Thrombophilia Impact on Treatment Decisions, Subsequent Venous or Arterial Thrombosis and Pregnancy-Related Morbidity: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.

Kristina Vrotniakaite-Bajerciene, Tobias Tritschler, Katarzyna Aleksandra Jalowiec, Helen Broughton, Justine Brodard, Naomi Azur Porret, Alan Haynes, Alicia Rovo, Johanna Anna Kremer Hovinga, Drahomir Aujesky, Anne Angelillo-Scherrer
Author Information
  1. Kristina Vrotniakaite-Bajerciene: Department of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland. ORCID
  2. Tobias Tritschler: Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland. ORCID
  3. Katarzyna Aleksandra Jalowiec: Department of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
  4. Helen Broughton: Department of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
  5. Justine Brodard: Department of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland. ORCID
  6. Naomi Azur Porret: Department of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
  7. Alan Haynes: Clinical Trials Unit Bern, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland. ORCID
  8. Alicia Rovo: Department of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland. ORCID
  9. Johanna Anna Kremer Hovinga: Department of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland. ORCID
  10. Drahomir Aujesky: Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
  11. Anne Angelillo-Scherrer: Department of Hematology and Central Hematology Laboratory, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland. ORCID

Abstract

(1) Background: Thrombophilia testing utility has remained controversial since its clinical introduction, because data on its influence on treatment decisions are limited. (2) Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 3550 unselected patients referred for thrombophilia consultation at the Bern University Hospital in Switzerland from January 2010 to October 2020. We studied the influence of thrombophilia testing results on treatment decisions and evaluated the association between thrombophilia and thromboembolic and pregnancy-related morbidity events after testing up to 03/2021. (3) Results: In 1192/3550 patients (34%), at least one case of thrombophilia was found and 366 (10%) had high-risk thrombophilia. A total of 211/3550 (6%) work-ups (111/826 (13%) with low-risk thrombophilia and 100/366 (27%) with high-risk thrombophilia) led to an appropriate decision to extend or initiate anticoagulation, and 189 (5%) negative results led to the withholding of anticoagulation therapy inappropriately. A total of 2492 patients (69%) were followed up for >30 days, with a median follow-up of 49 months (range, 1−183 months). Patients with high-risk thrombophilia had a higher risk of subsequent venous thromboembolic events and pregnancy-related morbidity compared to those without thrombophilia. (4) Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the limited usefulness of thrombophilia work-up in clinical decision-making. High-risk thrombophilia was associated with subsequent venous thromboembolism and pregnancy-related morbidity.

Keywords

References

  1. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2016 Nov;42(8):808-820 [PMID: 27764878]
  2. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:101029 [PMID: 26600801]
  3. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Nov;29(11):105209 [PMID: 33066926]
  4. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 4;151(3):180-90 [PMID: 19581633]
  5. J Thromb Haemost. 2016 Jul;14(7):1480-3 [PMID: 27428935]
  6. Thromb Res. 2015 Dec;136(6):1160-4 [PMID: 26477821]
  7. J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Mar;18(3):534-542 [PMID: 31821707]
  8. Am Fam Physician. 2012 Nov 15;86(10):913-9 [PMID: 23157144]
  9. Blood Adv. 2018 Nov 27;2(22):3198-3225 [PMID: 30482763]
  10. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2016 Dec 2;2016(1):1-9 [PMID: 27913455]
  11. J Thromb Haemost. 2016 May;14(5):982-6 [PMID: 26857657]
  12. PLoS One. 2016 May 13;11(5):e0155326 [PMID: 27176603]
  13. Nurs Open. 2022 May;9(3):1873-1882 [PMID: 33991462]
  14. CMAJ. 2018 Feb 12;190(6):E172 [PMID: 29440340]
  15. J Thromb Haemost. 2006 Feb;4(2):295-306 [PMID: 16420554]
  16. Sociol Health Illn. 2021 Aug;43(7):1627-1642 [PMID: 34293180]
  17. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2018 Mar;78(3):274-282 [PMID: 29576632]
  18. N Engl J Med. 2017 Sep 21;377(12):1177-1187 [PMID: 28930509]
  19. J Thromb Haemost. 2008 Sep;6(9):1474-7 [PMID: 18540999]
  20. Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e195S-e226S [PMID: 22315261]
  21. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018 Apr;12:29-34 [PMID: 29674195]
  22. Hum Reprod. 2021 Apr 20;36(5):1213-1229 [PMID: 33575779]
  23. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016 Jan;41(1):154-64 [PMID: 26780744]
  24. Thromb J. 2006 Sep 12;4:15 [PMID: 16968541]
  25. Thromb Res. 2017 Jan;149:76-80 [PMID: 27931012]
  26. Am Fam Physician. 2019 Mar 15;99(6):362-369 [PMID: 30874413]
  27. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 15;271:323 [PMID: 30017526]
  28. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 May;49(4):618-629 [PMID: 32248336]
  29. JAMA. 2005 May 18;293(19):2352-61 [PMID: 15900005]
  30. Clin Radiol. 2020 Apr;75(4):254-264 [PMID: 31980184]
  31. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Apr;42(2):271-283 [PMID: 33694139]
  32. Thromb Haemost. 2013 Oct;110(4):697-705 [PMID: 23846575]
  33. Lancet. 2003 Aug 16;362(9383):523-6 [PMID: 12932383]
  34. Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jan;109(1):79-84 [PMID: 23178976]
  35. J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Sep;18(9):2274-2286 [PMID: 32484606]
  36. J Thromb Haemost. 2012 Oct;10(10):2068-74 [PMID: 22882779]
  37. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Jan;49(1):108-112 [PMID: 31388853]
  38. BMJ. 2020 May 19;369:m1565 [PMID: 32430311]
  39. J Perinat Med. 2015 Mar;43(2):269-72 [PMID: 24945420]
  40. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 25;376(21):2053-2064 [PMID: 28538121]
  41. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Apr;28(4):882-889 [PMID: 30595511]
  42. Thromb Res. 2009;123 Suppl 3:S16-21 [PMID: 19203641]
  43. TH Open. 2020 Aug 09;4(3):e153-e162 [PMID: 32803121]
  44. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2014 Mar;41(1):133-44 [PMID: 24491988]
  45. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2019 Jul;30(5):249-252 [PMID: 31145103]
  46. Insights Imaging. 2020 Oct 15;11(1):112 [PMID: 33057847]
  47. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;132(4):1069 [PMID: 30247353]
  48. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2018 Sep 12;3(4):231-236 [PMID: 30637129]
  49. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Sep 20;152(38):2093-4 [PMID: 18837187]
  50. J Pers Med. 2019 Jan 15;9(1): [PMID: 30650548]
  51. Semin Perinatol. 2015 Jun;39(4):268-75 [PMID: 26159741]
  52. J Thromb Haemost. 2005 Mar;3(3):459-64 [PMID: 15748234]
  53. Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Apr;93(4):523-538 [PMID: 29622098]
  54. Stroke. 2020 Mar;51(3):729-735 [PMID: 32078487]
  55. Blood Adv. 2020 Dec 8;4(23):5958-5965 [PMID: 33275768]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0thrombophiliapregnancy-relatedmorbiditytestingclinicalpatientshigh-riskvenousThrombophiliainfluencetreatmentdecisionslimitedstudyresultsthromboemboliceventstotalledanticoagulationmonthssubsequentdecision-makingthrombosis1Background:utilityremainedcontroversialsinceintroductiondata2Methods:conductedsingle-centerretrospectivecohort3550unselectedreferredconsultationBernUniversityHospitalSwitzerlandJanuary2010October2020studiedevaluatedassociation03/20213Results:1192/355034%leastonecasefound36610%211/35506%work-ups111/82613%low-risk100/36627%appropriatedecisionextendinitiate1895%negativewithholdingtherapyinappropriately249269%followed>30daysmedianfollow-up49range1−183Patientshigherriskcomparedwithout4Conclusions:demonstratedusefulnesswork-upHigh-riskassociatedthromboembolismImpactTreatmentDecisionsSubsequentVenousArterialThrombosisPregnancy-RelatedMorbidity:RetrospectiveSingle-CenterCohortStudyarterial

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.