Representing responses to climate change in spatial land system models.

Žiga Malek, Peter H Verburg
Author Information
  1. Žiga Malek: Institute for Environmental studies Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands. ORCID
  2. Peter H Verburg: Institute for Environmental studies Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.

Abstract

Modelling future change to land use and land cover is done as part of many local and global scenario environmental assessments. Nevertheless, there are still considerable challenges related to simulating land-use responses to climate change. Mostly, climate change is considered by changing the temperature and precipitation, affecting the spatial distribution and productivity of future land use and land cover as result of differential changes in growing conditions. Other climate change effects, such as changes in the water resources needed to support future cropland expansion and intensification, are often neglected. In this study, we demonstrate how including different types of responses to climate change influences the simulation of future changes to land use and land cover, and land management. We study the influence of including different climate change effects in land system modeling step by step. The results show that land system models need to include numerous simultaneous climate change effects, particularly when looking at adaptation options such as implementing irrigation. Otherwise, there is a risk of biased impact estimates leading either to under- or overestimation of the consequences of land use change, including land degradation. Spatial land system models therefore need to be developed accounting for a multitude of climate change impacts, uncertainties related to climate data, and an assessment of the sensitivity of the outcomes toward the decisions of modellers on representing climate change impacts.

Keywords

References

  1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 27;365(1554):2941-57 [PMID: 20713395]
  2. Nature. 2014 Dec 18;516(7531):383-6 [PMID: 25494203]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Mar 17;112(11):3241-6 [PMID: 25733898]
  4. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 20;740:140051 [PMID: 32559540]
  5. Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Dec;19(12):3648-67 [PMID: 23893426]
  6. Glob Chang Biol. 2014 Jun;20(6):1707-22 [PMID: 24399778]
  7. Science. 2005 Jul 22;309(5734):570-4 [PMID: 16040698]
  8. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 2018;23(6):821-837 [PMID: 30093837]
  9. Nat Commun. 2019 May 15;10(1):2166 [PMID: 31092816]
  10. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Oct 15;739:139929 [PMID: 32544686]
  11. PLoS One. 2014 May 29;9(5):e96084 [PMID: 24875496]
  12. Environ Manage. 2020 Sep;66(3):460-475 [PMID: 32627082]
  13. Ambio. 2016 Feb;45(1):15-28 [PMID: 26408313]
  14. Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Mar;21(3):1236-48 [PMID: 25205590]
  15. Environ Manage. 2017 Mar;59(3):440-454 [PMID: 28004140]
  16. Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Dec;23(12):5284-5296 [PMID: 28736872]
  17. Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Dec;22(12):3967-3983 [PMID: 27135635]
  18. Reg Environ Change. 2019;19(5):1401-1416 [PMID: 31178659]
  19. Land Degrad Dev. 2021 Nov;32(17):4954-4973 [PMID: 35874924]
  20. Glob Chang Biol. 2018 May;24(5):2212-2228 [PMID: 29389056]
  21. Nature. 2012 Oct 11;490(7419):254-7 [PMID: 22932270]
  22. Glob Environ Change. 2017 Jan;42:181-192 [PMID: 28239237]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0landchangeclimatefutureusesystemcoverresponsesspatialchangeseffectsincludingmodelsrelatedwaterresourcescroplandintensificationstudydifferentstepneedirrigationimpactsModellingdonepartmanylocalglobalscenarioenvironmentalassessmentsNeverthelessstillconsiderablechallengessimulatingland-useMostlyconsideredchangingtemperatureprecipitationaffectingdistributionproductivityresultdifferentialgrowingconditionsneededsupportexpansionoftenneglecteddemonstratetypesinfluencessimulationmanagementinfluencemodelingresultsshowincludenumeroussimultaneousparticularlylookingadaptationoptionsimplementingOtherwiseriskbiasedimpactestimatesleadingeitherunder-overestimationconsequencesdegradationSpatialthereforedevelopedaccountingmultitudeuncertaintiesdataassessmentsensitivityoutcomestowarddecisionsmodellersrepresentingRepresentingabandonmentallocation

Similar Articles

Cited By