Carbon dioxide and particulate emissions from the 2013 Tasmanian firestorm: implications for Australian carbon accounting.

Mercy N Ndalila, Grant J Williamson, David M J S Bowman
Author Information
  1. Mercy N Ndalila: School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia. mercy.ndalila@utas.edu.au. ORCID
  2. Grant J Williamson: School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.
  3. David M J S Bowman: School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled wildfires in Australian temperate Eucalyptus forests produce significant smoke emissions, particularly carbon dioxide (CO) and particulates. Emissions from fires in these ecosystems, however, have received less research attention than the fires in North American conifer forests or frequently burned Australian tropical savannas. Here, we use the 2013 Forcett-Dunalley fire that caused the first recorded pyrocumulonimbus event in Tasmania, to understand CO and particulate matter (PM) emissions from a severe Eucalyptus forest fire. We investigate the spatial patterns of the two emissions using a fine scale mapping of vegetation and fire severity (50 m resolution), and utilising available emission factors suitable for Australian vegetation types. We compare the results with coarse-scale (28 km resolution) emissions estimates from Global Fire Emissions Database (GFED) to determine the reliability of the global model in emissions estimation.
RESULTS: The fine scale inventory yielded total CO emission of 1.125 ± 0.232 Tg and PM emission of 0.022 ± 0.006 Tg, representing a loss of 56 t CO ha and 1 t PM ha. The CO emissions were comparable to GFED estimates, but GFED PM estimates were lower by a factor of three. This study highlights the reliability of GFED for CO but not PM for estimating emissions from Eucalyptus forest fires. Our fine scale and GFED estimates showed that the Forcett-Dunalley fire produced 30% of 2013 fire carbon emissions in Tasmania, and 26-36% of mean annual fire emissions for the State, representing a significant single source of emissions.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses highlight the need for improved PM emission factors specific to Australian vegetation, and better characterisation of fuel loads, particularly coarse fuel loads, to quantify wildfire particulate and greenhouse gas emissions more accurately. Current Australian carbon accountancy approach of excluding large wildfires from final GHG accounts likely exaggerates Tasmania's claim to carbon neutrality; we therefore recommend that planned and unplanned emissions are included in the final national and state greenhouse gas accounting to international conventions. Advancing these issues is important given the trajectory of more frequent large fires driven by anthropogenic climate change.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Commun. 2021 Nov 26;12(1):6921 [PMID: 34836974]
  2. Science. 2009 Apr 24;324(5926):481-4 [PMID: 19390038]
  3. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2011 Apr;61(4):390-8 [PMID: 21516934]
  4. Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Sep;5(9):e608-e619 [PMID: 34508682]
  5. Nat Ecol Evol. 2022 May;6(5):536-539 [PMID: 35422478]
  6. Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Mar;20(3):1008-15 [PMID: 24132866]
  7. Nat Commun. 2015 Jul 14;6:7537 [PMID: 26172867]
  8. Environ Manage. 2009 Sep;44(3):430-40 [PMID: 19597866]
  9. Nat Ecol Evol. 2022 May;6(5):533-535 [PMID: 35422479]
  10. J Environ Manage. 2021 Jul 15;290:112568 [PMID: 33887642]
  11. Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jan;25(1):254-268 [PMID: 30270480]
  12. Nat Clim Chang. 2013;3:131-136 [PMID: 25379058]
  13. Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Sep;124(9):1334-43 [PMID: 27082891]
  14. Plant Cell Environ. 2021 Feb;44(2):347-355 [PMID: 33068312]
  15. Environ Health Perspect. 2012 May;120(5):695-701 [PMID: 22456494]
  16. Nature. 2021 Sep;597(7877):459-460 [PMID: 34526688]
  17. Nature. 2021 Sep;597(7876):366-369 [PMID: 34526704]

Grants

  1. LLP130100146/Australian Research Council Linkage Program

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0emissionsAustralianCOfireGFEDcarbonPMEucalyptusfiresemissionestimates2013particulatefinescalevegetationwildfiresforestssignificantparticularlydioxideEmissionsForcett-DunalleyTasmaniaforestresolutionfactorsreliabilityTgrepresentingfuelloadsgreenhousegaslargefinalaccountingCarbonBACKGROUND:UncontrolledtemperateproducesmokeparticulatesecosystemshoweverreceivedlessresearchattentionNorthAmericanconiferfrequentlyburnedtropicalsavannasusecausedfirstrecordedpyrocumulonimbuseventunderstandmattersevereinvestigatespatialpatternstwousingmappingseverity50 mutilisingavailablesuitabletypescompareresultscoarse-scale28 kmGlobalFireDatabasedetermineglobalmodelestimationRESULTS:inventoryyieldedtotal1125 ± 02320022 ± 0006loss56tha1 tPM hacomparablelowerfactorthreestudyhighlightsestimatingshowedproduced30%26-36%meanannualStatesinglesourceCONCLUSIONS:analyseshighlightneedimprovedspecificbettercharacterisationcoarsequantifywildfireaccuratelyCurrentaccountancyapproachexcludingGHGaccountslikelyexaggeratesTasmania'sclaimneutralitythereforerecommendplannedunplannedincludednationalstateinternationalconventionsAdvancingissuesimportantgiventrajectoryfrequentdrivenanthropogenicclimatechangeTasmanianfirestorm:implicationsEmissionFullCAMParticulatePyroCbSmokeWildfire

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)