Effects of Copenhagen Adduction Exercise on Muscle Architecture and Adductor Flexibility.

Diego Alonso-Fernández, Rosana Fernández-Rodríguez, Yaiza Taboada-Iglesias, Águeda Gutiérrez-Sánchez
Author Information
  1. Diego Alonso-Fernández: Department of Special Didactics, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain. ORCID
  2. Rosana Fernández-Rodríguez: Department of Special Didactics, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain.
  3. Yaiza Taboada-Iglesias: Department of Special Didactics, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain. ORCID
  4. Águeda Gutiérrez-Sánchez: Department of Special Didactics, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain. ORCID

Abstract

Groin injuries are one of the most prevalent in sports, especially due to the hip adductor muscles’ weakness, which is considered as a risk factor. The Copenhagen adduction exercise (CAE) has been demonstrated to increase the strength of adductor muscles, but its effects on the architectural characteristics and flexibility of the adductors has been little studied. The aim of the present study was to analyse the impact on the muscular architecture and flexibility of the adductor musculature after 8 weeks of CAE-based training and after 4 weeks of subsequent detraining. A sample of 45 active subjects (26.1 ± 2.8 years old) were randomly divided into a control group with no intervention and an experimental group with an intervention based on 8 weeks of CAE training and 4 weeks of subsequent detraining. The muscle thickness of adductors was measured before and after training and detraining using ultrasound imaging and hip abduction range with goniometry. A significant increase in muscle thickness (left leg: +17.83%, d = 1.77, p < 0.001//right leg: +18.38%, d = 1.82, p < 0.001) and adductor flexibility was found in the experimental group (left leg: +7.3%, d = 0.96, p < 0.05//right leg: +7.15%, d = 0.94, p < 0.05), and after detraining, both variables returned to their initial values. These results could indicate that CAE would be a suitable strategy to modify the architecture of the adductors and thus form part of training protocols designed for the prevention and rehabilitation of muscle injuries.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;38(10):2051-7 [PMID: 20699426]
  2. J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Dec 6;29(8):1053-1059 [PMID: 31810057]
  3. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;48(14):1089-96 [PMID: 24795341]
  4. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;45(13):3052-3059 [PMID: 28806100]
  5. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003 Oct;33(10):557-71 [PMID: 14620785]
  6. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015 Sep;96(9):861-9 [PMID: 25823982]
  7. Glob Health Res Policy. 2021 Aug 13;6(1):29 [PMID: 34389062]
  8. Muscle Nerve. 2013 Oct;48(4):498-506 [PMID: 23852989]
  9. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Mar-Apr;29(2):124-8 [PMID: 11292035]
  10. J Biomech. 2009 Nov 13;42(15):2549-54 [PMID: 19646698]
  11. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Nov;103(5):1565-75 [PMID: 17717119]
  12. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Aug;50(16):997-1003 [PMID: 26626269]
  13. Mil Med Res. 2021 Dec 10;8(1):66 [PMID: 34886915]
  14. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 08;18(24): [PMID: 34948565]
  15. Br J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;53(3):150-157 [PMID: 29891614]
  16. Sports Med. 1997 Nov;24(5):289-99 [PMID: 9368275]
  17. Int J Sports Med. 2022 Apr;43(4):373-380 [PMID: 34464983]
  18. Sports Med. 2000 Jul;30(1):1-15 [PMID: 10907753]
  19. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Jul;48(14):1108-14 [PMID: 23511698]
  20. Br J Sports Med. 2009 Aug;43(8):556-68 [PMID: 18981046]
  21. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;51(5):469-477 [PMID: 27660368]
  22. Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jan-Feb;31(1):41-6 [PMID: 12531755]
  23. Clin J Sport Med. 2015 May;25(3):221-9 [PMID: 25010154]
  24. BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 22;13:376 [PMID: 23607782]
  25. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 Nov;26(11):1334-1342 [PMID: 26589483]
  26. Int J Sports Med. 1983 May;4(2):124-8 [PMID: 6874174]
  27. Sports Med. 2017 May;47(5):917-941 [PMID: 27647157]
  28. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2007 Aug;17(4):504-14 [PMID: 16919969]
  29. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017 Dec;57(12):1650-1659 [PMID: 27792221]
  30. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 Apr;59(4):640-647 [PMID: 30293403]
  31. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2013 Jul;33(4):267-73 [PMID: 23692615]
  32. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;49(12):803-9 [PMID: 25833903]
  33. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021 Oct 01;16(5):1210-1221 [PMID: 34631242]
  34. Clin J Sport Med. 2020 Sep;30(5):470-477 [PMID: 30418198]
  35. Br J Sports Med. 2005 Oct;39(10):757-66 [PMID: 16183774]
  36. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019 Oct 15;5(1):e000570 [PMID: 31673404]
  37. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Jan;28(1):88-94 [PMID: 28314091]
  38. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 May;47(5):905-13 [PMID: 25207929]
  39. Sports Med. 2016 Dec;46(12):1847-1867 [PMID: 27142535]
  40. Br J Sports Med. 2012 Sep;46(12):871-6 [PMID: 22006933]
  41. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2013 Feb;17(1):34-42 [PMID: 23487332]

MeSH Term

Adult
Exercise
Humans
Leg
Muscle Strength
Muscle, Skeletal
Sports
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00trainingadductorweeksdetrainingmuscleleg:d=p<CAEflexibilityadductorsarchitecture81groupinjurieshipCopenhagenincrease4subsequentinterventionexperimentalthicknessultrasoundleft+7Groinoneprevalentsportsespeciallyduemuscles’weaknessconsideredriskfactoradductionexercisedemonstratedstrengthmuscleseffectsarchitecturalcharacteristicslittlestudiedaimpresentstudyanalyseimpactmuscularmusculatureCAE-basedsample45activesubjects26±2yearsoldrandomlydividedcontrolbasedmeasuredusingimagingabductionrangegoniometrysignificant+1783%77001//right+1838%82001found3%9605//right15%9405variablesreturnedinitialvaluesresultsindicatesuitablestrategymodifythusformpartprotocolsdesignedpreventionrehabilitationEffectsAdductionExerciseMuscleArchitectureAdductorFlexibility2Deccentricinjury

Similar Articles

Cited By