One academic year under COVID-19 conditions: two multicenter cross-sectional evaluation studies among medical students in Bavarian medical schools, Germany students' needs, difficulties, and concerns about digital teaching and learning.

Christopher Holzmann-Littig, Nina L Zerban, Clara Storm, Lilian Ulhaas, Mona Pfeiffer, Alexander Kotz, Marjo Wijnen-Meijer, Stephanie Keil, Johanna Huber
Author Information
  1. Christopher Holzmann-Littig: TUM Medical Education Center, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. christopher.holzmann-littig@mri.tum.de.
  2. Nina L Zerban: Institute of Medical Teaching and Medical Education Research, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
  3. Clara Storm: Institute for Medical Education, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Munich, Germany.
  4. Lilian Ulhaas: Faculty of Medicine, Dean's Office and Department of Medical Education Augsburg DEMEDA, Augsburg University, Augsburg, Germany.
  5. Mona Pfeiffer: Institute for Medical Education, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Munich, Germany.
  6. Alexander Kotz: Faculty of Medicine, Office of the Dean for Student Affairs, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
  7. Marjo Wijnen-Meijer: TUM Medical Education Center, Faculty of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  8. Stephanie Keil: Faculty of Medicine, Dean's Office, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
  9. Johanna Huber: Institute for Medical Education, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Munich, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since March 2020, COVID-19 has created a need for adaptation in many areas of life. This study explores medical students' perspectives on digital teaching under conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic. It focuses on expectations and concerns about digital teaching, the evaluation of specific aspects of teaching, and requests for future teaching.
METHODS: Six German faculties have joined forces within the Bavarian network for medical education to develop and deploy a common core questionnaire. Cross-sectional surveys were conducted at the end of the summer semester 2020 and winter semester 2020/21. Medical students from different semesters participated in the online survey. Data was analyzed descriptively and/or inferentially. Item differences across semesters were examined using contingency tables and Chi tests. Mean values were compared using the independent samples t-test; answer frequencies in retrospective and prospective concerns were compared using contingency tables and Chi tests with Yates' correction.
RESULTS: In the summer semester 2020, 1565 students and in winter semester 2020/21, 1727 students took part in the survey. Students' main prospective concern was lack of social exchange between fellow students (70%), but also with teachers. Second and third most often concerns were a lack of practical training (68%) and lack of integration of on-site digital teaching (50%). Approximately 7% of the students lacked sufficient access to technical equipment.. Approximately 39% of the students lacked a sufficient internet connection for synchronous digital teaching, 17% for asynchronous digital teaching. On-site teaching was the preferred form of teaching (60%), and there was a preference for asynchronous (24%) over synchronous (15%) digital teaching. Teaching recordings (79%) were particularly popular to complement future on-site teaching.
CONCLUSIONS: The following areas of education under COVID-19 conditions are highly important to medical students: adequacy of information sharing, integration of opportunities for exchange with fellow students and teachers, possibility to perform practical trainings. After the normalization of the pandemic situation, on-site teaching should be supplemented with blended learning concepts such as the inverted classroom model. Percentages of results are rounded averages from summer and winter semesters.

Keywords

References

  1. Korean J Med Educ. 2021 Jun;33(2):65-74 [PMID: 33957729]
  2. Inform Med Unlocked. 2020;20:100432 [PMID: 32959020]
  3. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 20;13:835585 [PMID: 35530024]
  4. GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Dec 03;37(7):Doc83 [PMID: 33364362]
  5. J Med Internet Res. 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34 [PMID: 15471760]
  6. JMIR Med Educ. 2020 Nov 18;6(2):e20963 [PMID: 33106227]
  7. Global Health. 2021 Jan 5;17(1):4 [PMID: 33402169]
  8. GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Jan 28;38(1):Doc27 [PMID: 33659632]
  9. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 18;15(11):e0241660 [PMID: 33206678]
  10. GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Dec 03;37(7):Doc66 [PMID: 33364345]
  11. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 10;16(2):e0246641 [PMID: 33566832]
  12. Cureus. 2020 Oct 2;12(10):e10775 [PMID: 33154845]
  13. In Vivo. 2020 Jun;34(3 Suppl):1603-1611 [PMID: 32503818]
  14. Med Teach. 2020 Jul;42(7):756-761 [PMID: 32450049]
  15. Anat Sci Educ. 2021 Jan;14(1):8-18 [PMID: 33217164]
  16. Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1919042 [PMID: 33871308]
  17. Postgrad Med J. 2021 Jun;97(1148):368-379 [PMID: 32518075]
  18. Psychiatr Danub. 2020 Autumn - Winter;32(3-4):472-477 [PMID: 33370755]
  19. JMIR Med Educ. 2021 Apr 12;7(2):e25892 [PMID: 33755578]
  20. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):341 [PMID: 33008392]
  21. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 May;67(3):298-300 [PMID: 32615838]
  22. Med Teach. 2021 Mar;43(3):253-271 [PMID: 33496628]
  23. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 13;18(6): [PMID: 33805787]
  24. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021 May 10;11(3):296-298 [PMID: 34234896]
  25. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):14 [PMID: 33407422]
  26. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2009 Aug;38(8):724-6 [PMID: 19736579]
  27. Curr Res Behav Sci. 2021 Nov;2:100011 [PMID: 38620741]
  28. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2021 Apr 16;96(1):9 [PMID: 33861363]
  29. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 25;15(11):e0242905 [PMID: 33237962]
  30. GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Dec 03;37(7):Doc85 [PMID: 33364364]
  31. GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Dec 03;37(7):Doc80 [PMID: 33364359]
  32. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Feb;16(1):360-372 [PMID: 32873349]
  33. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 5;10(11):e042378 [PMID: 33154063]
  34. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Nov 19;7:2382120520973212 [PMID: 33283049]
  35. GMS J Med Educ. 2020 Dec 03;37(7):Doc82 [PMID: 33364361]
  36. Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1854066 [PMID: 33280546]
  37. GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Jan 28;38(1):Doc29 [PMID: 33659634]
  38. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Sep 25;20(1):332 [PMID: 32977781]
  39. J Educ Health Promot. 2022 Feb 26;11:50 [PMID: 35372596]
  40. MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 May 20;9:103 [PMID: 38090049]

MeSH Term

COVID-19
Cross-Sectional Studies
Education, Distance
Germany
Humans
Pandemics
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Schools, Medical
Students, Medical

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0teachingstudentsdigitalCOVID-19medicalconcernseducationsemesterMedical2020summerwintersemestersusinglackon-sitelearningareasstudystudents'conditionspandemicevaluationfutureBavarian2020/21surveycontingencytablesChitestscomparedprospectiveexchangefellowteacherspracticalintegrationApproximatelylackedsufficientsynchronousasynchronousschoolsBACKGROUND:SinceMarchcreatedneedadaptationmanylifeexploresperspectivesfocusesexpectationsspecificaspectsrequestsMETHODS:SixGermanfacultiesjoinedforceswithinnetworkdevelopdeploycommoncorequestionnaireCross-sectionalsurveysconductedenddifferentparticipatedonlineDataanalyzeddescriptivelyand/orinferentiallyItemdifferencesacrossexaminedMeanvaluesindependentsamplest-testanswerfrequenciesretrospectiveYates'correctionRESULTS:15651727tookpartStudents'mainconcernsocial70%alsoSecondthirdoftentraining68%50%7%accesstechnicalequipment39%internetconnection17%On-sitepreferredform60%preference24%15%Teachingrecordings79%particularlypopularcomplementCONCLUSIONS:followinghighlyimportantstudents:adequacyinformationsharingopportunitiespossibilityperformtrainingsnormalizationsituationsupplementedblendedconceptsinvertedclassroommodelPercentagesresultsroundedaveragesOneacademicyearconditions:twomulticentercross-sectionalstudiesamongGermanyneedsdifficultiesDigitalDistanceEvaluationNewNormalPandemics

Similar Articles

Cited By