Effects of Different Bud Thinning Methods on Nutritional Quality and Antioxidant Activities of Fruiting Bodies of .

Lingyun Liu, Lupeng Wang, Xuefei Li, Shurui Zhu, Niangang Pan, Xin Wang, Changtian Li, Yu Li
Author Information
  1. Lingyun Liu: Engineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
  2. Lupeng Wang: Engineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
  3. Xuefei Li: Engineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
  4. Shurui Zhu: Engineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
  5. Niangang Pan: Engineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
  6. Xin Wang: Engineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
  7. Changtian Li: Engineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.
  8. Yu Li: Engineering Research Center of Edible and Medicinal Fungi, Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China.

Abstract

The cultivation of was studied by different methods, such as puncturing and fixed-point mushroom production, shading treatment at the top of the bag, and pulling the top of the bag. The agronomic characters, yield, nutritional components, and antioxidant activities of fruiting bodies of were determined. The results showed that the number of buds in the perforated treatment was less than that in the production method of traditional fruiting bodies to a certain extent. When a circular hole with a diameter of 1.5 cm was drilled in the perforated treatment, the number of buds was 5, which was less than that in the control group. The efficiency of artificial removal of buds was significantly higher than that of the control group, but the harvesting date was longer than that of other methods. The number of buds in shading treatment and bag opening treatment was significantly less than that in the control group, which could effectively control the number of buds and reduce the cost of manpower and material resources. In terms of nutritional components, the A3 treatment group with a hole diameter of 1.0 cm and a quantity of one had the highest crude protein content of 151.34 g, and a significant difference was observed in crude fiber content compared with other treatments. The extraction rate of B5 crude polysaccharide was the highest, and the extraction rate was 12.90%. The antioxidant activities increased with the increase of crude polysaccharide concentration. Using A3 treatment to cultivate fruiting bodies is conducive to meeting people's requirements for improving quality of life.

Keywords

References

  1. Food Res Int. 2021 Oct;148:110599 [PMID: 34507744]
  2. Carbohydr Res. 2015 Jan 12;401:24-31 [PMID: 25464078]
  3. Int J Med Mushrooms. 2012;14(3):211-39 [PMID: 22577974]
  4. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 Feb 15;123:945-956 [PMID: 30447375]
  5. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019 May 1;128:858-869 [PMID: 30716376]
  6. Carbohydr Polym. 2018 Nov 15;200:353-360 [PMID: 30177176]
  7. Arch Microbiol. 2013 Nov;195(10-11):749-57 [PMID: 24071733]
  8. Nutrition. 2021 Nov-Dec;91-92:111393 [PMID: 34399399]
  9. Pharmacol Res. 2022 Jan;175:105979 [PMID: 34798266]
  10. Med Res Rev. 2015 Sep;35(5):937-67 [PMID: 25850821]
  11. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018 Apr 1;109:65-75 [PMID: 29248551]
  12. Carbohydr Res. 2016 Apr 7;424:30-41 [PMID: 26974354]
  13. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 Oct 1;160:380-389 [PMID: 32446895]
  14. Carbohydr Polym. 2020 Feb 1;229:115407 [PMID: 31826485]
  15. Carbohydr Polym. 2020 Dec 15;250:116942 [PMID: 33049854]
  16. Food Chem. 2013 May 1;138(1):70-6 [PMID: 23265457]
  17. Carbohydr Polym. 2015 Sep 5;128:90-8 [PMID: 26005143]
  18. Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2224-60 [PMID: 23245609]
  19. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020 May 1;150:1342-1347 [PMID: 31759001]
  20. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Jan;32(1):125-133 [PMID: 34893403]
  21. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Dec;46:336-342 [PMID: 34857217]
  22. Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Oct;34(10):3211-7 [PMID: 23886762]
  23. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2020 Sep;19(5):2333-2356 [PMID: 33336985]
  24. Carbohydr Polym. 2014 Oct 13;111:324-32 [PMID: 25037358]
  25. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021 Mar 1;172:408-417 [PMID: 33465360]
  26. Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105688 [PMID: 34509543]
  27. J Hazard Mater. 2020 Dec 5;400:123156 [PMID: 32574879]
  28. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2022 Apr;48:87-98 [PMID: 35331539]
  29. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2022 Jun;49:522-528 [PMID: 35623861]
  30. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022 Mar;147:112621 [PMID: 35026489]
  31. Carbohydr Polym. 2017 Feb 10;157:1657-1665 [PMID: 27987880]
  32. Food Chem. 2022 Jun 1;378:132130 [PMID: 35033704]
  33. Food Chem Adv. 2022 Oct;1:100023 [PMID: 36686330]
  34. Biomedicines. 2020 Feb 20;8(2): [PMID: 32093399]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0treatmentbudsnumbercontrolgroupcrudebagnutritionalcomponentsantioxidantactivitiesfruitingbodieslessmethodsproductionshadingtopagronomiccharactersperforatedholediameter15cmsignificantlyA3highestcontentextractionratepolysaccharidecultivationstudieddifferentpuncturingfixed-pointmushroompullingyielddeterminedresultsshowedmethodtraditionalcertainextentcirculardrilledefficiencyartificialremovalhigherharvestingdatelongeropeningeffectivelyreducecostmanpowermaterialresourcesterms0quantityoneprotein15134gsignificantdifferenceobservedfibercomparedtreatmentsB51290%increasedincreaseconcentrationUsingcultivateconducivemeetingpeople'srequirementsimprovingqualitylifeEffectsDifferentBudThinningMethodsNutritionalQualityAntioxidantActivitiesFruitingBodiesPleurotuseryngii

Similar Articles

Cited By