A colony-level optimization model provides a potential mechanism for the evolution of novel castes in eusocial ant colonies.

Suryadeepto Nag, Ananda Shikhara Bhat
Author Information
  1. Suryadeepto Nag: Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, Pune, 411008, Maharashtra, India.
  2. Ananda Shikhara Bhat: Department of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Pune, Pune, 411008, Maharashtra, India.

Abstract

Ant species often have multiple morphologically distinct 'castes' within a single colony. Given that most of these castes are involved in non-reproductive tasks, and since such individuals thus never reproduce, the question of how ant castes can evolve is a non-trivial one. Over the years, several models have been proposed in order to explain the evolution of castes in ant colonies. Here, we attempt to answer this question using an economics-based approach, developing an optimization model that implements adaptation and selection at the colony level. We argue that due to the nature of ant colonies, selection is shifted to the group level, and, due to this, individual ants are sheltered from negative selection. We show that our framework can explain the evolution of novel castes in ant colonies, and discuss the novelty of our model with regard to previous models that have been proposed. We also show that our model is consistent with several empirical observations of ant colonies.

Keywords

References

  1. Endeavour. 2005 Mar;29(1):43-7 [PMID: 15749153]
  2. Parasitology. 2013 Jun;140(7):825-32 [PMID: 23442525]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 3;102 Suppl 1:6543-9 [PMID: 15851679]
  4. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1996 Feb;71(1):27-79 [PMID: 8603120]
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 5;104(23):9736-40 [PMID: 17517608]
  6. Monogr Popul Biol. 1978;12:1-352 [PMID: 740003]
  7. Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 24;10(1):3339 [PMID: 32094370]
  8. Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7824):239-244 [PMID: 32879485]
  9. Q Rev Biol. 2007 Dec;82(4):327-48 [PMID: 18217526]
  10. Parasitol Res. 2014 Jul;113(7):2593-602 [PMID: 24770673]
  11. Evodevo. 2015 Dec 01;6:36 [PMID: 26629324]
  12. Ecol Evol. 2018 Jan 03;8(3):1615-1625 [PMID: 29435237]
  13. Am Nat. 2012 Sep;180(3):328-41 [PMID: 22854076]
  14. J Evol Biol. 2009 Apr;22(4):659-71 [PMID: 19210588]
  15. Nature. 2000 Jul 13;406(6792):183-6 [PMID: 10910357]
  16. Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Oct 22;281(1793): [PMID: 25165765]
  17. Trends Ecol Evol. 2021 Aug;36(8):671-673 [PMID: 34226080]
  18. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Mar 7;278(1706):656-65 [PMID: 20851830]
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 7;109(6):E326-35 [PMID: 22308336]
  20. Commun Integr Biol. 2010 Jul;3(4):360-2 [PMID: 20798827]
  21. Trends Ecol Evol. 2021 Aug;36(8):668-670 [PMID: 33962801]
  22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3634-8 [PMID: 20133582]
  23. J Evol Biol. 2013 Mar;26(3):509-16 [PMID: 23252707]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0antcoloniescastesmodelselectionevolutionAntcolonyquestioncanseveralmodelsproposedexplainoptimizationleveldueshownovelspeciesoftenmultiplemorphologicallydistinct'castes'withinsingleGiveninvolvednon-reproductivetaskssinceindividualsthusneverreproduceevolvenon-trivialoneyearsorderattemptanswerusingeconomics-basedapproachdevelopingimplementsadaptationarguenatureshiftedgroupindividualantsshelterednegativeframeworkdiscussnoveltyregardpreviousalsoconsistentempiricalobservationscolony-levelprovidespotentialmechanismeusocialCasteratioEusocialityEvolutionGroupOptimization

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.