Sensitivity of PCR analysis (melting curve method) in diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis (PTB) based on Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) by bronchoscope.

Jun Wei, Jun Sun, Xuefen Shuai, Junqing Ren, Xuedong Chen
Author Information
  1. Jun Wei: Jun Wei, Department of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Xuancheng People's Hospital, Xuancheng 242000, Anhui, China.
  2. Jun Sun: Jun Sun, Department of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Xuancheng People's Hospital, Xuancheng 242000, Anhui, China.
  3. Xuefen Shuai: Xuefen Shuai, Department of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Xuancheng People's Hospital, Xuancheng 242000, Anhui, China.
  4. Junqing Ren: Junqing Ren, Department of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Xuancheng People's Hospital, Xuancheng 242000, Anhui, China.
  5. Xuedong Chen: Xuedong Chen, Department of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Xuancheng People's Hospital, Xuancheng 242000, Anhui, China.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the sensitivity of the real-time PCR assay melting curve method in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) by analyzing bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) obtained from bronchoscopy.
Methods: A total of 214 PTB patients who were treated at Xuancheng People's Hospital respiratory and infection department during January 2018 to January 2021 were included in this study. Bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) examined by polymerase chain reaction (melting curve method), BALF smear, BALF culture, lipoarabinomannan (LAM) antigen test for diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) (LAM-TB), acid-fast stain (AFS), and serum adenosine deaminase (ADA) test were conducted respectively to compare their positive predictive values (PPVs).
Results: Of the 214 patients with confirmed PTB, 84.11% were BALF melting curve method positive, significantly higher than the positive results yielded by other PTB screening tests, i.e., LAM-TB (69.16%), AFS (51.87%), ADA (49.07%), BALF culture (62.15%), and BALF smear (41.12%) (p<0.05, respectively). The PPVs were increased to 92.06%, 93.93%, 92.99%, 95.79%, and 91.12% when BALF melting curve method was performed in combination with LAM-TB, AFS, ADA, BALF culture, and BALF smear, respectively, significantly higher than that produced by BALF melting curve method or the combined use of any two of the non-BALF melting curve method tests (p<0.05, respectively).
Conclusion: BALF melting curve method is an ideal diagnostic approach to PTB, which is of a higher diagnostic value compared with LAM-TB, AFS, ADA, BALF culture, and BALF smear.

Keywords

References

  1. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;39(3):271-285 [PMID: 30071543]
  2. Life Sci. 2020 Jul 1;252:117594 [PMID: 32305522]
  3. Lung Cancer. 2016 Dec;102:89-95 [PMID: 27987594]
  4. Curr Microbiol. 2017 Sep;74(9):1026-1032 [PMID: 28612135]
  5. BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Dec 19;19(1):1069 [PMID: 31856744]
  6. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 17;17(1):280 [PMID: 28415989]
  7. Semin Diagn Pathol. 2018 Sep;35(5):280-287 [PMID: 30173880]
  8. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2018 May 1;2018(5): [PMID: 29717051]
  9. Infect Dis Now. 2021 May;51(3):273-278 [PMID: 33069842]
  10. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2019 Jun 3;2019(6): [PMID: 31160389]
  11. Microbiol Spectr. 2017 Jan;5(1): [PMID: 28185620]
  12. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Oct 27;2:16076 [PMID: 27784885]
  13. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017 Oct 1;21(10):1150-1153 [PMID: 28911360]
  14. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015 Mar 21;8(3):e21760 [PMID: 25861440]
  15. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Mar 18;11:650163 [PMID: 33816355]
  16. Rev Pneumol Clin. 2016 Oct;72(5):320-325 [PMID: 27561975]
  17. ACS Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 14;6(2):272-280 [PMID: 31815418]
  18. BMC Res Notes. 2017 Sep 8;10(1):473 [PMID: 28886729]
  19. Am J Clin Pathol. 1994 Jun;101(6):738-41 [PMID: 7516118]
  20. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2018 Jun - Jul;36(6):366-374 [PMID: 29223319]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BALFmeltingcurvemethodPTBsmearcultureLAM-TBAFSADArespectivelyPCRdiagnosispositivehighertuberculosisbronchoalveolarlavagefluid214patientsJanuarytestTBPPVssignificantlytests12%p<00592diagnosticTuberculosisBronchoalveolarLavageObjectives:evaluatesensitivityreal-timeassaypulmonaryanalyzingobtainedbronchoscopyMethods:totaltreatedXuanchengPeople'sHospitalrespiratoryinfectiondepartment20182021includedstudyBronchoscopicexaminedpolymerasechainreactionlipoarabinomannanLAMantigenacid-faststainserumadenosinedeaminaseconductedcomparepredictivevaluesResults:confirmed8411%resultsyieldedscreeningie6916%5187%4907%6215%41increased06%9393%99%9579%91performedcombinationproducedcombinedusetwonon-BALFConclusion:idealapproachvaluecomparedSensitivityanalysisPulmonarybasedBALbronchoscopeFluidBronchoscopyPolymeraseChainReaction

Similar Articles

Cited By