A Survey of Mobile Apps for the Care Management of Patients with Dementia.

Hsiao-Lun Kuo, Chun-Hung Chang, Wei-Fen Ma
Author Information
  1. Hsiao-Lun Kuo: An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan.
  2. Chun-Hung Chang: An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan. ORCID
  3. Wei-Fen Ma: Department of Nursing, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: dementia is a progressive neurocognitive disorder that currently affects approximately 50 million people globally and causes a heavy burden for their families and societies. This study analyzed mobile apps for dementia care in different languages and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Con-trolled Clinical Trials, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, Google Play Store, Apple App Store, and Huawei App Store for mobile applications for dementia care. The Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) was used to assess the quality of applications.
RESULTS: We included 99 apps for dementia care. No significant difference in MARS scores was noted between the two language apps (Overall MARS: English: 3.576 ± 0.580, Chinese: 3.569 ± 0.746, = 0.962). In the subscale analysis, English apps had higher scores of perceived impact than Chinese apps but these were not significant (2.654 ± 1.372 vs. 2.000 ± 1.057, = 0.061). (2) Applications during the COVID-19 pandemic had higher MARS scores than those before the COVID-19 pandemic but these were not significant (during the COVID-19 pandemic: 3.722 ± 0.416; before: 3.699 ± 0.615, = 0.299). In the sub-scale analysis, apps during the COVID-19 pandemic had higher scores of engagement than apps before the COVID-19 pandemic but these were not significant (3.117 ± 0.594 vs. 2.698 ± 0.716, = 0.068).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that there is a minor but nonsignificant difference between different languages and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further cooperation among dementia professionals, technology experts, and caregivers is warranted to provide evidence-based and user-friendly information to meet the needs of users.

Keywords

References

  1. Alzheimers Dement. 2010 Mar;6(2):98-103 [PMID: 20298969]
  2. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Aug;7(8):e50 [PMID: 32711713]
  3. PM R. 2017 May;9(5S):S106-S115 [PMID: 28527495]
  4. Dementia (London). 2019 Oct-Nov;18(7-8):3091-3112 [PMID: 29631492]
  5. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 22;17(15): [PMID: 32708016]
  6. Lancet. 2016 Jul 30;388(10043):505-17 [PMID: 26921134]
  7. NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Sep 7;4(1):131 [PMID: 34493819]
  8. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 9;11(1):16144 [PMID: 34373540]
  9. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Nov 9;9(11):e21659 [PMID: 33164898]
  10. Neurology. 2013 May 7;80(19):1778-83 [PMID: 23390181]
  11. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2022;24(1):1-15 [PMID: 35221646]
  12. J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Jun;39(6):601-608 [PMID: 30049239]
  13. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 May;8(5):416-427 [PMID: 33836148]
  14. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jun 12;28(6):1308-1317 [PMID: 33682009]
  15. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 May;22(5):481-8 [PMID: 23567432]
  16. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Jan 12;14:45-57 [PMID: 33469298]
  17. Comput Inform Nurs. 2021 Mar 3;39(7):347-354 [PMID: 33660628]
  18. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jan 28;362(4):329-44 [PMID: 20107219]
  19. BMC Geriatr. 2021 Apr 7;21(1):230 [PMID: 33827446]
  20. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Mar 29;10(3):e33863 [PMID: 35348467]
  21. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2022 May 02;8(1):e12236 [PMID: 35509503]
  22. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jul 28;68:102634 [PMID: 34386226]
  23. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 20;21(3): [PMID: 33498590]
  24. Alzheimers Dement. 2022 Apr;18(4):700-789 [PMID: 35289055]
  25. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 15;19(4): [PMID: 35206373]
  26. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34 [PMID: 19631507]
  27. J Appl Gerontol. 2019 Jan;38(1):73-91 [PMID: 28774215]
  28. J Alzheimers Dis. 2008 Oct;15(2):285-7 [PMID: 18953114]
  29. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 27;24(4):e30503 [PMID: 35475733]
  30. Health Care Manag Sci. 2020 Jun;23(2):287-309 [PMID: 31218511]
  31. J Holist Nurs. 2021 Dec 10;:8980101211064605 [PMID: 34889146]
  32. Technol Health Care. 2019;27(4):417-430 [PMID: 30909255]
  33. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jun 10;4(2):e72 [PMID: 27287964]
  34. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2013 Jul;15(7):367 [PMID: 23712718]
  35. Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906 [PMID: 33789826]
  36. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 11;3(1):e27 [PMID: 25760773]
  37. Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920 [PMID: 32112714]
  38. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Nov 25;7(11):e15940 [PMID: 31763991]
  39. JMIR Aging. 2020 Jan 24;3(1):e15290 [PMID: 32012045]
  40. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jan 30;10(2): [PMID: 35206890]
  41. Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;10:797176 [PMID: 35425752]
  42. J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;86(4):1527-1543 [PMID: 35253744]
  43. N Engl J Med. 2015 Sep 24;373(13):1276-7 [PMID: 26398084]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00apps±COVID-19pandemic3dementiasignificantscores=2careStoreMARShigherDementiamobiledifferentlanguagesCochraneAppapplicationsMobiledifferenceanalysis1vscaregiversOBJECTIVE:progressiveneurocognitivedisordercurrentlyaffectsapproximately50millionpeoplegloballycausesheavyburdenfamiliessocietiesstudyanalyzedMETHODS:searchedPubMedCollaborationCentralRegisterCon-trolledClinicalTrialsSystematicReviewsGooglePlayAppleHuaweiApplicationRatingScaleusedassessqualityRESULTS:included99notedtwolanguageOverallMARS:English:576580Chinese:569746962subscaleEnglishperceivedimpactChinese654372000057061Applicationspandemic:722416before:699615299sub-scaleengagement117594698716068CONCLUSIONS:resultsrevealedminornonsignificantcooperationamongprofessionalstechnologyexpertswarrantedprovideevidence-baseduser-friendlyinformationmeetneedsusersSurveyAppsCareManagementPatientscognitiveimpairment

Similar Articles

Cited By (7)