Patient-Reported Barriers and Enablers to Deprescribing Recommendations During a Clinical Trial (Shed-MEDS).

Jennifer L Kim, Kanah M Lewallen, Emily K Hollingsworth, Avantika S Shah, Sandra F Simmons, Eduard E Vasilevskis
Author Information
  1. Jennifer L Kim: Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. ORCID
  2. Kanah M Lewallen: Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  3. Emily K Hollingsworth: Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. ORCID
  4. Avantika S Shah: Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. ORCID
  5. Sandra F Simmons: Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  6. Eduard E Vasilevskis: Geriatric Research, Education, & Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Tennessee Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Effective deprescribing requires shared decision making between a patient and their clinician, and should be used when implementing evidence-based deprescribing conversations. As part of the Shed-MEDS clinical trial, this study assessed barriers and enablers that influence patient decision making in deprescribing to inform future implementation efforts and adaptations.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Shed-MEDS, a randomized controlled deprescribing trial, included hospitalized older adults discharging to post-acute care facilities. A trained clinician reviewed each participant's medical history and medication list to identify medications with potential for deprescribing. The study clinician then conducted a semistructured patient-centered deprescribing interview to determine patient (or surrogate) concerns about medications and willingness to deprescribe. Reeve et al.'s (2013) framework was used to categorize barriers and enablers to deprescribing from the patient's perspective, including "appropriateness of cessation," "fear," "dislike of a medication," "influences," and "process of cessation."
RESULTS: Overall, Participants/surrogates (N = 177) agreed with 63% (883 total medications) of the study clinician's deprescribing recommendations. Thematic analysis revealed that "appropriateness" of a medication was the most common barrier (88.2%) and enabler (67.3%) to deprescribing. Other deprescribing enablers were in the following domains: "influences" (22.7%), "process" (22.5%), "pragmatic" (19.4%), and "dislike" (5.3%).
DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Use of a semistructured deprescribing interview conversation tool allowed study clinicians to elicit individual barriers and enablers to deprescribing from the patient's perspective. Participants in this study expressed more agreement than disagreement with study clinicians' deprescribing recommendations. These results should inform future implementation efforts that incorporate a patient-centered framework during deprescribing conversations.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02979353.

Keywords

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT02979353

References

  1. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Dec;36(12):3830-3840 [PMID: 34173200]
  2. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Apr;70(4):1180-1189 [PMID: 34967444]
  3. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr;176(4):473-82 [PMID: 26998708]
  4. Med J Aust. 2019 Mar;210(4):174-179 [PMID: 30771226]
  5. Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):e13-e115 [PMID: 29133356]
  6. Am J Med. 2012 Jun;125(6):529-37.e4 [PMID: 22385783]
  7. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):746-753 [PMID: 32067226]
  8. Drugs Aging. 2013 Oct;30(10):793-807 [PMID: 23912674]
  9. Maturitas. 2016 Sep;91:115-34 [PMID: 27451330]
  10. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Oct;67(10):2018-2022 [PMID: 31430394]
  11. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1673-1680 [PMID: 30326004]
  12. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Nov;63(11):2227-46 [PMID: 26446832]
  13. Med Care. 2017 Mar;55(3):306-313 [PMID: 27579916]
  14. Drugs Aging. 2020 Dec;37(12):909-916 [PMID: 33026638]
  15. Pharmacy (Basel). 2018 Apr 16;6(2): [PMID: 29659488]
  16. BMJ. 2016 Jun 03;353:i2893 [PMID: 27260319]
  17. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2018 Oct 20;9(12):687-698 [PMID: 30546863]
  18. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 04;11(3):e0149984 [PMID: 26942907]
  19. Drugs Aging. 2016 Dec;33(12):913-928 [PMID: 27785734]
  20. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012 May;28(2):237-53 [PMID: 22500541]
  21. J Hosp Med. 2016 Oct;11(10):694-700 [PMID: 27255830]
  22. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 May;60(5):896-904 [PMID: 22568483]
  23. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Sep;13(7):611-7 [PMID: 22796362]
  24. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83 [PMID: 3558716]
  25. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Jan;67(1):172-180 [PMID: 30315745]
  26. Clin Geriatr Med. 2018 Feb;34(1):39-54 [PMID: 29129216]
  27. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 14;19(1):165 [PMID: 30871561]
  28. J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Mar;41(3):788-797 [PMID: 35164584]
  29. Patient Educ Couns. 1999 Jun;37(2):113-24 [PMID: 14528539]
  30. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Nov;56(11):2069-75 [PMID: 19016941]
  31. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 May;175(5):827-34 [PMID: 25798731]
  32. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Oct 11;170(18):1648-54 [PMID: 20937924]
  33. Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S152-S162 [PMID: 31862755]
  34. Age Ageing. 2009 Sep;38(5):603-6 [PMID: 19435757]
  35. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Sep 20;73(7):e98-e107 [PMID: 29190369]
  36. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2018 Jan - Feb;58(1):117-119 [PMID: 29217143]
  37. Age Ageing. 2008 Nov;37(6):673-9 [PMID: 18829684]
  38. Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Sep 03;7(3): [PMID: 31484305]

Grants

  1. I01 HX002441/HSRD VA
  2. R01 AG053264/NIA NIH HHS
  3. UL1 TR000445/NCATS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Aged
Deprescriptions
Patient Discharge
Decision Making, Shared
Dissent and Disputes
Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0deprescribingstudyenablers"ANDdecisionmakingpatientclinicianShed-MEDSbarriersmedicationmedicationsusedconversationstrialinformfutureimplementationeffortssemistructuredpatient-centeredinterviewframeworkpatient'sperspectivecessationrecommendations3%22BACKGROUNDOBJECTIVES:Effectiverequiressharedimplementingevidence-basedpartclinicalassessedinfluenceadaptationsRESEARCHDESIGNMETHODS:randomizedcontrolledincludedhospitalizedolderadultsdischargingpost-acutecarefacilitiestrainedreviewedparticipant'smedicalhistorylistidentifypotentialconducteddeterminesurrogateconcernswillingnessdeprescribeReeveetal's2013categorizeincluding"appropriateness"fear"dislike"influences"process"RESULTS:Overallparticipants/surrogatesN=177agreed63%883totalclinician'sThematicanalysisrevealed"appropriateness"commonbarrier882%enabler67followingdomains:"influences"7%"process"5%"pragmatic"194%"dislike"5DISCUSSIONIMPLICATIONS:UseconversationtoolallowedclinicianselicitindividualParticipantsexpressedagreementdisagreementclinicians'resultsincorporateCLINICALTRIALSREGISTRATIONNUMBER:NCT02979353Patient-ReportedBarriersEnablersDeprescribingRecommendationsClinicalTrialPatient-centeredPolypharmacyShared

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)