Psychological Distress Among Infertility Patients: A Network Analysis.

Danfeng Cao, Caifeng Bai, Guoxiang Zhang
Author Information
  1. Danfeng Cao: Department of Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.
  2. Caifeng Bai: School of Nursing, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China.
  3. Guoxiang Zhang: Department of Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.

Abstract

Background: Psychological distress is common among infertility patients. Total scale scores are often used to represent the severity of anxiety, depression, or stress, which ignores important differences between specific symptoms, and relationships between symptoms. This study aimed to identify patterns of psychological distress experienced by infertility patients and to identify the most central symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress.
Method: From June to September 2016, 740 infertility patients were included in this cross-sectional study. Infertility patients were asked to complete the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, Patients Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and Fertility Problem Inventory. Network analysis was used to examine the patterns of psychological distress in infertility patients and to test the most central symptoms of anxiety, depression, and stress.
Results: Restlessness was the most central symptom in infertility patients. "Feelings of guilt" had the highest strength among PHQ-9 symptoms. "Relationship concern stress" and "sexual concern stress" had the strongest connections in the network. Stability estimation indicated that the order of node strength centrality was more stable than the order of closeness and betweenness (the CS-coefficients were 0.75, 0.13, and 0.67, respectively). In addition, network structure and global strength were invariant across gender.
Limitations: The cross-sectional design did not permit identification of causal relationships. Patients in this study were recruited from one reproductive hospital; especially, most patients had low socioeconomic status, which limits generalizability of the findings.
Conclusion: This study reinforces the need to better understand the underlying causes of psychological distress in infertile patients. A more detailed investigation of the relationship between these symptoms could provide information for psychosocial interventions aimed beyond "alleviating psychological distress." We should consider the individual psychological symptom pattern and its potential causes in infertility patients instead of assuming a consistent psychological distress structure.

Keywords

References

  1. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2002 Jan-Feb;23(1):31-41 [PMID: 11887609]
  2. World Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;16(1):5-13 [PMID: 28127906]
  3. Hum Reprod Update. 2007 Jan-Feb;13(1):27-36 [PMID: 16940360]
  4. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:179098 [PMID: 24369006]
  5. J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Apr;126(3):340-354 [PMID: 28277735]
  6. J Sex Med. 2009 Nov;6(11):2997-3007 [PMID: 19570044]
  7. BMC Med. 2015 Apr 06;13:72 [PMID: 25879936]
  8. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13 [PMID: 11556941]
  9. Hum Reprod. 2019 Jul 8;34(7):1235-1248 [PMID: 31242506]
  10. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7 [PMID: 16717171]
  11. J Affect Disord. 2012 Sep;140(1):75-81 [PMID: 22406338]
  12. Hum Reprod. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):582-587 [PMID: 28073974]
  13. J Adv Nurs. 2019 Dec;75(12):3515-3524 [PMID: 31410867]
  14. Biostatistics. 2008 Jul;9(3):432-41 [PMID: 18079126]
  15. Behav Res Methods. 2018 Feb;50(1):195-212 [PMID: 28342071]
  16. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 02;10(10):e0139691 [PMID: 26431545]
  17. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 19;16(1):129 [PMID: 29914527]
  18. Fertil Steril. 2007 Apr;87(4):792-8 [PMID: 17222834]
  19. Psychol Med. 2016 Dec;46(16):3359-3369 [PMID: 27623748]
  20. World Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;18(2):183-191 [PMID: 31059603]
  21. Hum Reprod. 2011 Sep;26(9):2408-14 [PMID: 21727160]
  22. BMC Res Notes. 2019 May 9;12(1):256 [PMID: 31072342]
  23. Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Feb;46(2):489-501 [PMID: 26732606]
  24. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2014 Sep-Oct;36(5):539-44 [PMID: 25023953]
  25. Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):137-50; discussion 150-93 [PMID: 20584369]
  26. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Dec;32(4):173-81 [PMID: 21995736]
  27. Fertil Steril. 1999 Jul;72(1):54-62 [PMID: 10428148]
  28. Psychiatry Res. 2016 Jun 30;240:53-59 [PMID: 27084991]
  29. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jan;93(1):16.e1-10 [PMID: 18992879]
  30. J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 1;282:98-103 [PMID: 33401129]
  31. BJOG. 2018 Mar;125(4):432-441 [PMID: 29030908]
  32. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2018 Apr;79(4):e12832 [PMID: 29528174]
  33. Fertil Steril. 2010 Mar 1;93(4):1088-96 [PMID: 19118826]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsdistressinfertilitypsychologicalsymptomsanxietydepressionstudystresscentralstrengthnetwork0Psychologicalamongusedrelationshipsaimedidentifypatternscross-sectionalInfertilityPatientsPHQ-9Networkanalysissymptomconcernstress"orderstructurecausesBackground:commonTotalscalescoresoftenrepresentseverityignoresimportantdifferencesspecificexperiencedMethod:JuneSeptember2016740includedaskedcompleteGeneralizedAnxietyDisorder-7HealthQuestionnaire-9FertilityProblemInventoryexaminetestResults:Restlessness"Feelingsguilt"highest"Relationship"sexualstrongestconnectionsStabilityestimationindicatednodecentralitystableclosenessbetweennessCS-coefficients751367respectivelyadditionglobalinvariantacrossgenderLimitations:designpermitidentificationcausalrecruitedonereproductivehospitalespeciallylowsocioeconomicstatuslimitsgeneralizabilityfindingsConclusion:reinforcesneedbetterunderstandunderlyinginfertiledetailedinvestigationrelationshipprovideinformationpsychosocialinterventionsbeyond"alleviating"considerindividualpatternpotentialinsteadassumingconsistentDistressAmongPatients:Analysis

Similar Articles

Cited By (6)