Predicting Math Ability Using Working Memory, Number Sense, and Neurophysiology in Children and Adults.

Nienke E R van Bueren, Sanne H G van der Ven, Karin Roelofs, Roi Cohen Kadosh, Evelyn H Kroesbergen
Author Information
  1. Nienke E R van Bueren: Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 GD Nijmegen, The Netherlands. ORCID
  2. Sanne H G van der Ven: Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 GD Nijmegen, The Netherlands. ORCID
  3. Karin Roelofs: Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 GD Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  4. Roi Cohen Kadosh: Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
  5. Evelyn H Kroesbergen: Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 GD Nijmegen, The Netherlands. ORCID

Abstract

Previous work has shown relations between domain-general processes, domain-specific processes, and mathematical ability. However, the underlying neurophysiological effects of mathematical ability are less clear. Recent evidence highlighted the potential role of beta oscillations in mathematical ability. Here we investigate whether domain-general (working memory) and domain-specific (number sense) processes mediate the relation between resting-state beta oscillations and mathematical ability, and how this may differ as a function of development (children vs. adults). We compared a traditional analysis method normally used in EEG studies with a more recently developed parameterization method that separates periodic from aperiodic activity. Regardless of methods chosen, we found no support for mediation of working memory and number sense, neither for children nor for adults. However, we found subtle differences between the methods. Additionally, we showed that the traditional EEG analysis method conflates periodic activity with aperiodic activity; in addition, the latter is strongly related to mathematical ability and this relation differs between children and adults. At the cognitive level, our findings do not support previous suggestions of a mediation of working memory and number sense. At the neurophysiological level our findings suggest that aperiodic, rather than periodic, activity is linked to mathematical ability as a function of development.

Keywords

References

  1. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999 Apr;29(2-3):169-95 [PMID: 10209231]
  2. J Neurosci. 2015 Sep 23;35(38):13257-65 [PMID: 26400953]
  3. Neuroscience. 2008 Jan 24;151(2):386-95 [PMID: 18063484]
  4. Nat Neurosci. 2020 Dec;23(12):1655-1665 [PMID: 33230329]
  5. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(9):e1002655 [PMID: 22969416]
  6. J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Jun;103(2):186-201 [PMID: 19281998]
  7. Int J Psychophysiol. 2016 May;103:12-21 [PMID: 25659527]
  8. Exp Brain Res. 2009 Jun;195(4):635-42 [PMID: 19452143]
  9. Learn Individ Differ. 2011 Aug;21(4):327-336 [PMID: 21845021]
  10. Biol Psychol. 2011 Apr;87(1):128-36 [PMID: 21382434]
  11. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Jun;34(7):1015-22 [PMID: 20006645]
  12. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Sep 9;17(9):e1008886 [PMID: 34499639]
  13. J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21 [PMID: 15102499]
  14. Neuron. 2013 Oct 30;80(3):751-64 [PMID: 24183025]
  15. J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Apr;96(4):284-309 [PMID: 17046017]
  16. Dev Psychol. 2008 Sep;44(5):1457-65 [PMID: 18793076]
  17. Child Neuropsychol. 2022 Feb;28(2):143-170 [PMID: 34340649]
  18. Science. 2011 May 27;332(6033):1049-53 [PMID: 21617068]
  19. Dev Neuropsychol. 2019 Apr-Jun;44(3):325-338 [PMID: 30864846]
  20. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Apr;30:265-279 [PMID: 28566139]
  21. J Neurophysiol. 2019 Dec 1;122(6):2427-2437 [PMID: 31619109]
  22. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 15;11(12):e0167179 [PMID: 27977700]
  23. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jul 03;13:227 [PMID: 31333436]
  24. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Aug;50:100969 [PMID: 34174512]
  25. Neuroimage. 2017 Sep;158:70-78 [PMID: 28676297]
  26. Dev Psychol. 2016 Dec;52(12):2130-2144 [PMID: 27736101]
  27. Int J Psychophysiol. 2016 Aug;106:115-26 [PMID: 27220781]
  28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 17;103(42):15646-50 [PMID: 17030821]
  29. J Exp Child Psychol. 2005 Jun;91(2):137-57 [PMID: 15890174]
  30. Cognition. 2017 May;162:12-26 [PMID: 28189034]
  31. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Nov;49(11):868-73 [PMID: 17979867]
  32. Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 24;12:552458 [PMID: 33716844]
  33. J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Mar;114(3):418-31 [PMID: 23270796]
  34. Neuroimage. 2007 Jul 1;36(3):993-1003 [PMID: 17490893]
  35. Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Nov;27(9):1187-97 [PMID: 19570639]
  36. J Exp Child Psychol. 2015 Mar;131:73-93 [PMID: 25521665]
  37. PLoS Biol. 2021 Jul 22;19(7):e3001325 [PMID: 34292934]
  38. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Dec;7(12):553-9 [PMID: 14643372]
  39. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020 Jun;5(6):562-568 [PMID: 32340927]
  40. Mem Cognit. 2015 Apr;43(3):367-78 [PMID: 25377509]
  41. Mem Cognit. 2001 Jan;29(1):1-9 [PMID: 11277452]
  42. Biol Psychiatry. 2019 May 1;85(9):752-759 [PMID: 30826071]
  43. Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 19;3:428 [PMID: 23162495]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mathematicalabilityworkingmemorynumbersenseactivityprocesseschildrenadultsmethodEEGperiodicaperiodicdomain-generaldomain-specificHoweverneurophysiologicalbetaoscillationsrelationfunctiondevelopmenttraditionalanalysismethodsfoundsupportmediationlevelfindingsPreviousworkshownrelationsunderlyingeffectslessclearRecentevidencehighlightedpotentialroleinvestigatewhethermediateresting-statemaydiffervscomparednormallyusedstudiesrecentlydevelopedparameterizationseparatesRegardlesschosenneithersubtledifferencesAdditionallyshowedconflatesadditionlatterstronglyrelateddifferscognitiveprevioussuggestionssuggestratherlinkedPredictingMathAbilityUsingWorkingMemoryNumberSenseNeurophysiologyChildrenAdultscognitiondevelopmentalneurosciencemathematics

Similar Articles

Cited By