Investigating the characteristics of genes and variants associated with self-reported hearing difficulty in older adults in the UK Biobank.

Morag A Lewis, Bradley A Schulte, Judy R Dubno, Karen P Steel
Author Information
  1. Morag A Lewis: Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK. morag.lewis@kcl.ac.uk. ORCID
  2. Bradley A Schulte: The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
  3. Judy R Dubno: The Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
  4. Karen P Steel: Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Age-related hearing loss is a common, heterogeneous disease with a strong genetic component. More than 100 loci have been reported to be involved in human hearing impairment to date, but most of the genes underlying human adult-onset hearing loss remain unknown. Most genetic studies have focussed on very rare variants (such as family studies and patient cohort screens) or very common variants (genome-wide association studies). However, the contribution of variants present in the human population at intermediate frequencies is hard to quantify using these methods, and as a result, the landscape of variation associated with adult-onset hearing loss remains largely unknown.
RESULTS: Here we present a study based on exome sequencing and self-reported hearing difficulty in the UK Biobank, a large-scale biomedical database. We have carried out variant load analyses using different minor allele frequency and impact filters, and compared the resulting gene lists to a manually curated list of nearly 700 genes known to be involved in hearing in humans and/or mice. An allele frequency cutoff of 0.1, combined with a high predicted variant impact, was found to be the most effective filter setting for our analysis. We also found that separating the participants by sex produced markedly different gene lists. The gene lists obtained were investigated using gene ontology annotation, functional prioritisation and expression analysis, and this identified good candidates for further study.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that relatively common as well as rare variants with a high predicted impact contribute to age-related hearing impairment and that the genetic contributions to adult hearing difficulty may differ between the sexes. Our manually curated list of deafness genes is a useful resource for candidate gene prioritisation in hearing loss.

Keywords

References

  1. Nat Genet. 2002 Mar;30(3):277-84 [PMID: 11850618]
  2. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Oct;21(4):323-328 [PMID: 29018493]
  3. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jul 2;47(W1):W191-W198 [PMID: 31066453]
  4. J Neurosci. 2015 Mar 11;35(10):4280-6 [PMID: 25762674]
  5. Nat Commun. 2019 Aug 23;10(1):3801 [PMID: 31444330]
  6. Nat Genet. 2021 Apr;53(4):416-419 [PMID: 33833456]
  7. Nat Genet. 2021 Jul;53(7):942-948 [PMID: 34183854]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jan 15;116(3):950-959 [PMID: 30591557]
  9. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Aug;28(8):1056-1065 [PMID: 32203203]
  10. J Cell Sci. 2019 Jan 16;132(2): [PMID: 30559251]
  11. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017 Apr;18(2):371-385 [PMID: 27830350]
  12. Science. 2021 Jul 2;373(6550): [PMID: 34210852]
  13. Hum Mutat. 2012 Apr;33(4):609-13 [PMID: 22294350]
  14. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019 Jan;27(1):114-124 [PMID: 30258123]
  15. Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Sep 1;99(3):595-606 [PMID: 27569544]
  16. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 Nov 28;884:381-8 [PMID: 10842608]
  17. Hear Res. 1994 Nov;80(2):209-15 [PMID: 7896579]
  18. J Clin Invest. 2011 Dec;121(12):4796-809 [PMID: 22105175]
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 May 28;99(11):7518-23 [PMID: 12032315]
  20. Neurobiol Aging. 2013 Aug;34(8):2077.e1-9 [PMID: 23540940]
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 8;117(49):31278-31289 [PMID: 33229591]
  22. Ann Hum Genet. 2016 Jan;80(1):38-49 [PMID: 26474449]
  23. Nat Methods. 2016 Feb;13(2):109-10 [PMID: 26820543]
  24. Nat Genet. 1994 Sep;8(1):77-81 [PMID: 7987396]
  25. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Jan;123(1):462-75 [PMID: 18177174]
  26. Nat Commun. 2020 May 13;11(1):2389 [PMID: 32404924]
  27. Clin Genet. 2007 Feb;71(2):148-52 [PMID: 17250663]
  28. Genome Biol. 2016 Jun 06;17(1):122 [PMID: 27268795]
  29. Hum Mutat. 2012 Apr;33(4):599-608 [PMID: 22290882]
  30. J Med Genet. 1969 Sep;6(3):233-54 [PMID: 5345095]
  31. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2013 Oct;14(5):687-701 [PMID: 23740184]
  32. Nature. 2020 May;581(7809):434-443 [PMID: 32461654]
  33. Commun Biol. 2021 Jun 9;4(1):706 [PMID: 34108613]
  34. PLoS Genet. 2020 Sep 28;16(9):e1009025 [PMID: 32986727]
  35. Hear Res. 2010 Jan;259(1-2):31-5 [PMID: 19781610]
  36. Gigascience. 2015 Feb 25;4:7 [PMID: 25722852]
  37. Hear Res. 2021 Oct;410:108347 [PMID: 34536825]
  38. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Nov 1;148(9):879-86 [PMID: 9801018]
  39. J Neurosci Res. 2020 Sep;98(9):1705-1720 [PMID: 32557661]
  40. Br Med Bull. 1961 Sep;17:251-4 [PMID: 13691133]
  41. Ear Hear. 2005 Feb;26(1):1-11 [PMID: 15692300]
  42. Cell. 2019 Jan 24;176(3):535-548.e24 [PMID: 30661751]
  43. Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 12;9(1):3691 [PMID: 30209249]
  44. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Feb;43(1):172-181 [PMID: 28703883]
  45. Commun Biol. 2022 Jun 3;5(1):540 [PMID: 35661827]
  46. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018 Oct 01;11:356 [PMID: 30327589]
  47. Hum Hered. 2020;85(1):1-10 [PMID: 33412546]
  48. Physiol Rev. 2017 Jan;97(1):1-37 [PMID: 27807199]
  49. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Aug;26(8):1167-1179 [PMID: 29725052]
  50. Am J Hum Genet. 2018 Oct 4;103(4):484-497 [PMID: 30245029]
  51. Nature. 2016 Sep 22;537(7621):508-514 [PMID: 27626380]
  52. BMC Genomics. 2019 Jul 16;20(Suppl 8):546 [PMID: 31307400]
  53. FASEB J. 2008 Feb;22(2):410-7 [PMID: 17846082]
  54. Cell Rep. 2019 Mar 12;26(11):3160-3171.e3 [PMID: 30865901]
  55. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Apr;60(4):758-64 [PMID: 9106521]
  56. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D886-D894 [PMID: 30371827]
  57. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Dec;53(12):2119-27 [PMID: 16398896]
  58. Front Mol Neurosci. 2019 Dec 20;12:316 [PMID: 31920542]
  59. Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Nov 1;186(9):1026-1034 [PMID: 28641372]
  60. Hum Mutat. 2018 Nov;39(11):1593-1613 [PMID: 30311386]
  61. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1997 Apr;40(2):444-52 [PMID: 9130212]
  62. EMBO Mol Med. 2016 Feb 08;8(3):191-207 [PMID: 26881968]
  63. Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Oct 3;105(4):788-802 [PMID: 31564434]
  64. Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):68-74 [PMID: 26432245]
  65. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Feb;119(2):156-61 [PMID: 8427676]
  66. Hear Res. 2010 Sep 1;268(1-2):114-22 [PMID: 20685243]
  67. Nat Methods. 2021 Aug;18(8):843-844 [PMID: 34172972]
  68. Am J Hum Genet. 2022 Jun 2;109(6):1077-1091 [PMID: 35580588]
  69. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Feb;97(2):1196-205 [PMID: 7876442]
  70. Nature. 2013 Jan 10;493(7431):216-20 [PMID: 23201682]
  71. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2016 Dec;17(6):493-523 [PMID: 27752925]
  72. PLoS Biol. 2019 Apr 11;17(4):e3000194 [PMID: 30973865]
  73. Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7831):749-756 [PMID: 33087929]
  74. Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7845):290-299 [PMID: 33568819]
  75. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022 Apr;23(2):253-272 [PMID: 35064426]
  76. Nat Genet. 2009 May;41(5):609-13 [PMID: 19363479]
  77. Science. 2021 Dec 03;374(6572):1221-1227 [PMID: 34855475]
  78. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jul;37(Web Server issue):W305-11 [PMID: 19465376]
  79. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2012 Sep 03;7:60 [PMID: 22938506]

Grants

  1. MC_PC_17228/Medical Research Council
  2. MC_QA137853/Medical Research Council
  3. P50 DC000422/NIDCD NIH HHS
  4. /Department of Health

MeSH Term

Aged
Animals
Biological Specimen Banks
Genome-Wide Association Study
Hearing
Humans
Mice
Presbycusis
Self Report
United Kingdom

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0hearingvariantsgenelossgenesdifficultyimpactcommongenetichumanimpairmentstudiesusingUKBiobankvariantlistsinvolvedadult-onsetunknownrarepresentassociatedstudysequencingself-reporteddifferentallelefrequencymanuallycuratedlisthighpredictedfoundanalysisprioritisationBACKGROUND:Age-relatedheterogeneousdiseasestrongcomponent100locireporteddateunderlyingremainfocussedfamilypatientcohortscreensgenome-wideassociationHowevercontributionpopulationintermediatefrequencieshardquantifymethodsresultlandscapevariationremainslargelyRESULTS:basedexomelarge-scalebiomedicaldatabasecarriedloadanalysesminorfilterscomparedresultingnearly700knownhumansand/ormicecutoff01combinedeffectivefiltersettingalsoseparatingparticipantssexproducedmarkedlyobtainedinvestigatedontologyannotationfunctionalexpressionidentifiedgoodcandidatesCONCLUSIONS:resultssuggestrelativelywellcontributeage-relatedcontributionsadultmaydiffersexesdeafnessusefulresourcecandidateInvestigatingcharacteristicsolderadultsAdultExomeHearingPredicted

Similar Articles

Cited By