A validation of satellite derived cyanobacteria detections with state reported events and recreation advisories across U.S. lakes.

Peter Whitman, Blake Schaeffer, Wilson Salls, Megan Coffer, Sachidananda Mishra, Bridget Seegers, Keith Loftin, Richard Stumpf, P Jeremy Werdell
Author Information
  1. Peter Whitman: Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27709, USA. Electronic address: whitman.peter@epa.gov.
  2. Blake Schaeffer: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Durham, NC 27709, USA.
  3. Wilson Salls: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Durham, NC 27709, USA.
  4. Megan Coffer: Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC 27709, USA; Center for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.
  5. Sachidananda Mishra: Consolidated Safety Services Inc. Fairfax, VA 22030, USA; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  6. Bridget Seegers: Ocean Ecology Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA; Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MD, USA.
  7. Keith Loftin: U.S. Geological Survey, Kansas Water Science Center, Lawrence, KS, USA.
  8. Richard Stumpf: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
  9. P Jeremy Werdell: Ocean Ecology Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA.

Abstract

cyanobacteria harmful algal blooms (cyanoHABs) negatively affect ecological, human, and animal health. Traditional methods of validating satellite algorithms with data from water samples are often inhibited by the expense of quantifying cyanobacteria indicators in the field and the lack of public data. However, state recreation advisories and other recorded events of cyanoHAB occurrence reported by local authorities can serve as an independent and publicly available dataset for validation. State recreation advisories were defined as a period delimited by a start and end date where a warning was issued due to detections of cyanoHABs over a state's risk threshold. State reported events were defined as any event that was documented with a single date related to cyanoHABs. This study examined the presence-absence agreement between 160 state reported cyanoHAB advisories and 1,343 events and cyanobacteria biomass estimated by a satellite algorithm called the cyanobacteria Index (CI). The true positive rate of agreement with state recreation advisories was 69% and 60% with state reported events. CI detected a reduction or absence in cyanobacteria after 76% of the recreation advisories ended. CI was used to quantify the magnitude, spatial extent, and temporal frequency of cyanoHABs; each of these three metrics were greater (r > 0.2) during state recreation advisories compared to non-advisory times with effect sizes ranging from small to large. This is the first study to quantitatively evaluate satellite algorithm performance for detecting cyanoHABs with state reported events and advisories and supports informed management decisions with satellite technologies that complement traditional field observations.

Keywords

References

  1. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2000 Oct-Dec;3(4):323-47 [PMID: 11055209]
  2. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 21;9(3):e92097 [PMID: 24658137]
  3. J Environ Manage. 2017 Sep 1;199:148-157 [PMID: 28527741]
  4. Harmful Algae. 2016 Apr;54:194-212 [PMID: 28073476]
  5. Environ Manage. 2017 Aug;60(2):293-303 [PMID: 28477239]
  6. Toxins (Basel). 2015 Mar 27;7(4):1048-64 [PMID: 25826054]
  7. Harmful Algae. 2015 Dec;49:63-74 [PMID: 26435706]
  8. Arch Toxicol. 2019 Sep;93(9):2429-2481 [PMID: 31350576]
  9. Environ Model Softw. 2018;109:93-103 [PMID: 31595145]
  10. Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 4;9(1):18310 [PMID: 31797884]
  11. Toxins (Basel). 2015 May 12;7(5):1649-63 [PMID: 25985390]
  12. Harmful Algae. 2016 Apr;54:160-173 [PMID: 28073474]
  13. Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 11;7:40326 [PMID: 28074871]
  14. Ecol Indic. 2020 Apr 1;111:105976 [PMID: 34326705]
  15. Remote Sens Environ. 2014 Mar 5;143:97-111 [PMID: 24839311]
  16. Harmful Algae. 2020 Jun;96:101828 [PMID: 32560841]
  17. Toxicon. 2010 May;55(5):909-21 [PMID: 19615396]
  18. J Mar Syst. 2009 Feb 20;76(1-2):4-15 [PMID: 28366997]
  19. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 20;774:145462 [PMID: 33609824]
  20. Sci Total Environ. 2011 Apr 15;409(10):1739-45 [PMID: 21345482]
  21. Int J Remote Sens. 2018 May 10;39(22):7789-7805 [PMID: 36419964]
  22. Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Jan 1;43(1):12-9 [PMID: 19209578]
  23. Harmful Algae. 2017 Jul;67:144-152 [PMID: 28755717]
  24. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2007 Jan;3(1):137-43 [PMID: 17283602]
  25. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016 Sep 09;65(35):925-9 [PMID: 27607896]
  26. Ecol Indic. 2017 Sep;80:84-95 [PMID: 30245589]
  27. Environ Monit Assess. 2020 Dec 2;192(12):808 [PMID: 33263783]
  28. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;619:217-37 [PMID: 18461771]
  29. Geohealth. 2020 Aug 25;4(9):e2020GH000254 [PMID: 32864541]
  30. Environ Int. 2013 Sep;59:303-27 [PMID: 23892224]
  31. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42444 [PMID: 22870327]
  32. Microorganisms. 2017 Nov 16;5(4): [PMID: 29144421]
  33. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Feb;141(1):2-18 [PMID: 21823805]
  34. Toxins (Basel). 2013 Sep 24;5(9):1597-628 [PMID: 24064718]
  35. Ecol Indic. 2021 Sep 1;128:1-107822 [PMID: 35558093]
  36. Water Res. 2021 Aug 1;201:117377 [PMID: 34218089]

Grants

  1. EPA999999/Intramural EPA

MeSH Term

Animals
Biomass
Cyanobacteria
Harmful Algal Bloom
Lakes
Recreation

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0advisoriesstaterecreationeventsreportedcyanoHABssatellitecyanobacteriaCyanobacteriaCIhealthdatafieldcyanoHABvalidationStatedefineddatedetectionsstudyagreementalgorithmharmfulalgalbloomsnegativelyaffectecologicalhumananimalTraditionalmethodsvalidatingalgorithmswatersamplesofteninhibitedexpensequantifyingindicatorslackpublicHoweverrecordedoccurrencelocalauthoritiescanserveindependentpubliclyavailabledatasetperioddelimitedstartendwarningissuedduestate'sriskthresholdeventdocumentedsinglerelatedexaminedpresence-absence1601343biomassestimatedcalledIndextruepositiverate69%60%detectedreductionabsence76%endedusedquantifymagnitudespatialextenttemporalfrequencythreemetricsgreaterr>02comparednon-advisorytimeseffectsizesrangingsmalllargefirstquantitativelyevaluateperformancedetectingsupportsinformedmanagementdecisionstechnologiescomplementtraditionalobservationsderivedacrossUSlakesHumanRecreationadvisorySatelliteValidationWaterquality

Similar Articles

Cited By