Implementation of falls risk evaluation at one-year after total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.

Tony Adebero, Pavlos Bobos, Lyndsay Somerville, James Howard, Edward M Vasarhelyi, Brent Lanting, Susan W Hunter
Author Information
  1. Tony Adebero: Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
  2. Pavlos Bobos: Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
  3. Lyndsay Somerville: Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
  4. James Howard: Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
  5. Edward M Vasarhelyi: Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
  6. Brent Lanting: Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
  7. Susan W Hunter: Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada. susan.hunter@uwo.ca.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research has demonstrated an increased risk of falls after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Yet, People's knowledge on falls risk factors and how falls prevention strategies are being used after THA have not been examined. If a person's knowledge of falls and self-efficacy about falls prevention strategies is low this would indicate a pressing need for interventions to lessen risk. The study objectives were: 1) to determine the falls knowledge and what fall prevention strategies People used after (THA) and 2) to determine the outcomes of a falls risk assessment at 12-months after unilateral THA.
METHODS: Overall, 108 People completed the falls Risk for Older People - Community Setting (FROP-Com) scale, a falls questionnaire (covered occurrence of falls, knowledge on falls risk factors, falls prevention strategies implemented after THA surgery), 6-m Walk Test (6mWT), 30-Second Chair Stand Test (30CST), Timed-up and Go (TUG) Test, and Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC).
RESULTS: Twenty-five (23.2%) People fell at least once in the 12 months after THA. Scores on the FROP-Com ranged from 2-20 with an average of 8.2 ± 3.6 indicating a mild falls risk. The importance of falling compared to other health concerns was rated as moderate to high (6.8 ± 2.9) and the majority of participants (n = 98, 90.7%) believed falls can be prevented after THA. Total scores on the ABC scale ranged from 30.6% to 100.0% with an average score of 84.4 ± 15.5%, indicating high function. Only 47 People (43.5%) reported receiving falls prevention education. A total of 101 falls prevention strategies were completed by 67 People (62%), the most common strategy was environmental modifications (e.g., installation of grab bars) at 37.4%, while exercise was mentioned by only 2%. The majority of People had functional deficits in 30CST (62%) and TUG (76.9%) at 12-months after unilateral THA.
CONCLUSIONS: Almost a quarter of the sample had experienced a fall in the 12-months after THA and functional deficits were common. The majority of the sample had proactively implemented falls prevention strategies after the surgery. Yet importantly, People after THA had limited exposure to falls prevention education and implemented a limited range of prevention strategies.

Keywords

References

  1. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(3):91-6 [PMID: 20128332]
  2. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Oct;87(10):1337-43 [PMID: 16189304]
  3. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009 Dec;13(10):881-9 [PMID: 19924348]
  4. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7):2268-2272 [PMID: 29526333]
  5. Phys Ther. 2002 Feb;82(2):128-37 [PMID: 11856064]
  6. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Nov;85(11 Suppl):S98-118; quiz S119-23 [PMID: 17079984]
  7. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Jun;16(3):230-4 [PMID: 17545352]
  8. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Sep;53(9):1618-22 [PMID: 16137297]
  9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):654-64 [PMID: 23817756]
  10. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9 [PMID: 15817019]
  11. Physiother Res Int. 2008 Sep;13(3):141-52 [PMID: 18697226]
  12. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Sep;82(9):669-77 [PMID: 12960908]
  13. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Aug;42(16):2252-2261 [PMID: 30686062]
  14. Gerontologist. 2011 Oct;51(5):653-62 [PMID: 21593009]
  15. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Mar;(384):189-97 [PMID: 11249165]
  16. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 May;67(5):633-9 [PMID: 25331686]
  17. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016 May;16(5):570-6 [PMID: 25981682]
  18. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998 Jul;53(4):M287-94 [PMID: 18314568]
  19. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991 Feb;39(2):142-8 [PMID: 1991946]
  20. Phys Ther. 1998 Dec;78(12):1262-76 [PMID: 9859946]
  21. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2016;26(2):123-132 [PMID: 28094736]
  22. BMC Geriatr. 2007 Jul 04;7:17 [PMID: 17610735]
  23. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Dec;53(12):2190-4 [PMID: 16398908]
  24. Qual Life Res. 2009 Aug;18(6):727-35 [PMID: 19424821]
  25. PM R. 2017 Feb;9(2):170-180.e1 [PMID: 27485674]
  26. J Orthop. 2019 Nov 13;19:36-40 [PMID: 32021033]
  27. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Jan;50A(1):M28-34 [PMID: 7814786]
  28. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Jul;27(7):979-993 [PMID: 31028883]
  29. Epidemiology. 2010 Sep;21(5):658-68 [PMID: 20585256]
  30. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002 Jan;57(1):M47-51 [PMID: 11773212]
  31. Age Ageing. 2008 Nov;37(6):634-9 [PMID: 18565980]
  32. J Biomech. 2007;40(15):3432-7 [PMID: 17644101]
  33. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Oct;45(5):453-61 [PMID: 11642645]
  34. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Jan;59(1):148-57 [PMID: 21226685]
  35. Physiotherapy. 2014 Dec;100(4):325-30 [PMID: 24602831]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fallsTHApreventionriskstrategiespeopleknowledgetotal12-monthsimplementedTestmajorityhiparthroplastyYetfactorsusedstudydeterminefallunilateralcompletedFROP-Comscalesurgery30CSTTUGABC2%rangedaverage6indicatinghigh5%education62%commonfunctionaldeficitssamplelimitedBACKGROUND:Researchdemonstratedincreasedpeople'sexaminedperson'sself-efficacylowindicatepressingneedinterventionslessenobjectiveswere:12outcomesassessmentMETHODS:Overall108FallsRiskOlderPeople-CommunitySettingquestionnairecoveredoccurrence6-mWalk6mWT30-SecondChairStandTimed-upGoActivities-specificBalanceConfidenceScaleRESULTS:Twenty-five23fellleast12 monthsScores2-2082 ± 3mildimportancefallingcomparedhealthconcernsratedmoderate8 ± 29participantsn = 98907%believedcanpreventedTotalscores306%1000%score844 ± 15function4743reportedreceiving10167strategyenvironmentalmodificationseginstallationgrabbars374%exercisementioned769%CONCLUSIONS:AlmostquarterexperiencedproactivelyimportantlyexposurerangeImplementationevaluationone-yeararthroplasty:cross-sectionalAccidentalAgedHipOsteoarthritis

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)