A convergent interaction engine: vocal communication among marmoset monkeys.

J M Burkart, J E C Adriaense, R K Brügger, F M Miss, K Wierucka, C P van Schaik
Author Information
  1. J M Burkart: Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland. ORCID
  2. J E C Adriaense: Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
  3. R K Brügger: Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland. ORCID
  4. F M Miss: Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland. ORCID
  5. K Wierucka: Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
  6. C P van Schaik: Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.

Abstract

To understand the primate origins of the human interaction engine, it is worthwhile to focus not only on great apes but also on callitrichid monkeys (marmosets and tamarins). Like humans, but unlike great apes, callitrichids are cooperative breeders, and thus habitually engage in coordinated joint actions, for instance when an infant is handed over from one group member to another. We first explore the hypothesis that these habitual cooperative interactions, the marmoset interactional ethology, are supported by the same key elements as found in the human interaction engine: mutual gaze (during joint action), turn-taking, volubility, as well as group-wide prosociality and trust. Marmosets show clear evidence of these features. We next examine the prediction that, if such an interaction engine can indeed give rise to more flexible communication, callitrichids may also possess elaborate communicative skills. A review of marmoset vocal communication confirms unusual abilities in these small primates: high volubility and large vocal repertoires, vocal learning and babbling in immatures, and voluntary usage and control. We end by discussing how the adoption of cooperative breeding during human evolution may have catalysed language evolution by adding these convergent consequences to the great ape-like cognitive system of our hominin ancestors. This article is part of the theme issue 'Revisiting the human 'interaction engine': comparative approaches to social action coordination'.

Keywords

References

  1. Anim Cogn. 2001 Nov;4(3-4):247-57 [PMID: 24777515]
  2. Physiol Behav. 2017 May 1;173:79-86 [PMID: 28115225]
  3. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 15;10(6):e0129684 [PMID: 26075710]
  4. Science. 2015 Aug 14;349(6249):734-8 [PMID: 26273055]
  5. Physiol Behav. 2018 Sep 1;193(Pt A):108-116 [PMID: 29730031]
  6. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2020 Sep;11(5):e1529 [PMID: 32342659]
  7. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Sep;120(3):1655-70 [PMID: 17004487]
  8. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0227392 [PMID: 32298305]
  9. Evolution. 2021 Jul;75(7):1727-1737 [PMID: 34019303]
  10. Physiol Behav. 2015 Nov 1;151:246-51 [PMID: 26232089]
  11. Biol Lett. 2017 Jan;13(1): [PMID: 28100720]
  12. Animals (Basel). 2018 Jul 23;8(7): [PMID: 30041425]
  13. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Nov;138(5):2906-28 [PMID: 26627765]
  14. Anim Cogn. 2022 May 5;: [PMID: 35508572]
  15. Am J Primatol. 2013 Nov;75(11):1084-95 [PMID: 23776035]
  16. Am J Primatol. 1984;7(1):15-20 [PMID: 32138463]
  17. iScience. 2021 Aug 11;24(8):102872 [PMID: 34471860]
  18. Anim Cogn. 2021 Nov;24(6):1179-1189 [PMID: 33779867]
  19. Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 09;7:1190 [PMID: 27563294]
  20. Evol Anthropol. 2017 Jan;26(1):25-37 [PMID: 28233388]
  21. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210110 [PMID: 35876201]
  22. Curr Biol. 2017 Jun 19;27(12):1844-1852.e6 [PMID: 28552359]
  23. Am J Primatol. 2001 Jul;54(3):159-69 [PMID: 11443631]
  24. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19762-6 [PMID: 18077409]
  25. Nat Commun. 2017 Jan 16;8:14046 [PMID: 28090084]
  26. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 3;11(1):15683 [PMID: 34344939]
  27. Am J Primatol. 2009 Apr;71(4):333-42 [PMID: 19132731]
  28. Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 13;284(1868): [PMID: 29187625]
  29. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jan 6;375(1789):20190045 [PMID: 31735147]
  30. Am J Primatol. 2016 Mar;78(3):298-314 [PMID: 25573250]
  31. Behav Ecol. 2011 Jul;22(4):745-754 [PMID: 22479136]
  32. Proc Biol Sci. 2015 May 22;282(1807):20150069 [PMID: 25904663]
  33. Curr Biol. 2018 Mar 5;28(5):788-794.e3 [PMID: 29478857]
  34. Neurol Res. 2018 Apr;40(4):303-311 [PMID: 29457539]
  35. Anim Cogn. 2020 May;23(3):581-594 [PMID: 32107657]
  36. Am J Primatol. 1993;31(1):67-75 [PMID: 32070085]
  37. Curr Biol. 2013 Nov 4;23(21):2162-8 [PMID: 24139740]
  38. Anim Behav. 2000 Aug;60(2):195-202 [PMID: 10973721]
  39. J Comp Psychol. 2001 Sep;115(3):258-71 [PMID: 11594495]
  40. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 10;115(15):3978-3983 [PMID: 29581269]
  41. Am J Primatol. 1990;21(4):257-264 [PMID: 31963969]
  42. J Acoust Soc Am. 1968 Dec;44(6):1574-84 [PMID: 5702032]
  43. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Aug;92(3):1427-1433 [PMID: 27480784]
  44. Anim Cogn. 2010 Jan;13(1):1-19 [PMID: 19629551]
  45. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):825 [PMID: 33436898]
  46. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Oct 25;376(1836):20200239 [PMID: 34482727]
  47. Curr Biol. 2020 Nov 2;30(21):4276-4283.e3 [PMID: 32888481]
  48. Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 31;11:1835 [PMID: 32982822]
  49. R Soc Open Sci. 2016 Aug 24;3(8):160278 [PMID: 27853603]
  50. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 14;118(37): [PMID: 34504001]
  51. J Comp Psychol. 2006 May;120(2):120-30 [PMID: 16719590]
  52. Nat Commun. 2014 Aug 27;5:4747 [PMID: 25158760]
  53. J Cogn Neurosci. 2019 Sep;31(9):1318-1328 [PMID: 30513042]
  54. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 May 5;371(1693): [PMID: 27069047]
  55. Eur J Neurosci. 2020 Sep;52(6):3531-3544 [PMID: 32170972]
  56. Science. 2015 Aug 14;349(6249):688-9 [PMID: 26273040]
  57. PLoS One. 2019 Oct 23;14(10):e0222486 [PMID: 31644527]
  58. Am J Primatol. 2003 Jan;59(1):21-8 [PMID: 12526036]
  59. Am J Primatol. 1993;30(1):37-54 [PMID: 31941179]
  60. Dev Psychobiol. 2021 Jul;63(5):1583-1588 [PMID: 33826142]
  61. Psychol Sci. 2018 Jun;29(6):984-995 [PMID: 29702031]
  62. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Oct;18(10):543-53 [PMID: 25048821]
  63. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018 Jun;21:27-32 [PMID: 29868626]
  64. Dev Neurobiol. 2017 Mar;77(3):286-299 [PMID: 27739195]
  65. J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jul;114(1):274-83 [PMID: 25925323]
  66. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Jul 20;375(1803):20190499 [PMID: 32475330]
  67. J Comp Psychol. 2019 Nov;133(4):474-487 [PMID: 30985161]
  68. Sci Adv. 2018 Apr 11;4(4):eaar4012 [PMID: 29651461]
  69. Nat Commun. 2016 Dec 20;7:13915 [PMID: 27996969]
  70. Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Oct;28(5):675-91; discussion 691-735 [PMID: 16262930]
  71. Behav Processes. 2014 Nov;109 Pt A:27-33 [PMID: 25010563]
  72. Animals (Basel). 2018 Jun 21;8(7): [PMID: 29933611]
  73. Sci Adv. 2021 Jun 30;7(27): [PMID: 34193413]
  74. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2006 Jan;192(1):27-38 [PMID: 16133500]
  75. J Comp Psychol. 2022 Apr 07;: [PMID: 35389713]
  76. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2000 Aug;24(6):581-604 [PMID: 10940436]
  77. Biol Lett. 2018 Mar;14(3): [PMID: 29593076]
  78. Int J Primatol. 2018;39(6):1105-1123 [PMID: 30613117]
  79. Anim Cogn. 2016 May;19(3):483-500 [PMID: 26833496]
  80. PLoS One. 2007 Jul 11;2(7):e611 [PMID: 17622356]
  81. Science. 2017 Mar 17;355(6330):1120-1122 [PMID: 28302806]
  82. J Exp Biol. 2011 Nov 1;214(Pt 21):3619-29 [PMID: 21993791]
  83. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 May;93(2):996-1013 [PMID: 29111610]
  84. J Comp Psychol. 2017 May;131(2):174-178 [PMID: 28277719]
  85. Horm Behav. 2005 Jan;47(1):1-7 [PMID: 15579259]
  86. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Sep 19;369(1651):20130302 [PMID: 25092670]
  87. Am J Primatol. 2009 Jun;71(6):503-9 [PMID: 19319974]
  88. Am J Primatol. 2009 Apr;71(4):324-32 [PMID: 19090554]
  89. Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e195 [PMID: 27464851]
  90. Elife. 2020 Oct 20;9: [PMID: 33079060]
  91. Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 06;5:8878 [PMID: 25743581]
  92. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2723-35 [PMID: 20679115]
  93. Sci Adv. 2021 Feb 3;7(6): [PMID: 33536207]
  94. Zoo Biol. 2013 Nov-Dec;32(6):626-31 [PMID: 24038444]

MeSH Term

Animal Communication
Animals
Callithrix
Communication
Cooperative Behavior
Humans
Language
Vocalization, Animal

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0humaninteractioncooperativevocalgreatmarmosetcommunicationengineapesalsomonkeyscallitrichidsjointengine:mutualgazeactionturn-takingvolubilitymaybabblingcontrolbreedingevolutionconvergentunderstandprimateoriginsworthwhilefocuscallitrichidmarmosetstamarinsLikehumansunlikebreedersthushabituallyengagecoordinatedactionsinstanceinfanthandedonegroupmemberanotherfirstexplorehypothesishabitualinteractionsinteractionalethologysupportedkeyelementsfoundwellgroup-wideprosocialitytrustMarmosetsshowclearevidencefeaturesnextexaminepredictioncanindeedgiveriseflexiblepossesselaboratecommunicativeskillsreviewconfirmsunusualabilitiessmallprimates:highlargerepertoireslearningimmaturesvoluntaryusageenddiscussingadoptioncatalysedlanguageaddingconsequencesape-likecognitivesystemhomininancestorsarticlepartthemeissue'Revisiting'interactionengine':comparativeapproachessocialcoordination'amongconvergenceintentionalvocalizations

Similar Articles

Cited By