Arthroscopic Treatment Yields Lower Reoperation Rates than Open Treatment for Native Knee but Not Native Shoulder Septic Arthritis.

Ajay S Padaki, Gabrielle C Ma, Nicole M Truong, Charles J Cogan, Drew A Lansdown, Brian T Feeley, C Benjamin Ma, Alan L Zhang
Author Information
  1. Ajay S Padaki: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
  2. Gabrielle C Ma: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
  3. Nicole M Truong: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
  4. Charles J Cogan: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
  5. Drew A Lansdown: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
  6. Brian T Feeley: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
  7. C Benjamin Ma: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
  8. Alan L Zhang: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the incidence, patient demographics, complication rates, readmission rates, and reoperation rates of open and arthroscopic surgery performed for septic arthritis in native knee and shoulder joints.
Methods: Records of patients who were diagnosed with native knee or shoulder septic arthritis and underwent open or arthroscopic irrigation and debridement (I&D) between 2015 and 2018 were queried from the PearlDiver Mariner Database. International Classification of Diseases 10th (ICD-10) diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify patients and track reoperations. Reoperation procedures, including revision open and arthroscopic I&D, were analyzed at 1 month, 1 year, and 2 years. Complications, emergency department (ED) admissions, and hospital readmissions within 30 days were analyzed and compared between the open and arthroscopic cohorts.
Results: The query resulted with 1,993 patients who underwent knee I&D (75.3% arthroscopic, 24.7% open, < .001) and 476 patients who underwent shoulder I&D (64.8% arthroscopic, 35.2% open, < .001). One-month complication rates (11.6-22.7%) and hospital readmission rates (15.8-19.6%) were similar for arthroscopic and open treatment for knee and shoulder septic arthritis. Reoperation rates for revision I&D of the knee were higher after open compared to arthroscopic treatment at 1 month, 1 and 2 years (20.9% vs. 16.7%, 32.5% vs 27.6% and 34.1% vs. 29.4%, < .05, respectively). For shoulder septic arthritis 1-month, 1-year, and 2-year reoperation rates were similar for open and arthroscopic treatment (16.0% vs 11.7%, 22.0% vs 19.3%, and 22.7% vs 20.0%,  = .57, respectively). Lastly, 6.7% of patients with native septic knee arthritis underwent subsequent arthroplasty by 2 years.
Conclusion: Arthroscopic treatment carries a lower reoperation rate than open surgery for knee septic arthritis, but in the shoulder, the risk for revision I&D is similar after arthroscopic or open surgery.

References

  1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Mar 15;99(6):499-505 [PMID: 28291183]
  2. J Knee Surg. 2017 Nov;30(9):872-878 [PMID: 28249348]
  3. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jun;29(6):1121-1126 [PMID: 32057658]
  4. Arthroscopy. 2019 Jul;35(7):1984-1991 [PMID: 31196694]
  5. Infect Dis Now. 2020 May 5;51(2):164-169 [PMID: 32387296]
  6. Arthroscopy. 2018 Jan;34(1):213-219 [PMID: 28866341]
  7. Arthroscopy. 2022 Jun;38(6):1802-1809.e2 [PMID: 34920004]
  8. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013 Nov;21(11):647-56 [PMID: 24187034]
  9. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep 07;9(9):23259671211036493 [PMID: 34514010]
  10. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Apr 1;97(7):558-64 [PMID: 25834080]
  11. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Sep 15;103(18):1685-1693 [PMID: 34524216]
  12. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:5491971 [PMID: 27688601]
  13. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Aug;25(8):e175-e184 [PMID: 28665804]
  14. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Jan;30(1):34-39 [PMID: 32807379]
  15. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006 Apr;12(4):309-14 [PMID: 16524406]
  16. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Feb;101(1):61-4 [PMID: 25623272]
  17. J Orthop. 2021 Apr 22;25:88-92 [PMID: 33994704]
  18. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Sep 24;9(9):23259671211040891 [PMID: 34604433]
  19. Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(8):781-96 [PMID: 21843213]
  20. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013 Mar;22(3):418-21 [PMID: 22748928]
  21. J Knee Surg. 2021 Jan;34(1):74-79 [PMID: 31288270]
  22. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Sep;91(9):1127-33 [PMID: 19721035]

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By