Altered motivation of effortful decision-making for self and others in subthreshold depression.

Rong Bi, Wanxin Dong, Zixin Zheng, Sijin Li, Dandan Zhang
Author Information
  1. Rong Bi: School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
  2. Wanxin Dong: School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
  3. Zixin Zheng: School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
  4. Sijin Li: School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
  5. Dandan Zhang: Institute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, China. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Amotivation is a typical feature in major depressive disorders and refers to individuals exhibiting reduced willingness to exert effort for rewards. However, the motivation pattern when deciding whether to exert effort for self versus others in people with depression remains unclear.
METHODS: We conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging study and employed an adapted Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task in subthreshold depressive (SD) participants (n = 33) and healthy controls (HC) (n = 32). This required participants to choose between a fixed low-effort/low-reward and a variable high-effort/high-reward option, and then immediately exert effort to obtain corresponding rewards for themselves or for unfamiliar people.
RESULTS: Compared with the HC group, the SD group showed blunted activity in the left dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, bilateral anterior insula (AI), and right putamen-left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex functional connectivity when choosing to exert effort for themselves. Additionally, the SD group exhibited increased willingness and greater activation in the bilateral AI when choosing to exert effort for others. Furthermore, these brain activations and functional connectivity were positively related to self-reported motivation.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings show altered motivation during effort-based decision-making in individuals with the mild depressive state, particularly with higher motivation for others. Thus, this suggests that motivational behaviors and prefrontal-striatal circuitry are altered in individuals with SD, which can be utilized to discover treatment targets and develop strategies to address mental illness caused by motivation disorders.

Keywords

References

  1. Br J Med Psychol. 2000 Dec;73 Pt 4:519-30 [PMID: 11140792]
  2. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Aug;88:102065 [PMID: 34274800]
  3. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):1027-38 [PMID: 22766486]
  4. Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(8):759-70 [PMID: 11369400]
  5. J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 20;30(42):14080-90 [PMID: 20962229]
  6. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Nov;41(16):4630-4640 [PMID: 32710816]
  7. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;166(6):702-10 [PMID: 19411368]
  8. PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23178 [PMID: 21853083]
  9. J Neurosci. 2013 Apr 3;33(14):6160-9 [PMID: 23554497]
  10. Cereb Cortex. 2019 Sep 13;29(10):4277-4290 [PMID: 30541111]
  11. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Aug 31;14(8):815-826 [PMID: 31506680]
  12. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2017 Jun;4(2):117-127 [PMID: 29503791]
  13. Neuroimage. 2019 Jan 15;185:446-454 [PMID: 30347281]
  14. Neuroimage. 2015 Oct 15;120:104-13 [PMID: 26163803]
  15. Neuropsychologia. 2015 Jan;67:100-10 [PMID: 25498405]
  16. J Affect Disord. 1994 Sep;32(1):61-72 [PMID: 7798468]
  17. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Feb;121(1):51-60 [PMID: 21842963]
  18. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2014 Aug;42(6):913-24 [PMID: 24398789]
  19. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965 Jan;12:63-70 [PMID: 14221692]
  20. Depress Anxiety. 2022 Aug;39(8-9):633-645 [PMID: 35657301]
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 29;114(35):E7395-E7404 [PMID: 28808037]
  22. Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 1;84(1):38-45 [PMID: 29275840]
  23. J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 8;29(14):4531-41 [PMID: 19357278]
  24. J Affect Disord. 2013 Oct;151(1):7-22 [PMID: 23856281]
  25. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Jan 4;64:52-9 [PMID: 26192817]
  26. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Dec;21(6):1297-1305 [PMID: 34136976]
  27. J Neurosci. 2015 Aug 12;35(32):11233-51 [PMID: 26269633]
  28. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):537-55 [PMID: 20603146]
  29. Psychol Med. 2013 Jul;43(7):1401-14 [PMID: 23111093]
  30. J Affect Disord. 2009 Nov;118(1-3):69-78 [PMID: 19261334]
  31. Psychol Med. 2020 Nov 04;:1-15 [PMID: 33143780]
  32. Bipolar Disord. 2013 Dec;15(8):839-854 [PMID: 24148027]
  33. Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Apr;29(8):1678-91 [PMID: 19385990]
  34. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1998 Dec;28(3):309-69 [PMID: 9858756]
  35. J Neurosci. 2016 Sep 28;36(39):10002-15 [PMID: 27683898]
  36. PLoS Biol. 2017 Feb 24;15(2):e1002598 [PMID: 28234892]
  37. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983 Jul;40(7):801-10 [PMID: 6344834]
  38. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jul;102:371-381 [PMID: 31047891]
  39. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Apr;22(4):337-349 [PMID: 29477776]
  40. Brain. 2016 Sep;139(Pt 9):2554-66 [PMID: 27368345]
  41. Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Feb 15;63(4):369-76 [PMID: 17888408]
  42. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Aug;10(8):1102-12 [PMID: 25567763]
  43. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014 Jun;14(2):443-72 [PMID: 24920442]
  44. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Dec;131:1275-1287 [PMID: 34710515]
  45. PLoS One. 2009 Aug 12;4(8):e6598 [PMID: 19672310]
  46. Trends Neurosci. 2012 Jan;35(1):68-77 [PMID: 22177980]
  47. Neuroimage. 2013 Aug 1;76:412-27 [PMID: 23507394]
  48. PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4557 [PMID: 19234611]
  49. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202 [PMID: 11283309]
  50. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 29;115(22):E5233-E5242 [PMID: 29760060]
  51. J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 23;33(4):1706-13a [PMID: 23345243]
  52. J Neurosci. 2017 Apr 19;37(16):4370-4380 [PMID: 28283562]
  53. Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jul;1(7):0131 [PMID: 28819649]
  54. J Affect Disord. 2016 May 15;196:97-100 [PMID: 26919058]
  55. J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 May;124(2):233-45 [PMID: 25643205]
  56. Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Oct;1(10):748-756 [PMID: 31024106]
  57. J Neurosci. 2002 Dec 15;22(24):10996-1003 [PMID: 12486195]
  58. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 30;220(3):874-82 [PMID: 25262638]
  59. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Apr;67(4):380-7 [PMID: 20368513]
  60. Psychol Med. 2021 Sep 07;:1-13 [PMID: 34488919]
  61. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Aug;272(5):859-871 [PMID: 35079855]
  62. Brain Imaging Behav. 2016 Sep;10(3):920-39 [PMID: 26487590]
  63. Psychol Sci. 2021 May;32(5):668-681 [PMID: 33860711]
  64. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 Aug;121(3):553-8 [PMID: 22775583]
  65. BJPsych Open. 2019 Nov 14;5(6):e99 [PMID: 31724528]
  66. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2016;27:411-49 [PMID: 26026289]
  67. Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 1;87(5):399-408 [PMID: 31672243]
  68. Curr Biol. 2022 Oct 10;32(19):4172-4185.e7 [PMID: 36029773]
  69. J Neurosci. 2019 May 15;39(20):3934-3947 [PMID: 30850512]

MeSH Term

Decision Making
Depression
Depressive Disorder, Major
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Motivation
Reward

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0motivationeffortexertothersSDprefrontalcortexdepressiveindividualsselfdepressionsubthresholdgroupanteriordisorderswillingnessrewardspeopleparticipantsHCbilateralinsulaAIdorsolateralfunctionalconnectivitychoosingaltereddecision-makingBACKGROUND:AmotivationtypicalfeaturemajorrefersexhibitingreducedHoweverpatterndecidingwhetherversusremainsunclearMETHODS:conducteda functionalmagneticresonanceimagingstudyemployedadaptedEffort-ExpenditureRewardsTaskn = 33healthycontrolsn = 32requiredchoosefixedlow-effort/low-rewardvariablehigh-effort/high-rewardoptionimmediatelyobtaincorrespondingunfamiliarRESULTS:Comparedshowedbluntedactivityleftdorsalcingulatecortex/dorsomedialrightputamen-leftAdditionallyexhibitedincreasedgreateractivationFurthermorebrainactivationspositivelyrelatedself-reportedCONCLUSIONS:findingsshoweffort-basedmildstateparticularlyhigherThussuggestsmotivationalbehaviorsprefrontal-striatalcircuitrycanutilizeddiscovertreatmenttargetsdevelopstrategiesaddressmentalillnesscausedAlteredeffortfuldorsomedialreward

Similar Articles

Cited By