Predicting Periprocedural Complications in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The PROGRESS-CTO Complication Scores.

Bahadir Simsek, Spyridon Kostantinis, Judit Karacsonyi, Khaldoon Alaswad, Oleg Krestyaninov, Dmitrii Khelimskii, Rhian Davies, Jeremy Rier, Omer Goktekin, Sevket Gorgulu, Ahmed ElGuindy, Raj H Chandwaney, Mitul Patel, Nidal Abi Rafeh, Dimitrios Karmpaliotis, Amirali Masoumi, Jaikirshan J Khatri, Farouc A Jaffer, Darshan Doshi, Paul B Poommipanit, Bavana V Rangan, Yader Sanvodal, James W Choi, Basem Elbarouni, William Nicholson, Wissam A Jaber, Stephane Rinfret, Michael Koutouzis, Ioannis Tsiafoutis, Robert W Yeh, M Nicholas Burke, Salman Allana, Olga C Mastrodemos, Emmanouil S Brilakis
Author Information
  1. Bahadir Simsek: Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  2. Spyridon Kostantinis: Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  3. Judit Karacsonyi: Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  4. Khaldoon Alaswad: Division of Cardiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
  5. Oleg Krestyaninov: Meshalkin Siberian Federal Biomedical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
  6. Dmitrii Khelimskii: Meshalkin Siberian Federal Biomedical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation.
  7. Rhian Davies: Division of Cardiology, WellSpan York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania, USA.
  8. Jeremy Rier: Division of Cardiology, WellSpan York Hospital, York, Pennsylvania, USA.
  9. Omer Goktekin: Division of Cardiology, Memorial Bahcelievler Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  10. Sevket Gorgulu: Division of Cardiology, Acibadem Kocaeli Hospital, Izmit, Turkey.
  11. Ahmed ElGuindy: Division of Cardiology, Aswan Heart Center, Aswan, Egypt.
  12. Raj H Chandwaney: Division of Cardiology, Oklahoma Heart Institute, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
  13. Mitul Patel: Division of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
  14. Nidal Abi Rafeh: Division of Cardiology, North Oaks Health System, Hammond, Louisiana, USA.
  15. Dimitrios Karmpaliotis: Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, New Jersey, USA.
  16. Amirali Masoumi: Gagnon Cardiovascular Institute, Morristown Medical Center, New Jersey, USA.
  17. Jaikirshan J Khatri: Division of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  18. Farouc A Jaffer: Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  19. Darshan Doshi: Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  20. Paul B Poommipanit: Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
  21. Bavana V Rangan: Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  22. Yader Sanvodal: Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  23. James W Choi: Cardiology Division, Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  24. Basem Elbarouni: Section of Cardiology, St. Boniface Hospital, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  25. William Nicholson: Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  26. Wissam A Jaber: Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  27. Stephane Rinfret: Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  28. Michael Koutouzis: Second Cardiology Department, Red Cross General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  29. Ioannis Tsiafoutis: Second Cardiology Department, Red Cross General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  30. Robert W Yeh: Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  31. M Nicholas Burke: Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  32. Salman Allana: Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  33. Olga C Mastrodemos: Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
  34. Emmanouil S Brilakis: Center for Coronary Artery Disease, Minneapolis Heart Institute and Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Electronic address: esbrilakis@gmail.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with increased risk of periprocedural complications. Estimating the risk of complications facilitates risk-benefit assessment and procedural planning.
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to develop risk scores for in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), mortality, pericardiocentesis, and acute myocardial infarction (MI) in patients undergoing CTO PCI.
METHODS: The study analyzed the PROGRESS-CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention; NCT02061436) and created risk scores for MACE, mortality, pericardiocentesis, and acute MI. Logistic regression prediction modeling was used to identify independently associated variables, and models were internally validated with bootstrapping.
RESULTS: The incidence of periprocedural complications among 10,480 CTO PCIs was as follows: MACE 215 (2.05%), mortality 47 (0.45%), pericardiocentesis 83 (1.08%), and acute MI 66 (0.63%). The final model for MACE included ≥65 years of age (1 point), moderate-severe calcification (1 point), blunt stump (1 point), antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) (1 point), female (2 points), and retrograde (2 points); the final model for mortality included ≥65 years of age (1 point), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% (1 point), moderate-severe calcification (1 point), ADR (1 point), and retrograde (1 point); the final model for pericardiocentesis included ≥65 years of age (1 point), female (1 point), moderate-severe calcification (1 point), ADR (1 point), and retrograde (2 points); the final model for acute MI included prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery (1 point), atrial fibrillation (1 point), and blunt stump (1 point). The C-statistics of the models were 0.74, 0.80, 0.78, 0.72 for MACE, mortality, pericardiocentesis, and acute MI, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The PROGRESS-CTO complication risk scores can facilitate estimation of the periprocedural complication risk in patients undergoing CTO PCI.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Chronic Disease
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Occlusion
Female
Humans
Myocardial Infarction
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Prospective Studies
Registries
Risk Factors
Stroke Volume
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Function, Left

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.01pointriskMACEmortalitypericardiocentesisacute0MICTO2finalmodelChroniccoronaryPCIperiproceduralcomplicationsscoresPROGRESS-CTOincluded ≥65yearsagemoderate-severecalcificationADRpointsretrogradetotalocclusionpercutaneousinterventionassociatedstudymyocardialinfarctionpatientsundergoingTotalOcclusionpredictionmodelsbluntstumpfemalecomplicationBACKGROUND:increasedEstimatingfacilitatesrisk-benefitassessmentproceduralplanningOBJECTIVES:soughtdevelopin-hospitalmajoradversecardiovasculareventsMETHODS:analyzedProspectiveGlobalRegistryStudyInterventionNCT02061436createdLogisticregressionmodelingusedidentifyindependentlyvariablesinternallyvalidatedbootstrappingRESULTS:incidenceamong10480PCIsfollows:21505%4745%8308%6663%antegradedissectionre-entry1 pointleftventricularejectionfraction ≤45%includedpriorarterybypassgraftsurgeryatrialfibrillationC-statistics74807872respectivelyCONCLUSIONS:canfacilitateestimationPredictingPeriproceduralComplicationsPercutaneousCoronaryIntervention:ComplicationScoreschronic

Similar Articles

Cited By (12)