Prevalence of Livestock-Associated MRSA ST398 in a Swine Slaughterhouse in Guangzhou, China.

Xiaoshen Li, Longfei Xie, Honghao Huang, Zhi Li, Guihua Li, Peng Liu, Danyu Xiao, Xucai Zhang, Wenguang Xiong, Zhenling Zeng
Author Information
  1. Xiaoshen Li: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
  2. Longfei Xie: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
  3. Honghao Huang: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
  4. Zhi Li: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
  5. Guihua Li: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
  6. Peng Liu: College of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.
  7. Danyu Xiao: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
  8. Xucai Zhang: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
  9. Wenguang Xiong: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
  10. Zhenling Zeng: Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.

Abstract

Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant (LA-MRSA) is an important zoonotic microorganism that is increasingly causing public health concern worldwide. The objective of this study was to determine the transmission and occurrence of MRSA in a slaughterhouse environment and evaluate its antimicrobial resistance and genetic characterization. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive epidemiological survey of by typing and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of samples obtained from the pork production chain, the environment, and community residents. To clarify the evolutionary relationships of MRSA sequence type (ST) 398 in this study and global isolates, 197 published whole-genome sequences data of MRSA ST398 strains were downloaded from the GenBank database and included in the phylogenetic analysis. A total of 585 porcine samples (snout and carcass swabs), 78 human nasal samples, and 136 environmental samples were collected. The MRSA isolates were detected at higher frequencies in samples from swine (15.0%) than carcasses (10.0%), slaughterhouse workers (8.0%), community residents (0%), and environment samples (5.9%). The typing results showed that t571 accounted for a higher proportion than other types. Closely related isolates from the samples of swine, slaughterhouse workers, carcasses, carrier vehicle, and surrounding fishpond water indicate that MRSA ST398 strains may spread among swine, humans, and the environment. MRSA ST398-t571 isolates were genetically different from global strains, except for two Korean isolates, which showed genetic closeness with it. In addition, a MRSA ST398 isolate recovered from an infected patient in Europe differed by only 31 SNPs from the airborne dust-associated strain isolated in this study, thereby suggesting potential transmission among different countries. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results demonstrated that 99.0% (96/97) of MRSA and 95.1% (231/243) of methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) showed multidrug-resistant (MDR) phenotypes. According to WGS analysis, the -carrying segment (IS--IS-IS) was reported in MRSA ST398 isolates for the first time. The coexistence of and in a plasmid was first detected in MRSA ST398. The potential transmission of MRSA among humans, animals, and the environment is a cause for concern. The emergence and transmission of LA-MRSA ST398 with high levels of resistance profiles highlight the urgent need for LA-MRSA surveillance.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004 Feb;23(2):113-9 [PMID: 15013035]
  2. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018 Jan;24(1):153-154 [PMID: 29260680]
  3. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015 Apr;45(4):334-40 [PMID: 25593014]
  4. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2016 Jun;30(2):377-390 [PMID: 27208764]
  5. J Clin Microbiol. 2013 Jul;51(7):2443-7 [PMID: 23658269]
  6. Front Microbiol. 2019 Nov 26;10:2733 [PMID: 31849885]
  7. Genome Biol. 2014;15(11):524 [PMID: 25410596]
  8. Front Microbiol. 2017 Mar 21;8:455 [PMID: 28377752]
  9. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2022 Feb;9(4):e2103388 [PMID: 34894204]
  10. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 May;11(5):711-4 [PMID: 15890125]
  11. Bioinformatics. 2011 Apr 1;27(7):1009-10 [PMID: 21278367]
  12. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jul 1;33(Web Server issue):W728-33 [PMID: 15980573]
  13. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009 Dec;64(6):1156-64 [PMID: 19808235]
  14. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013 Aug;68(8):1697-706 [PMID: 23543608]
  15. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Jan;14(1):29-34 [PMID: 17986212]
  16. Front Microbiol. 2021 Jan 08;11:575321 [PMID: 33488532]
  17. Int J Med Microbiol. 2014 May;304(3-4):379-83 [PMID: 24418357]
  18. J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Dec;41(12):5442-8 [PMID: 14662923]
  19. mSphere. 2018 Feb 14;3(1): [PMID: 29468193]
  20. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Mar;57(3):1524-8 [PMID: 23274660]
  21. Pathogens. 2021 May 14;10(5): [PMID: 34069037]
  22. Animals (Basel). 2021 Mar 08;11(3): [PMID: 33800204]
  23. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jan;42(Database issue):D206-14 [PMID: 24293654]
  24. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Feb;46(2):163-172 [PMID: 31701205]
  25. Microorganisms. 2020 Nov 29;8(12): [PMID: 33260448]
  26. Genome Med. 2014 Nov 20;6(11):90 [PMID: 25422674]
  27. Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 1;26(5):589-95 [PMID: 20080505]
  28. mBio. 2018 Nov 13;9(6): [PMID: 30425152]
  29. J Infect Dis. 2020 Mar 16;221(Suppl 2):S220-S228 [PMID: 32176793]
  30. Euro Surveill. 2015 Apr 30;20(17): [PMID: 25955776]
  31. Euro Surveill. 2017 Nov;22(44): [PMID: 29113628]
  32. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Nov;67(11):2640-4 [PMID: 22782487]
  33. PLoS One. 2018 Oct 9;13(10):e0204977 [PMID: 30300375]
  34. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Feb 2;77(2):331-337 [PMID: 35076077]
  35. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 May 1;73(5):1194-1200 [PMID: 29425282]
  36. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Oct 1;73(10):2652-2661 [PMID: 29986036]
  37. Euro Surveill. 2015;20(37): [PMID: 26535590]
  38. Vet Microbiol. 2011 Sep 28;152(3-4):420-3 [PMID: 21664077]
  39. Vet Microbiol. 2017 Oct;210:43-48 [PMID: 29103695]
  40. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Feb;51(2):275-276 [PMID: 29122698]
  41. J Dairy Sci. 2020 Dec;103(12):11806-11819 [PMID: 33041041]
  42. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 1;63(11):1431-1438 [PMID: 27516381]
  43. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Aug;70(8):2182-90 [PMID: 25977397]
  44. BMC Genomics. 2011 Aug 08;12:402 [PMID: 21824423]
  45. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Jul;50(7):2500-5 [PMID: 16801432]
  46. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Aug;16(8):1330 [PMID: 20678343]
  47. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018 Jul 1;73(7):1763-1769 [PMID: 29635422]
  48. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019 Jul;54(1):8-15 [PMID: 30959181]
  49. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Apr;26(4):795-797 [PMID: 32186509]
  50. Food Microbiol. 2021 Feb;93:103603 [PMID: 32912578]
  51. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Feb 1;75(2):484-486 [PMID: 31670809]
  52. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Jun;71(6):1474-8 [PMID: 26953332]
  53. Microb Genom. 2017 Jan 31;3(1):e000105 [PMID: 28348878]
  54. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Dec 1;75(12):3471-3474 [PMID: 32797238]
  55. Environ Int. 2018 Jan;110:160-172 [PMID: 29107352]
  56. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 Feb;15(2):285-7 [PMID: 19193274]
  57. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2016 May-Jun;26(3):263-9 [PMID: 25515375]
  58. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2015 Jul;12(7):598-605 [PMID: 25974310]
  59. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 Dec;11(12):1965-6 [PMID: 16485492]
  60. Nat Methods. 2013 Jun;10(6):563-9 [PMID: 23644548]
  61. J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Nov;42(11):4947-55 [PMID: 15528678]
  62. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Dec;80(23):7275-82 [PMID: 25239891]
  63. BMC Microbiol. 2019 Feb 26;19(1):51 [PMID: 30808302]
  64. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Apr;24(4):350-354 [PMID: 29309930]
  65. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011 Jun;17(6):1152-3; author reply 1153 [PMID: 21749803]
  66. Front Microbiol. 2018 Nov 27;9:2925 [PMID: 30538695]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MRSAST398samplesisolatesenvironment0%studytransmissionslaughterhouseswineLA-MRSAresistancetypingwhole-genomestrainsshowedamongpublichealthconcerngeneticsequencingWGScommunityresidentsglobalanalysisdetectedhighercarcassesworkersresultshumansdifferentpotentialfirstLivestock-associatedmethicillin-resistantimportantzoonoticmicroorganismincreasinglycausingworldwideobjectivedetermineoccurrenceevaluateantimicrobialcharacterizationconductedcomprehensiveepidemiologicalsurveyobtainedporkproductionchainclarifyevolutionaryrelationshipssequencetypeST398197publishedsequencesdatadownloadedGenBankdatabaseincludedphylogenetictotal585porcinesnoutcarcassswabs78humannasal136environmentalcollectedfrequencies1510859%t571accountedproportiontypesCloselyrelatedcarriervehiclesurroundingfishpondwaterindicatemayspreadST398-t571geneticallyexcepttwoKoreanclosenessadditionisolaterecoveredinfectedpatientEuropediffered31SNPsairbornedust-associatedstrainisolatedtherebysuggestingcountriesAntimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingdemonstrated9996/97951%231/243methicillin-sensitiveMSSAmultidrug-resistantMDRphenotypesAccording-carryingsegmentIS--IS-ISreportedtimecoexistenceplasmidanimalscauseemergencehighlevelsprofileshighlighturgentneedsurveillancePrevalenceLivestock-AssociatedSwineSlaughterhouseGuangzhouChinamulti-drugspa

Similar Articles

Cited By