ADV at the Time of COVID-19 Brain Effect between Emotional Engagement and Purchase Intention.

Martina Sansone, Michela Balconi
Author Information
  1. Martina Sansone: International Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy.
  2. Michela Balconi: International Research Center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy. ORCID

Abstract

In pandemic times, taking advantage of COVID-19-elicited emotions in commercials has been a popular tactic employed by corporations to build successful consumer engagement and, hopefully, increase sales. The present study investigates whether COVID-19-related emotional communication affects the consumer's emotional response and the approach/avoidance motivation toward the brand-measured as a function of brain hemodynamic changes-as well as the purchase intentions. The functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) was employed to record neural correlates from the prefrontal cortex while the experimental and control groups were observing respectively COVID-19-related and unrelated advertisements (ads). The hemodynamic patterns suggest that COVID-19-related ads may promote deeper emotional elaboration, shifting consumers' attention from the semantic meaning to the affective features and perhaps supporting a more favorable brand evaluation. Conversely, purchase intentions were only related to the pre-existing level of brand engagement. The findings suggest that leveraging the negative emotional potential of COVID-19 may not shift the explicit purchase intentions but could nonetheless boost emotional engagement, benefitting the final evaluation of the brand at an implicit level.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Mark. 2022 Jan;39(1):76-89 [PMID: 34539052]
  2. Neuroimage. 2014 Jan 15;85 Pt 1:72-91 [PMID: 23774396]
  3. Biol Psychol. 2004 Oct;67(1-2):219-33 [PMID: 15130532]
  4. Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 16;12:602843 [PMID: 33796042]
  5. Brain Behav. 2017 Apr 05;7(5):e00686 [PMID: 28523228]
  6. Neuron. 2004 Oct 14;44(2):379-87 [PMID: 15473974]
  7. J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;117:280-283 [PMID: 32536735]
  8. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48107 [PMID: 23144849]
  9. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jun;74(6):1464-80 [PMID: 9654756]
  10. Brain Cogn. 2015 Apr;95:67-76 [PMID: 25721430]
  11. Neuroimage. 2004 Mar;21(3):868-75 [PMID: 15006653]
  12. J Ment Health. 2021 Feb;30(1):1-2 [PMID: 32339041]
  13. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 May;74(5):1310-6 [PMID: 9599445]
  14. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(12):2156-66 [PMID: 12208011]
  15. Neuroimage. 2017 Apr 15;150:292-307 [PMID: 28213115]
  16. Neurosci Res. 2011 Nov;71(3):251-9 [PMID: 21840350]
  17. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2015 Nov;16(11):693-700 [PMID: 26481098]
  18. Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 20;8(1):3341 [PMID: 29463928]
  19. Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 07;13:834426 [PMID: 35345640]
  20. Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 15;12:654360 [PMID: 34177707]
  21. Neuroreport. 2001 Feb 12;12(2):379-83 [PMID: 11209954]
  22. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):1971 [PMID: 33479323]
  23. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2017 Mar 31;13(1):105-120 [PMID: 28450977]
  24. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Dec;20(6):1323-1335 [PMID: 33123862]
  25. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Dec;10(12):1607-14 [PMID: 25862673]
  26. Food Secur. 2020;12(4):739-747 [PMID: 32837661]
  27. Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):434-40 [PMID: 16683932]
  28. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Apr;112(4):713-9 [PMID: 11275545]
  29. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020 Jun;74(6):852-855 [PMID: 32371988]
  30. Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 30;11:553100 [PMID: 33101125]
  31. Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 10;11:556 [PMID: 32587539]
  32. Int J Consum Stud. 2021 May;45(3):396-408 [PMID: 33362434]
  33. Psychol Trauma. 2020 Aug;12(S1):S17-S21 [PMID: 32496100]
  34. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 10;17(11): [PMID: 32532077]
  35. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014;37:263-87 [PMID: 24905597]
  36. Depress Anxiety. 2014 Oct;31(10):851-61 [PMID: 24677490]
  37. Behav Neurol. 2000;12(4):191-200 [PMID: 11568431]
  38. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020 Oct;67(10):2789-2797 [PMID: 32031925]
  39. Exp Brain Res. 2020 Sep;238(9):2067-2076 [PMID: 32638037]
  40. Brain Res. 2009 Nov 3;1296:72-84 [PMID: 19703433]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0emotionalengagementpurchasebrandCOVID-19-relatedintentionsemotionsemployedconsumerhemodynamicfNIRSadssuggestmayevaluationlevelCOVID-19pandemictimestakingadvantageCOVID-19-elicitedcommercialspopulartacticcorporationsbuildsuccessfulhopefullyincreasesalespresentstudyinvestigateswhethercommunicationaffectsconsumer'sresponseapproach/avoidancemotivationtowardbrand-measuredfunctionbrainchanges-aswellfunctionalNear-InfraredSpectroscopyrecordneuralcorrelatesprefrontalcortexexperimentalcontrolgroupsobservingrespectivelyunrelatedadvertisementspatternspromotedeeperelaborationshiftingconsumers'attentionsemanticmeaningaffectivefeaturesperhapssupportingfavorableConverselyrelatedpre-existingfindingsleveragingnegativepotentialshiftexplicitnonethelessboostbenefittingfinalimplicitADVTimeBrainEffectEmotionalEngagementPurchaseIntentionneuroscienceintention

Similar Articles

Cited By