OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
Environmental science and pollution research international
Nov, 2022;29 (54): 82064-82077.

Firm characteristics, governance mechanisms, and ESG disclosure: how caring about sustainable concerns?

Fahad Khalid, Asif Razzaq, Jiang Ming, Ummara Razi
Author Information
  1. Fahad Khalid: School of Economics, Guangzhou City University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
  2. Asif Razzaq: School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China. asifrazzaq@yahoo.com. ORCID
  3. Jiang Ming: Business School, University of International Business & Economics, Beijing, China.
  4. Ummara Razi: Department of Business Administration, ILMA University, Karachi, Pakistan.
PMID: 35750908 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21489-z

Abstract

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) pillars help determine the business organizations' sustainable business practices. Considering the same, this research examines the association between firm characteristics, governance mechanisms, and ESG for a sample of 564 firms from fifteen developed economies. For empirical analysis, ordinary least square, fixed effect, and random effect estimations techniques were applied using annual data from 2010 to 2019. The overall findings reveal that the governance structure of firms (board size, board independence, and cross-listing) play a significant role in ESG disclosure. Moreover, low corruption perception reflects higher ESG disclosure among the targeted firms. Additionally, firm characteristics; such as liquidity position shows a better reporting of ESG during the study period. When accounting for the ESG disclosure individually, the findings confirm the productive role of board size, current ratio, and low corruption towards environmental exposure. Lastly, the results demonstrate that board size and ESG disclosure promote better financial performance. These results offer valuable policy recommendations.

Keywords

Cross-listing ESG disclosure Governance Sustainable concerns

References

  1. Adams M, Jiang W (2016) Do outside directors influence the financial performance of risk-trading firms? Evidence from the United Kingdom (UK) insurance industry. J Bank Finance 64:36–51 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.11.018]
  2. Aggarwal R, Dow S (2013) Corporate governance and business strategies for climate change and environmental mitigation. In Entrepreneurship, finance, governance and ethics (pp. 315–340): Springer.
  3. Alabdullah TTY (2016) Are board size and ownership structure beneficial in emerging markets’ firms? Evidence from Jordan. Int J Manag Inf Syst 20(3):87–94
  4. Alareeni BA, Hamdan A (2020) ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance: Int J Bus Soc.
  5. Albarrak MS, Elnahass M, Salama A (2019) The effect of carbon dissemination on cost of equity. Bus Strateg Environ 28(6):1179–1198 [DOI: 10.1002/bse.2310]
  6. Albitar K, Hussainey K, Kolade N, Gerged AM (2020) ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR: the moderating role of governance mechanisms. Int J Account Inf Manag 28(3):429–444
  7. Amel-Zadeh A, Serafeim G (2018) Why and how investors use ESG information: evidence from a global survey. Financ Anal J 74(3):87–103 [DOI: 10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2]
  8. Beekes W, Brown P, Zhan W, Zhang Q (2016) Corporate governance, companies’ disclosure practices and market transparency: a cross country study. J Bus Financ Acc 43(3–4):263–297 [DOI: 10.1111/jbfa.12174]
  9. Bell RG, Filatotchev I, Rasheed AA (2012) The liability of foreignness in capital markets: sources and remedies. J Int Bus Stud 43(2):107–122 [DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2011.55]
  10. Bennear LS, Olmstead SM (2008) The impacts of the “right to know”: information disclosure and the violation of drinking water standards. J Environ Econ Manag 56(2):117–130 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jeem.2008.03.002]
  11. Breuer W, Müller T, Rosenbach D, Salzmann A (2018) Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and cost of equity: a cross-country comparison. J Bank Finance 96:34–55 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.07.018]
  12. Bui B, Moses O, Houqe MN (2020) Carbon disclosure, emission intensity and cost of equity capital: multi-country evidence. Acc & Finance 60(1):47–71 [DOI: 10.1111/acfi.12492]
  13. Campbell JL (2007) Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad Manag Rev 32(3):946–967 [DOI: 10.5465/amr.2007.25275684]
  14. Clementino E, Perkins R (2021) How do companies respond to environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy. J Bus Ethics 171(2):379–397 [DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04441-4]
  15. Cooper MJ, Gulen H, Ovtchinnikov AV (2010) Corporate political contributions and stock returns. J Financ 65(2):687–724 [DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01548.x]
  16. Correa-Garcia JA, Garcia-Benau MA, Garcia-Meca E (2020) Corporate governance and its implications for sustainability reporting quality in Latin American business groups. J Clean Prod 260:121142 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121142]
  17. Cuadrado-Ballesteros B, Rodríguez-Ariza L, García-Sánchez I-M (2015) The role of independent directors at family firms in relation to corporate social responsibility disclosures. Int Bus Rev 24(5):890–901 [DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.04.002]
  18. Czerwińska T, Kaźmierkiewicz P (2015) ESG rating in investment risk analysis of companies listed on the public market in Poland. Econ Notes: Rev Bank, Finance Monet Econ 44(2):211–248 [DOI: 10.1111/ecno.12031]
  19. Dahya J, McConnell JJ (2007) Board composition, corporate performance, and the Cadbury committee recommendation. J Financ Quant Anal 42(3):535–564 [DOI: 10.1017/S0022109000004099]
  20. DallaVia N, Perego P (2018) Determinants of conflict minerals disclosure under the Dodd-Frank Act. Bus Strateg Environ 27(6):773–788 [DOI: 10.1002/bse.2030]
  21. Dhaliwal D, Li OZ, Tsang A, Yang YG (2014) Corporate social responsibility disclosure and the cost of equity capital: the roles of stakeholder orientation and financial transparency. J Account Public Policy 33(4):328–355 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.04.006]
  22. Fatemi A, Fooladi I, Tehranian H (2015) Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility. J Bank Finance 59:182–192 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.04.028]
  23. Fidora M, Fratzscher M, Thimann C (2007) Home bias in global bond and equity markets: the role of real exchange rate volatility. J Int Money Financ 26(4):631–655 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2007.03.002]
  24. Frias-Aceituno JV, Rodriguez-Ariza L, Garcia-Sanchez IM (2013) The role of the board in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 20(4):219–233 [DOI: 10.1002/csr.1294]
  25. Galbreath J (2013) ESG in focus: the Australian evidence. J Bus Ethics 118(3):529–541 [DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1607-9]
  26. Garcia AS, Mendes-Da-Silva W, Orsato RJ (2017) Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: evidence from emerging markets. J Clean Prod 150:135–147 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.180]
  27. Ghoul SE, Guedhami O, Kim Y (2017) Country-level institutions, firm value, and the role of corporate social responsibility initiatives. J Int Bus Stud 48(3):360–385 [DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2016.4]
  28. Gu YJ, Filatotchev I, Bell RG, Rasheed AA (2019) Liability of foreignness in capital markets: institutional distance and the cost of debt. J Corp Finan 57:142–160 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.10.014]
  29. Hail L, Leuz C (2009) Cost of capital effects and changes in growth expectations around US cross-listings. J Financ Econ 93(3):428–454 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.006]
  30. Hainmueller J, Hiscox MJ (2015) Buying green? Field experimental tests of consumer support for environmentalism. Field Experimental Tests of Consumer Support for Environmentalism 1–30
  31. He W (2011) Governance transparency and capital allocation: a note. Abacus 47(1):109–118 [DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00333.x]
  32. He X, Mishra S, Aman A, Shahbaz M, Razzaq A, Sharif A (2021) The linkage between clean energy stocks and the fluctuations in oil price and financial stress in the US and Europe? Evid QARDL Approach Resour Policy 72:102021 [DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102021]
  33. Husted BW (2005) Culture and ecology: A cross-national study of the determinants of environmental sustainability. MIR: Manag Int Rev, 349–371.
  34. Husted BW, de Sousa-Filho JM (2019) Board structure and environmental, social, and governance disclosure in Latin America. J Bus Res 102:220–227 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.017]
  35. Ioannou I, Serafeim G (2012) What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. J Int Bus Stud 43(9):834–864 [DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2012.26]
  36. Irfan M, Ahmad M (2021) Relating consumers’ information and willingness to buy electric vehicles: Does personality matter? Transp Res Part d: Transp Environ 100:103049 [DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103049]
  37. Irfan M, Razzaq A, Suksatan W, Sharif A, Elavarasan RM, Yang C, Rauf A (2022) Asymmetric impact of temperature on COVID-19 spread in India: evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression approach. J Therm Biol 104:103101 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.103101]
  38. Khan SAR., Godil DI, Jabbour CJC, Shujaat S, Razzaq A, Yu Z (2021) Green data analytics, blockchain technology for sustainable development, and sustainable supply chain practices: evidence from small and medium enterprises. Ann Oper Res, 1–25.
  39. Kim E-H, Lyon TP (2015) Greenwash vs brownwash: exaggeration and undue modesty in corporate sustainability disclosure. Organ sci 26(3):705–723 [DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0949]
  40. Kingsley AF, Graham BA (2017) The effects of information voids on capital flows in emerging markets. J Int Bus Stud 48(3):324–343 [DOI: 10.1057/s41267-016-0056-6]
  41. Lang MH, Lins KV, Miller DP (2003) ADRs, analysts, and accuracy: does cross listing in the United States improve a firm’s information environment and increase market value? J Account Res 41(2):317–345 [DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.00106]
  42. Lavin JF, Montecinos-Pearce AA (2021) ESG disclosure in an emerging market: an empirical analysis of the influence of board characteristics and ownership structure. Sustainability 13(19):10498 [DOI: 10.3390/su131910498]
  43. Leuz C, Lins KV, Warnock FE (2009) Do foreigners invest less in poorly governed firms? Rev Financ Stud 22(8):3245–3285 [DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhn089]
  44. Liang J, Razzaq A, Sharif A, Irfan M (2022) Revisiting economic and non-economic indicators of natural resources: analysis of developed economies. Resour Policy 77:102748 [DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102748]
  45. Liu Y, Miletkov MK, Wei Z, Yang T (2015) Board independence and firm performance in China. J Corp Finan 30:223–244 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.12.004]
  46. Manes-Rossi F, Nicolò G, Tudor AT, Zanellato G (2020) Drivers of integrated reporting by state-owned enterprises in Europe: a longitudinal analysis. Meditari Account Res 29(3):586–616
  47. Matos P (2020) ESG and responsible institutional investing around the world: a critical review. CFA Institute Research Foundation Literature Reviews 1–80
  48. Merton RC (1987) A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. J Finance 42(3):483–510
  49. Ng AC, Rezaee Z (2015) Business sustainability performance and cost of equity capital. J Corp Finan 34:128–149 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.08.003]
  50. Pathan S, Skully M, Wickramanayake J (2007) Board size, independence and performance: an analysis of Thai banks. Asia-Pacific Finan Markets 14(3):211–227 [DOI: 10.1007/s10690-007-9060-y]
  51. Qiu W, Bian Y, Zhang J, Irfan M (2022) The role of environmental regulation, industrial upgrading, and resource allocation on foreign direct investment: evidence from 276 Chinese cities. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 1–17.
  52. Razzaq A, Sharif A, Najmi A, Tseng ML, Lim MK (2021) Dynamic and causality interrelationships from municipal solid waste recycling to economic growth, carbon emissions and energy efficiency using a novel bootstrapping autoregressive distributed lag. Resour Conserv Recycl 166:105372 [DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105372]
  53. Razzaq A, Fatima T, Murshed M (2021a) Asymmetric effects of tourism development and green innovation on economic growth and carbon emissions in Top 10 GDP Countries. J Environ Plan Manag, 1–30.
  54. Reber B, Gold A, Gold S (2021) ESG disclosure and idiosyncratic risk in Initial Public Offerings. J bus eth, 1–20.
  55. Serafeim G, Grewal J (2017) The value relevance of corporate sustainability disclosures: an analysis of a dataset from one large asset owner. Available at SSRN 2966767.
  56. Shao L, Zhang H, Irfan M (2021) How public expenditure in recreational and cultural industry and socioeconomic status caused environmental sustainability in OECD countries?. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1–18.
  57. Sharif A, Raza SA, Ozturk I, Afshan S (2019) The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: a global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations. Renew Energy 133:685–691 [DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.052]
  58. Sharif A, Aloui C, Yarovaya L (2020) COVID-19 pandemic, oil prices, stock market, geopolitical risk and policy uncertainty nexus in the US economy: fresh evidence from the wavelet-based approach. Int Rev Financ Anal 70:101496 [DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101496]
  59. Shen J, Jiuhua Zhu C (2011) Effects of socially responsible human resource management on employee organizational commitment. Int J Hum Resour Manag 22(15):3020–3035 [DOI: 10.1080/09585192.2011.599951]
  60. Siew R (2014) Evaluating and enhancing the impact of sustainability reporting tools (SRTs). School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, the University of New South …,
  61. Siew RY, Balatbat MC, Carmichael DG (2016) The impact of ESG disclosures and institutional ownership on market information asymmetry. Asia-Pac J Account Econ 23(4):432–448
  62. Sinha A, Mishra S, Sharif A, Yarovaya L (2021) Does green financing help to improve environmental & social responsibility? Designing SDG framework through advanced quantile modelling. J Environ Manage 292:112751 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112751]
  63. Solomon JF, Solomon A, Norton SD, Joseph NL (2011) Private climate change reporting: an emerging discourse of risk and opportunity? Account Audit Accountability J 24(8):1119–1148
  64. Subramanian A, Mattoo A, Van Der Mensbrugghe D, He J (2009) Reconciling climate change and trade policy. Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper(09–15).
  65. Suki NM, Sharif A, Afshan S, Suki NM (2020) Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve in Malaysia: the role of globalization in sustainable environment. J Clean Prod 264:121669 [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121669]
  66. Sun Y, Anwar A, Razzaq A, Liang X, Siddique M (2022) Asymmetric role of renewable energy, green innovation, and globalization in deriving environmental sustainability: evidence from top-10 polluted countries. Renew Energy 185:280–290 [DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.038]
  67. Sun Y, Guan W, Razzaq A, Shahzad M, An NB (2022) Transition towards ecological sustainability through fiscal decentralization, renewable energy and green investment in OECD countries. Renew Energy 190:385–395 [DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.099]
  68. Sun Y, Razzaq A, Sun H, Irfan M (2022b) The asymmetric influence of renewable energy and green innovation on carbon neutrality in China: analysis from non-linear ARDL model. Renew Energy.
  69. Tamimi N, Sebastianelli R (2017) Transparency among S&P 500 companies: an analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Manag Decis 55(8):1660–1680
  70. Tang C, Irfan M, Razzaq A, Dagar V (2022) Natural resources and financial development: role of business regulations in testing the resource-curse hypothesis in ASEAN countries. Resour Policy 76:102612 [DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102612]
  71. Tang C, Xue Y, Wu H, Irfan M, Hao Y (2022b) How does telecommunications infrastructure affect eco-efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Technol Soc, 101963.
  72. Townsend B (2020) From sri to esg: the origins of socially responsible and sustainable investing. J Impact and ESG Invest 1(1):10–25 [DOI: 10.3905/jesg.2020.1.1.010]
  73. Tulung, J. E., & Ramdani, D. (2018). Independence, size and performance of the board: an emerging market research. Corp Ownersh Control, 15(2).
  74. VicSuper (2014) Annual Report | VicSuper. https://www.vicsuper.com.au/about-us/annual-report
  75. Vitolla F, Raimo N, Rubino M (2020) Board characteristics and integrated reporting quality: an agency theory perspective. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 27(2):1152–1163 [DOI: 10.1002/csr.1879]
  76. Wright P, Ferris SP (1997) Agency conflict and corporate strategy: the effect of divestment on corporate value. Strateg Manag J 18(1):77–83 [DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199701)18]
  77. Xiang H, Chau KY, Iqbal W, Irfan M, Dagar V (2022) Determinants of social commerce usage and online impulse purchase: implications for business and digital revolution. Front Psychol 13:837042–837042 [DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.837042]
  78. Yang Q, Du Q, Razzaq A, Shang Y (2022) How volatility in green financing, clean energy, and green economic practices derive sustainable performance through ESG indicators? A sectoral study of G7 countries. Resour Policy 75:102526 [DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102526]
  79. Yu EP-Y, Van Luu B (2021) International variations in ESG disclosure–do cross-listed companies care more? Int Rev Financ Anal 75:101731 [DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101731]
  80. Yumei H, Iqbal W, Irfan M, Fatima A (2022) The dynamics of public spending on sustainable green economy: role of technological innovation and industrial structure effects. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(16):22970–22988 [DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17407-4]
  81. Zhang H, Razzaq A, Pelit I, Irmak E (2021) Does freight and passenger transportation industries are sustainable in BRICS countries? Evidence from advance panel estimations. Econ res-Ekonomska istraživanja, 1–21.
  82. Zhu H, Cai K (2014) Cultural distance and bond pricing: evidence in the Yankee and Rule 144a bond markets. J Financ Res 37(3):357–384 [DOI: 10.1111/jfir.12040]

MeSH Term

Organizations
Disclosure
Journal Article

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ESGdisclosuregovernanceboardcharacteristicsfirmssizebusinesssustainablefirmmechanismseffectfindingsrolelowcorruptionbetterresultsEnvironmentalsocialpillarshelpdetermineorganizations'practicesConsideringresearchexaminesassociationsample564fifteendevelopedeconomiesempiricalanalysisordinaryleastsquarefixedrandomestimationstechniquesappliedusingannualdata20102019overallrevealstructureindependencecross-listingplaysignificantMoreoverperceptionreflectshigheramongtargetedAdditionallyliquiditypositionshowsreportingstudyperiodaccountingindividuallyconfirmproductivecurrentratiotowardsenvironmentalexposureLastlydemonstratepromotefinancialperformanceoffervaluablepolicyrecommendationsFirmdisclosure:caringconcerns?Cross-listingGovernanceSustainableconcerns

Similar Articles

Cited By