Enhanced mismatch negativity in harmonic compared with inharmonic sounds.

David Ricardo Quiroga-Martinez, Krzysztof Basi��ski, Jonathan Nasielski, Barbara Tillmann, Elvira Brattico, Fanny Cholvy, Lesly Fornoni, Peter Vuust, Anne Caclin
Author Information
  1. David Ricardo Quiroga-Martinez: Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. ORCID
  2. Krzysztof Basi��ski: Division of Quality of Life Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Gda��sk, Gda��sk, Poland. ORCID
  3. Jonathan Nasielski: University College Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  4. Barbara Tillmann: Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS, UMR5292; INSERM, U1028, Lyon, France.
  5. Elvira Brattico: Center for Music in the Brain, Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music, Aarhus, Denmark.
  6. Fanny Cholvy: Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS, UMR5292; INSERM, U1028, Lyon, France.
  7. Lesly Fornoni: Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS, UMR5292; INSERM, U1028, Lyon, France.
  8. Peter Vuust: Center for Music in the Brain, Aarhus University & The Royal Academy of Music, Aarhus, Denmark.
  9. Anne Caclin: Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS, UMR5292; INSERM, U1028, Lyon, France.

Abstract

Many natural sounds have frequency spectra composed of integer multiples of a fundamental frequency. This property, known as harmonicity, plays an important role in auditory information processing. However, the extent to which harmonicity influences the processing of sound features beyond pitch is still unclear. This is interesting because harmonic sounds have lower information entropy than inharmonic sounds. According to predictive processing accounts of perception, this property could produce more salient neural responses due to the brain's weighting of sensory signals according to their uncertainty. In the present study, we used electroencephalography to investigate brain responses to harmonic and inharmonic sounds commonly occurring in music: Piano tones and hi-hat cymbal sounds. In a multifeature oddball paradigm, we measured mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a responses to timbre, intensity, and location deviants in listeners with and without congenital amusia-an impairment of pitch processing. As hypothesized, we observed larger amplitudes and earlier latencies (for both MMN and P3a) in harmonic compared with inharmonic sounds. These harmonicity effects were modulated by sound feature. Moreover, the difference in P3a latency between harmonic and inharmonic sounds was larger for controls than amusics. We propose an explanation of these results based on predictive coding and discuss the relationship between harmonicity, information entropy, and precision weighting of prediction errors.

Keywords

References

  1. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Jan;115(1):140-4 [PMID: 14706481]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 27;109(48):19858-63 [PMID: 23150582]
  3. Scand Audiol. 1985;14(3):125-31 [PMID: 4059850]
  4. J Neurosci. 2015 Mar 4;35(9):3815-24 [PMID: 25740512]
  5. Nat Commun. 2018 May 29;9(1):2122 [PMID: 29844313]
  6. Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Jun;49(12):1597-1609 [PMID: 30589481]
  7. Brain Cogn. 2009 Dec;71(3):259-64 [PMID: 19762140]
  8. Front Neurosci. 2019 Oct 30;13:1165 [PMID: 31736698]
  9. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Feb 15;40(3):855-867 [PMID: 30381866]
  10. Int J Psychophysiol. 2012 Feb;83(2):132-43 [PMID: 22047947]
  11. J Neurosci. 2016 Mar 9;36(10):2986-94 [PMID: 26961952]
  12. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;23(1):63-77 [PMID: 30471869]
  13. Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:446-60 [PMID: 24161808]
  14. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 May 19;370(1668): [PMID: 25823866]
  15. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008 Jul;119(7):1515-23 [PMID: 18468482]
  16. Cortex. 2011 Oct;47(9):1091-8 [PMID: 21621766]
  17. Cortex. 2019 Nov;120:181-200 [PMID: 31323458]
  18. Am Sci. 1974 Mar-Apr;62(2):208-15 [PMID: 4815736]
  19. J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 26;32(39):13335-8 [PMID: 23015422]
  20. J Cogn Neurosci. 2023 May 1;35(5):765-780 [PMID: 36802367]
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 26;104(52):20961-6 [PMID: 18087046]
  22. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Nov;20(11):857-867 [PMID: 27692992]
  23. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Mar;120(3):453-63 [PMID: 19181570]
  24. Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 15;6:39236 [PMID: 27976708]
  25. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25(3-4):241-9 [PMID: 17943002]
  26. Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Jun;51(11):2250-2269 [PMID: 31891423]
  27. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 May;60(2):172-85 [PMID: 16510201]
  28. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Nov;999:58-75 [PMID: 14681118]
  29. J Neurosci. 2022 Jan 19;42(3):474-486 [PMID: 34819342]
  30. Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Sep;56(5):4583-4599 [PMID: 35833941]
  31. Brain Cogn. 2013 Apr;81(3):337-44 [PMID: 23434917]
  32. Nat Neurosci. 1999 Jan;2(1):79-87 [PMID: 10195184]
  33. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Apr 29;360(1456):815-36 [PMID: 15937014]
  34. Psychophysiology. 1981 Sep;18(5):493-513 [PMID: 7280146]
  35. Brain. 2013 May;136(Pt 5):1639-61 [PMID: 23616587]
  36. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Dec;118(12):2544-90 [PMID: 17931964]
  37. Neuropsychologia. 2021 Jul 30;158:107911 [PMID: 34102187]
  38. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Apr;84(3):1016-1042 [PMID: 35102502]
  39. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Feb;50(3):367-78 [PMID: 22201556]
  40. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 May;88(2):109-23 [PMID: 23542165]

MeSH Term

Acoustic Stimulation
Auditory Perception
Brain
Electroencephalography
Evoked Potentials, Auditory
Music
Pitch Perception
Sound

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0soundsharmonicityharmonicinharmonicprocessinginformationpitchperceptionresponsesP3afrequencypropertyauditorysoundentropypredictiveweightingmismatchnegativityMMNlargercomparedManynaturalspectracomposedintegermultiplesfundamentalknownplaysimportantroleHoweverextentinfluencesfeaturesbeyondstillunclearinterestinglowerAccordingaccountsproducesalientneuralduebrain'ssensorysignalsaccordinguncertaintypresentstudyusedelectroencephalographyinvestigatebraincommonlyoccurringmusic:Pianotoneshi-hatcymbalmultifeatureoddballparadigmmeasuredtimbreintensitylocationdeviantslistenerswithoutcongenitalamusia-animpairmenthypothesizedobservedamplitudesearlierlatencieseffectsmodulatedfeatureMoreoverdifferencelatencycontrolsamusicsproposeexplanationresultsbasedcodingdiscussrelationshipprecisionpredictionerrorsEnhancedamusiaevent-relatedpotentials

Similar Articles

Cited By