Development and psychometric evaluation of the emergency nurses' professional resilience tool.

Roohangiz Norouzinia, Mohammad Hosein Yarmohammadian, Masoud Ferdosi, Gholamreza Masoumi, Abbas Ebadi
Author Information
  1. Roohangiz Norouzinia: Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Alborz university of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran. ORCID
  2. Mohammad Hosein Yarmohammadian: Health Management and Economics Research Centre, Isfahan university of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  3. Masoud Ferdosi: Health Management and Economics Research Centre, Isfahan university of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  4. Gholamreza Masoumi: Emergency Management Research Centre, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ORCID
  5. Abbas Ebadi: Behavioural Sciences Research Centre, Life style Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is no specific tool for measuring the professional resilience of emergency nurses. Therefore, the present study aimed to design and psychometrically evaluate a new tool named the emergency nurses' professional resilience tool.
METHOD: This mixed-method sequential exploratory study was conducted in two phases: (1) item generation using literature review and evaluation of the results of a qualitative study and (2) psychometric evaluation of the developed scale. The face, content, and construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis), reliability (internal consistency, relative, and absolute), and accountability were assessed in the population of Iranian nurses (N = 465) during March 2019-June 2020.
RESULTS: The tool designed for assessing the professional resilience of Iranian nurses included 37 items. The average scale content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was equal to 0.94. The exploratory factor analysis revealed five factors, including professional competencies, emotional-cognitive characteristics, external support, in addition to behavioral and cognitive strategies, and explained 75.59% of the whole variance. Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation were 0.915 and 0.888, respectively. Construct validity for five factors was established with acceptable model fit indices [Chi-square/df = 1336.56/619, p < .001]; [Comparative Fit Index [CFI] = 0.96]; [Non-Normed Fit Index [NNFI] = 0.96]; [Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.074 and 90 Percent Confidence Interval = (0.069; 0.080)]; and [SRMR = 0.095].
CONCLUSIONS: According to the findings of the current study, the emergency nurses' professional resilience tool can be used by healthcare managers as a valid and reliable scale to evaluate the professional resilience of nurses to designate them as nurses working in emergency and disaster situations.

References

  1. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15 [PMID: 18352969]
  2. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Mar;51(3):285-6 [PMID: 9495694]
  3. Res Nurs Health. 2002 Aug;25(4):282-94 [PMID: 12124722]
  4. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016 Sep;48(5):456-65 [PMID: 27351469]
  5. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2006 Jan;27(1):43-57 [PMID: 16352515]
  6. Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Aug;41(6):671-84 [PMID: 15240091]
  7. Int Nurs Rev. 2010 Mar;57(1):22-31 [PMID: 20487471]
  8. J Clin Psychol. 1996 May;52(3):329-33 [PMID: 8835696]
  9. BMJ Open. 2012 Jul 31;2(4): [PMID: 22855629]
  10. Br J Psychol. 2014 Aug;105(3):399-412 [PMID: 24844115]
  11. Am J Manag Care. 2013 Jan;19(1):47-59 [PMID: 23379744]
  12. Can Fam Physician. 2008 May;54(5):722-9 [PMID: 18474706]
  13. Front Psychol. 2016 May 13;7:600 [PMID: 27242567]
  14. J Pers. 2009 Dec;77(6):1805-32 [PMID: 19807863]
  15. Nurse Educ Today. 2009 May;29(4):371-9 [PMID: 19056153]
  16. Nurs Forum. 2013 Jan-Mar;48(1):17-25 [PMID: 23379392]
  17. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Feb;29(1):35-46 [PMID: 31050127]
  18. J Nurs Manag. 2014 Sep;22(6):720-34 [PMID: 25208943]
  19. Nursing. 2012 Jan;42 Suppl Career:25-6 [PMID: 22157905]
  20. Br J Nurs. 2017 Jan 12;26(1):43-47 [PMID: 28079412]
  21. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Feb;78(2):191-7 [PMID: 19656650]
  22. Int J Nurs Sci. 2017 Dec 06;5(1):57-62 [PMID: 31406802]
  23. J Adv Nurs. 2007 Oct;60(1):1-9 [PMID: 17824934]
  24. Contemp Nurse. 2007 May-Jun;25(1-2):124-35 [PMID: 17622996]
  25. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1033-9 [PMID: 16980142]
  26. Collegian. 2013;20(3):195-9 [PMID: 24151698]
  27. Res Nurs Health. 2007 Aug;30(4):459-67 [PMID: 17654487]
  28. Emerg Med Australas. 2016 Feb;28(1):7-26 [PMID: 26784282]
  29. Australas J Ageing. 2010 Jun;29(2):66-71 [PMID: 20553536]
  30. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2019 Aug;33(4):434-439 [PMID: 31280791]
  31. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2011 Nov-Dec;32(6):380-3 [PMID: 22235694]

MeSH Term

Humans
Iran
Nurses
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00professional=toolresilienceemergencynursesstudynurses'exploratoryevaluationscalevalidityevaluatepsychometriccontentfactoranalysisIranianfivefactorsFitIndex96]BACKGROUND:specificmeasuringThereforepresentaimeddesignpsychometricallynewnamedMETHOD:mixed-methodsequentialconductedtwophases:1itemgenerationusingliteraturereviewresultsqualitative2developedfaceconstructconfirmatoryreliabilityinternalconsistencyrelativeabsoluteaccountabilityassessedpopulationN465March2019-June2020RESULTS:designedassessingincluded37itemsaverageindexS-CVI/Aveequal94revealedincludingcompetenciesemotional-cognitivecharacteristicsexternalsupportadditionbehavioralcognitivestrategiesexplained7559%wholevarianceCronbach'salphaintraclasscorrelation915888respectivelyConstructestablishedacceptablemodelfitindices[Chi-square/df133656/619p<001][Comparative[CFI][Non-Normed[NNFI][RootMeanSquareErrorApproximationRMSEA07490PercentConfidenceInterval069080][SRMR095]CONCLUSIONS:AccordingfindingscurrentcanusedhealthcaremanagersvalidreliabledesignateworkingdisastersituationsDevelopment

Similar Articles

Cited By