OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
The New phytologist
10, 2022;236 (1): 71-85.

Consistent diurnal pattern of leaf respiration in the light among contrasting species and climates.

Andreas H Faber, Kevin L Griffin, Mark G Tjoelker, Majken Pagter, Jinyan Yang, Dan Bruhn
Author Information
  1. Andreas H Faber: Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7H, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark. ORCID
  2. Kevin L Griffin: Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, 10964, USA. ORCID
  3. Mark G Tjoelker: Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, 2750, Australia. ORCID
  4. Majken Pagter: Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7H, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark. ORCID
  5. Jinyan Yang: Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, 2750, Australia. ORCID
  6. Dan Bruhn: Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers Vej 7H, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark. ORCID
PMID: 35727175 DOI: 10.1111/nph.18330

Abstract

Leaf daytime respiration (leaf respiration in the light, R ) is often assumed to constitute a fixed fraction of leaf dark respiration (R ) (i.e. a fixed light inhibition of respiration (R )) and vary diurnally due to temperature fluctuations. These assumptions were tested by measuring R , R and the light inhibition of R in the field at a constant temperature using the Kok method. Measurements were conducted diurnally on 21 different species: 13 deciduous, four evergreen and four herbaceous from humid continental and humid subtropical climates. R and R showed significant diurnal variations and the diurnal pattern differed in trajectory and magnitude between climates, but not between plant functional types (PFTs). The light inhibition of R varied diurnally and differed between climates and in trajectory between PFTs. The results highlight the entrainment of leaf daytime respiration to the diurnal cycle and that time of day should be accounted for in studies seeking to examine the environmental and biological drivers of leaf daytime respiration.

Keywords

Kok method dark respiration diurnal rhythm diurnal variation leaf respiration light respiration plant functional types

Associated Data

figshare | 10.6084/m9.figshare.20089256

References

  1. Tree Physiol. 2014 Jun;34(6):564-84 [PMID: 24722001]
  2. Ecol Appl. 1991 Nov;1(4):399-429 [PMID: 27755669]
  3. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2003 Sep 30;1606(1-3):117-25 [PMID: 14507432]
  4. New Phytol. 2013 Mar;197(4):1161-1172 [PMID: 23278298]
  5. Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2013 Jul;15(4):769-75 [PMID: 23451982]
  6. New Phytol. 2011 Mar;189(4):1027-1039 [PMID: 21128944]
  7. Plant Physiol. 2019 Aug;180(4):1947-1961 [PMID: 31213510]
  8. Photosynth Res. 2014 Feb;119(1-2):89-100 [PMID: 23812760]
  9. Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Nov;32(11):1513-24 [PMID: 19558403]
  10. Annu Rev Genet. 2006;40:409-48 [PMID: 17094740]
  11. Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Jul;30(7):820-33 [PMID: 17547654]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 15;105(2):797-802 [PMID: 18184808]
  13. Planta. 1981 Dec;153(4):376-87 [PMID: 24276943]
  14. Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Oct;30(10):1284-98 [PMID: 17727418]
  15. New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(2):670-686 [PMID: 30394553]
  16. Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Dec;30(12):1535-44 [PMID: 17986155]
  17. Plant Cell Environ. 2010 Jun;33(6):900-13 [PMID: 20082670]
  18. New Phytol. 2017 Apr;214(2):506-510 [PMID: 28318034]
  19. J Exp Bot. 2017 May 17;68(11):2849-2857 [PMID: 28575237]
  20. Am J Bot. 2012 Oct;99(10):1702-14 [PMID: 22984095]
  21. Funct Plant Biol. 2005 Apr;32(2):87-105 [PMID: 32689114]
  22. New Phytol. 2016 Aug;211(3):850-63 [PMID: 27122489]
  23. New Phytol. 2017 Dec;216(4):986-1001 [PMID: 28967668]
  24. New Phytol. 2016 May;210(3):1130-44 [PMID: 26719951]
  25. Plant Physiol. 2004 Oct;136(2):3245-54 [PMID: 15377781]
  26. New Phytol. 2012 Jul;195(1):4-7 [PMID: 22626261]
  27. Oecologia. 2005 Mar;143(2):271-9 [PMID: 15657760]
  28. Plant Cell Environ. 2012 May;35(5):966-81 [PMID: 22091780]
  29. J Exp Bot. 2016 Feb;67(3):821-33 [PMID: 26552882]
  30. Plant Cell Environ. 2011 Jan;34(1):89-112 [PMID: 21039609]
  31. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Oct;21(10):548-54 [PMID: 16806577]
  32. Plant Physiol. 1987 Apr;83(4):1032-6 [PMID: 16665319]
  33. New Phytol. 2011 Jun;190(4):1003-1018 [PMID: 21434926]
  34. Tree Physiol. 2017 Aug 1;37(8):1069-1083 [PMID: 28541536]
  35. Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Jan;19(1):45-63 [PMID: 23504720]
  36. Plant Physiol. 1983 Mar;71(3):574-81 [PMID: 16662869]
  37. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jan;87(2):673-6 [PMID: 11607058]
  38. Funct Plant Biol. 2003 Feb;30(2):171-186 [PMID: 32689003]
  39. New Phytol. 2015 Apr;206(2):614-36 [PMID: 25581061]
  40. Plant Physiol. 2021 May 27;186(1):297-314 [PMID: 33591309]
  41. Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jun;20(6):1901-12 [PMID: 24677488]
  42. New Phytol. 2019 Aug;223(3):1230-1240 [PMID: 31081546]
  43. Planta. 1993 Mar;189(3):369-76 [PMID: 24178493]
  44. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Feb 27;98(5):2479-84 [PMID: 11226264]
  45. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 20;104(47):18866-70 [PMID: 17962418]
  46. Plant Sci. 2014 Sep;226:120-30 [PMID: 25113457]
  47. New Phytol. 2010 Mar;185(4):988-99 [PMID: 20070539]
  48. New Phytol. 2005 Aug;167(2):493-508 [PMID: 15998401]
  49. New Phytol. 2011 Feb;189(3):659-677 [PMID: 21223283]
  50. Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Aug;22(8):2913-28 [PMID: 26728638]
  51. Nat Plants. 2016 Jul 18;2:16111 [PMID: 27428669]
  52. New Phytol. 2005 Aug;167(2):377-84 [PMID: 15998391]
  53. New Phytol. 2011 Jul;191(1):15-18 [PMID: 21631506]
  54. Plant Physiol. 1992 Apr;98(4):1429-36 [PMID: 16668811]
  55. New Phytol. 2017 Aug;215(3):992-1008 [PMID: 28505389]
  56. Tree Physiol. 2003 Oct;23(14):969-76 [PMID: 12952783]
  57. Plant Cell Environ. 2012 Dec;35(12):2208-20 [PMID: 22646810]
  58. J Exp Bot. 2011 Jun;62(10):3489-99 [PMID: 21382918]
  59. New Phytol. 2011 Jun;190(4):990-1002 [PMID: 21294737]
  60. Plant Physiol. 1992 Oct;100(2):908-14 [PMID: 16653075]
  61. New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(1):132-143 [PMID: 30372524]
  62. New Phytol. 2020 Sep;227(6):1764-1775 [PMID: 32369617]
  63. New Phytol. 2012 Jul;195(1):136-48 [PMID: 22548389]
  64. Plant Physiol. 2005 Jul;138(3):1596-606 [PMID: 15980193]
  65. Biosystems. 2011 Feb;103(2):309-13 [PMID: 20951761]
  66. Planta. 1985 Aug;165(3):397-406 [PMID: 24241146]
  67. Plant Physiol. 2009 Oct;151(2):620-30 [PMID: 19675152]
  68. Plant Physiol. 2000 Mar;122(3):915-23 [PMID: 10712556]
  69. Photosynth Res. 2014 Feb;119(1-2):181-90 [PMID: 23529849]
  70. Funct Plant Biol. 2014 Feb;41(3):287-300 [PMID: 32480989]
  71. Tree Physiol. 2013 May;33(5):505-15 [PMID: 23592296]
  72. New Phytol. 2020 Nov;228(4):1243-1255 [PMID: 32564374]
  73. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2012 Jun;15(3):308-14 [PMID: 22244081]
  74. Plant Physiol. 1994 May;105(1):167-172 [PMID: 12232196]
  75. New Phytol. 2017 Apr;214(2):570-584 [PMID: 28318033]
  76. New Phytol. 2017 Dec;216(4):1064-1071 [PMID: 28857173]
  77. Tree Physiol. 2015 Aug;35(8):840-9 [PMID: 26253839]

MeSH Term

Climate
Plant Leaves
Plants
Respiration
Temperature
Journal Article
Article has an altmetric score of 2

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0respirationRleaflightdiurnalclimatesdaytimeinhibitiondiurnallyfixeddarktemperatureKokmethodfourhumidpatterndifferedtrajectoryplantfunctionaltypesPFTsLeafoftenassumedconstitutefractionievaryduefluctuationsassumptionstestedmeasuringfieldconstantusingMeasurementsconducted21differentspecies:13deciduousevergreenherbaceouscontinentalsubtropicalshowedsignificantvariationsmagnitudevariedresultshighlightentrainmentcycletimedayaccountedstudiesseekingexamineenvironmentalbiologicaldriversConsistentamongcontrastingspeciesrhythmvariation

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)