Effects of Different Types of Additional Fertilizers on Root-associated Microbes of Napa Cabbage Grown in an Andosol Field in Japan.

Seishi Ikeda, Kazuyuki Okazaki, Hirohito Tsurumaru, Takanori Suzuki, Masayuki Hirafuji
Author Information
  1. Seishi Ikeda: Memuro Research Station, Hokkaido Agricultural Research Center, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization.
  2. Kazuyuki Okazaki: Memuro Research Station, Hokkaido Agricultural Research Center, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization.
  3. Hirohito Tsurumaru: Faculty of Agriculture, Kagoshima University.
  4. Takanori Suzuki: SUN AGRO Co., Ltd.
  5. Masayuki Hirafuji: The University of Tokyo.

Abstract

The effects of different types of additional fertilizations (a compound fertilizer and Chiyoda-kasei) on the root-associated microbes of napa cabbage grown in an Andosol field were investigated by molecular community ana-lyses. Most of the closest known species of the bacterial sequences whose relative abundance significantly differed among fertilizers were sensitive to nitrogen fertilization and/or related to the geochemical cycles of nitrogen. The fungal community on the roots of napa cabbage was dominated by two genera, Bipolaris and Olpidium. The relative abundance of these two genera was affected by the types of fertilizers to some extent and showed a strong negative correlation.

Keywords

References

  1. Arch Microbiol. 2017 Dec;199(10):1399-1407 [PMID: 28748277]
  2. Microbes Environ. 2017 Dec 27;32(4):314-323 [PMID: 29187692]
  3. Microorganisms. 2019 Feb 06;7(2): [PMID: 30736387]
  4. Microb Ecol. 2013 Jul;66(1):49-59 [PMID: 23314095]
  5. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015 Feb;65(Pt 2):578-586 [PMID: 25404481]
  6. Microbes Environ. 2021;36(2): [PMID: 33907063]
  7. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020 Jan 1;96(1): [PMID: 31769797]
  8. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Mar;77(6):1973-80 [PMID: 21239540]
  9. PLoS One. 2019 Feb 25;14(2):e0204195 [PMID: 30802246]
  10. PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0210538 [PMID: 30785878]
  11. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005 Nov;55(Pt 6):2419-2425 [PMID: 16280506]
  12. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006 Sep;56(Pt 9):2223-2228 [PMID: 16957125]
  13. Microbes Environ. 2015;30(1):51-62 [PMID: 25740174]
  14. Indian J Microbiol. 2015 Dec;55(4):406-14 [PMID: 26543266]
  15. Microorganisms. 2019 Mar 15;7(3): [PMID: 30875976]
  16. Front Microbiol. 2018 Jun 08;9:1188 [PMID: 29937756]
  17. ISME J. 2010 Mar;4(3):315-26 [PMID: 19924157]
  18. Front Plant Sci. 2020 Oct 23;11:575861 [PMID: 33193517]
  19. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Nov;71(11):7245-52 [PMID: 16269765]
  20. Microb Ecol. 2020 Nov;80(4):762-777 [PMID: 31897569]
  21. Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6 [PMID: 20383131]
  22. Environ Microbiol. 2016 May;18(5):1338-51 [PMID: 26032777]
  23. Fungal Biol. 2010 Jan;114(1):26-33 [PMID: 20965058]
  24. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 Apr;78(6):1033-43 [PMID: 18320187]
  25. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2019 Sep;32(9):1162-1174 [PMID: 30933667]
  26. Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;37(8):852-857 [PMID: 31341288]
  27. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010 Sep;51(9):1398-410 [PMID: 20685969]

MeSH Term

Brassica
Fertilizers
Japan
Nitrogen
Soil

Chemicals

Fertilizers
Soil
Nitrogen

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cabbagecommunitytypesnapaAndosolrelativeabundancefertilizersnitrogenfertilizationtwogeneraBipolarisOlpidiumAdditionalNapaeffectsdifferentadditionalfertilizationscompoundfertilizerChiyoda-kaseiroot-associatedmicrobesgrownfieldinvestigatedmolecularana-lysesclosestknownspeciesbacterialsequenceswhosesignificantlydifferedamongsensitiveand/orrelatedgeochemicalcyclesfungalrootsdominatedaffectedextentshowedstrongnegativecorrelationEffectsDifferentTypesFertilizersRoot-associatedMicrobesCabbageGrownFieldJapanMicrobialana­lysisroot

Similar Articles

Cited By