Examination of care processes and treatment optimization for head and neck cancer patients in a community setting "hub and hub" model.

Harleen K Sethi, Elijah Walker, Travis Weinsheim, Matthew J Brennan, Christopher E Fundakowski
Author Information
  1. Harleen K Sethi: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Abington-Jefferson Health Willow Grove Pennsylvania USA.
  2. Elijah Walker: College of Applied Health Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana Illinois USA.
  3. Travis Weinsheim: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Abington-Jefferson Health Willow Grove Pennsylvania USA.
  4. Matthew J Brennan: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Abington-Jefferson Health Willow Grove Pennsylvania USA.
  5. Christopher E Fundakowski: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Abington-Jefferson Health Willow Grove Pennsylvania USA.

Abstract

Objective: To examine referral pattern, the timing of diagnostic/staging processes, and treatment initiation for new head and neck cancer patients in a community setting.
Methods: Patients with a newly diagnosed previously untreated diagnosis of head neck cancer managed at Asplundh Cancer Pavilion/Abington Memorial Hospital from October 2018 to March 2020. Source of referral and preceding workup were examined as well as intervals between initial head and neck consult and various timepoints of treatment initiation.
Results: One hundred and five patients were included in the study. The primary referral sources were external general otolaryngology (56.3%). Oral surgery and dermatology obtained tissue biopsy approximately 80% of the time before referral. The average time from the ordering of initial staging positron emission tomography/computed tomography to finalized results was 14 days (range: 10-25 days). Patients referred from dermatology and oral surgery were more likely to require single modality care, namely definitive surgical management. Time to treatment initiation average was 37 days (range: 29-41 days). Patients with longer treatment times noted significantly higher times to both radiation and medical oncology consults (48.42 vs. 18.13 days; ���<���0.001).
Conclusions: No notable differences in treatment initiation times were identified based on referral source or extent of workup performed before head/neck surgery consult. It appears the largest opportunities for improvement in terms of reducing overall treatment length exist in the optimization of radiation initiation time.

Keywords

References

  1. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Dec 29;44:57 [PMID: 26714893]
  2. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86 [PMID: 25220842]
  3. Head Neck. 2017 May;39(5):876-880 [PMID: 28236368]
  4. Laryngoscope. 2006 Jul;116(7):1093-106 [PMID: 16826042]
  5. Oral Oncol. 2019 Jan;88:39-48 [PMID: 30616795]
  6. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Feb 1;145(2):166-177 [PMID: 30383146]
  7. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 May 1;89(1):13-20 [PMID: 24613816]
  8. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2018 Nov;30(4):381-395 [PMID: 30078696]
  9. Med Care. 2017 May;55(5):506-513 [PMID: 28403012]
  10. Lancet. 2006 Sep 2;368(9538):843-54 [PMID: 16950362]
  11. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Mar 22;8(2):152-157 [PMID: 35782402]
  12. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jan 10;34(2):169-78 [PMID: 26628469]
  13. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2009 Sep;2(9):782-91 [PMID: 19737985]
  14. Head Neck. 2016 Apr;38 Suppl 1:E1544-53 [PMID: 26890807]
  15. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016 Fall;36(4):307-315 [PMID: 28350314]
  16. Laryngoscope. 2006 Sep;116(9 Pt 2 Suppl 111):1-13 [PMID: 16946667]
  17. Cancer. 2014 Nov 1;120(21):3353-60 [PMID: 25042524]
  18. Int J Integr Care. 2020 Jan 20;20(1):2 [PMID: 31997980]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0treatmentreferralinitiationheadnecktimedayscancerpatientsPatientssurgerytimesprocessescommunitysettingworkupinitialconsultdermatologyaveragerange:careradiationsourcelengthoptimizationObjective:examinepatterntimingdiagnostic/stagingnewMethods:newlydiagnosedpreviouslyuntreateddiagnosismanagedAsplundhCancerPavilion/AbingtonMemorialHospitalOctober2018March2020SourceprecedingexaminedwellintervalsvarioustimepointsResults:Onehundredfiveincludedstudyprimarysourcesexternalgeneralotolaryngology563%Oralobtainedtissuebiopsyapproximately80%orderingstagingpositronemissiontomography/computedtomographyfinalizedresults1410-25referredorallikelyrequiresinglemodalitynamelydefinitivesurgicalmanagementTime3729-41longernotedsignificantlyhighermedicaloncologyconsults4842 vs1813���<���0001Conclusions:notabledifferencesidentifiedbasedextentperformedhead/neckappearslargestopportunitiesimprovementtermsreducingoverallexistExamination"hubhub"modelpackagetotal

Similar Articles

Cited By