Obstetric fistula repair failure and its associated factors among women underwent repair in Yirgalem Hamlin fistula center, Sidama Regional State, Southern Ethiopia, 2021: a retrospective cross sectional study.

Shimelis Tadesse, Neway Ejigu, Dejene Edosa, Tebeje Ashegu, Dubale Dulla
Author Information
  1. Shimelis Tadesse: Department of Midwifery, College of Health Sciences, Mettu University, P.O. Box: 318, Mettu, Ethiopia. tgdest6@gmail.com.
  2. Neway Ejigu: Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Madda Walabu University, P.O. Box: 247, Bale Robe, Ethiopia.
  3. Dejene Edosa: Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Salale University, P.O. Box: 245, Fiche, Ethiopia.
  4. Tebeje Ashegu: Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, P.O. Box: 1560, Hawassa, Ethiopia.
  5. Dubale Dulla: Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University, P.O. Box: 1560, Hawassa, Ethiopia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obstetric fistula repair failure is a combination of unsuccessful fistula closure and/or incontinence following a successful closure. It causes a burden on both the patients and the fistula centers. The aim of this study was to assess the magnitude and associated factors of obstetric fistula repair failure among women who underwent fistula repair at Yirgalem Hamlin fistula center in Southern Ethiopia.
METHODS: A facility-based retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted among women who underwent fistula repair at Yirgalem Hamlin fistula center, Southern Ethiopia, during the period from January 2016 to December 2020. All 562 women who underwent fistula repair in the last 5 years were included in the study. The data were collected using a pre-tested checklist from September 22 to October 22, 2021. The data were then imported into EPI info-data version 3.1, exported to SPSS version 25, and analyzed. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed, and the significant statistical test was assessed at a 95% confidence interval. Variables with a p value of < 0.05 in multivariable logistic regression were regarded to have a statistically significant relationship.
RESULTS: The magnitude of obstetric fistula repair failure in this study was 28.8%. Obstetric fistula repair failure was found to be associated with labor duration > 48 h (AOR = 2.037; 95% CI 1.268, 3.272), Goh Type 4 fistulas (AOR = 3.939; 95% CI 1.623, 9.560), fistula size > 3 cm (AOR = 6.627; 95% CI 3.802, 11.554), completely destructed urethra (AOR = 3.192; 95% CI 1.234, 8.256), and bladder catheterization > 14 days (AOR = 2.944; 95% CI 1.380, 6.281).
CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of obstetric fistula repair failure was significantly higher than the World Health Organization standard. Obstetric fistula repair failure had a positive association with a longer duration of labor, Goh Type 4 fistulas, large fistula size, total urethral injury, and a longer period of bladder catheterization. Therefore, the concerned bodies need to implement interventions on factors affecting obstetric fistula repair failure to reduce or prevent the failure of obstetric fistula repair.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Urol. 2018 Jan;25(1):25-29 [PMID: 28762575]
  2. BMC Urol. 2011 Dec 07;11:23 [PMID: 22151960]
  3. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Dec;19(12):1659-62 [PMID: 18690403]
  4. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Jul;90(7):753-60 [PMID: 21542810]
  5. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Aug;26(8):1209-12 [PMID: 25800903]
  6. Reprod Health. 2016 Nov 8;13(1):135 [PMID: 27821123]
  7. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Dec;44(6):502-4 [PMID: 15598284]
  8. R I Med J (2013). 2019 Sep 3;102(7):21-24 [PMID: 31480814]
  9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;200(5):578.e1-4 [PMID: 19200932]
  10. Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Jun;20(6):813-9 [PMID: 25706671]
  11. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015 Sep;65(9):954-9 [PMID: 26338740]
  12. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 May;153(2):294-299 [PMID: 33164206]
  13. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Sep;32(9):2473-2482 [PMID: 33416963]
  14. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jan;33(1):30-35 [PMID: 21272433]
  15. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Aug;142(2):187-193 [PMID: 29705989]
  16. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Dec 12;8:774 [PMID: 26654111]
  17. Urology. 2016 Nov;97:80-85 [PMID: 27496296]
  18. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Feb;120(2):178-82 [PMID: 23141371]
  19. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007 Nov;99 Suppl 1:S117-21 [PMID: 17880979]
  20. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2013 May;16(2):45-55 [PMID: 28191174]
  21. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019 Dec;41(12):1726-1733 [PMID: 30987849]
  22. BMC Urol. 2016 Jul 12;16(1):41 [PMID: 27406310]
  23. Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Oct 16;34:91 [PMID: 31934234]
  24. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Sep;120(3):524-31 [PMID: 22914460]

MeSH Term

Cross-Sectional Studies
Ethiopia
Female
Fistula
Humans
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies
Urinary Incontinence

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fistularepairfailure95%Obstetricstudyobstetric1CIwomenunderwentcenterSouthernEthiopiamagnitudeassociatedfactorsamongYirgalemHamlin3closureretrospectiveperioddata22versionlogisticregressionsignificantlaborAOR = 2GohType4fistulasAOR = 3bladderlongerBACKGROUND:combinationunsuccessfuland/orincontinencefollowingsuccessfulcausesburdenpatientscentersaimassessMETHODS:facility-basedcross-sectionalconductedJanuary2016December2020562last5 yearsincludedcollectedusingpre-testedchecklistSeptemberOctober2021importedEPIinfo-dataexportedSPSS25analyzedDescriptiveanalysesperformedstatisticaltestassessedconfidenceintervalVariablespvalueof < 005multivariableregardedstatisticallyrelationshipRESULTS:288%foundduration > 48 h0372682729396239560size > 3 cmAOR = 662780211554completelydestructedurethra1922348256catheterization > 14 days9443806281CONCLUSIONS:significantlyhigherWorldHealthOrganizationstandardpositiveassociationdurationlargesizetotalurethralinjurycatheterizationThereforeconcernedbodiesneedimplementinterventionsaffectingreducepreventSidamaRegionalState2021:crosssectionalFistula

Similar Articles

Cited By