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 17;383(12):e77 [PMID: 32706952]
  57. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Aug;121(2):215-238 [PMID: 34516184]
  58. Med Decis Making. 2014 May;34(4):430-42 [PMID: 24246563]
  59. Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 17;7:1780 [PMID: 27909415]
  60. Risk Anal. 2018 Mar;38(3):585-602 [PMID: 28767136]
  61. Am Psychol. 1994 Aug;49(8):709-24 [PMID: 8092614]
  62. J Commun. 2013 Feb;63(1): [PMID: 24347679]
  63. Health Commun. 2019 Mar;34(3):333-342 [PMID: 29236552]
  64. Health Psychol. 1999 Sep;18(5):532-6 [PMID: 10519469]
  65. BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):1079 [PMID: 31455278]
  66. PLoS One. 2015 Dec 16;10(12):e0142879 [PMID: 26672982]
  67. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jan;6(1): [PMID: 33514594]
  68. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 16;118(46): [PMID: 34725255]
  69. Br J Health Psychol. 2011 Feb;16(Pt 1):72-91 [PMID: 21226785]
  70. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:591-621 [PMID: 14744228]
  71. Risk Anal. 2012 Jun;32(6):1021-32 [PMID: 22486296]
  72. Public Underst Sci. 2014 Oct;23(7):866-83 [PMID: 23825287]
  73. Ann Behav Med. 2018 Apr 19;52(5):429-442 [PMID: 29684135]
  74. J Health Commun. 2013;18(6):740-56 [PMID: 23216010]

MeSH Term

Climate Change
Communication
Emotions
Humans

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthchangecommunicationclimateClimatemethodswell-beingeffortspublicriskscanimproveoutcomesknowledgedecisionmakinguseHealthposesmultifacetedcomplexexistentialthreathumancommunicatethreatslagbehindknowresearchEffectivechange'swidevarietyindividualpopulationhealth-relatedby:1helpingpeoplebettermakeconnection2empoweringactnewfoundunderstandingaimmanuscripthighlightreceivedempiricalsupportimprovinguptakeand/ordrivinghigher-qualityhealthierbehaviorsrecommendapplyintersectionexpertconsensuseffectiveusedhealthcareprofessionalsmakersgovernmentsgeneralstakeholdersincludingsectorsoutsideparticularargue11theory-basedevidence-supportedstrategiespracticesrangeleveragingsocialnetworkscarefulchoiceslanguagenarrativesemotionsvisualimagesstatisticsMessagetestingappropriategroupsalsokeyimplementedproperlyapproacheslikelyEvidence-basedrecommendationscommunicatingimpactsCommunicationdisparitiesPoliticalaction

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)