Extended producer responsibility in developing economies: Assessment of promoting factors through retail electronic firms for sustainable e-waste management.

Daniel Faibil, Richard Asante, Martin Agyemang, Michael Addaney, Charles Baah
Author Information
  1. Daniel Faibil: School of Economics and Management, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, PR China. ORCID
  2. Richard Asante: Department of Civil Engineering, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou, PR China. ORCID
  3. Martin Agyemang: Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. ORCID
  4. Michael Addaney: Department of Planning and Sustainability, School of Geosciences, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Sunyani, Ghana. ORCID
  5. Charles Baah: Transportation Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China.

Abstract

The adoption of the extended producers' responsibility (EPR) principle as a mitigation strategy for e-waste management has gained impetus over the past few years. However, e-waste management in developing economies through retail electronic firms' or producer responsibility organization is still inceptive. This study identified and analysed promoting factors of EPR principle adoption through retail electronic firms in the Ghanaian electronic industry. Through extant literature and stakeholders' perspectives, 15 factors were identified as strategic and operational promoting factors, which were evaluated by experts. Subsequently, the grey Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory technique was used to analyse the data obtained. The outcome of the study suggests that operational factors have more influence than strategic factors to determine the adoption of the EPR principle. In addition, most of the important operational factors tend to be enabled by both push and pull measures by supply chain stakeholders. In the short term, adopting an advanced deposit recycling refund scheme tends to be the most effective elementary operational factor, which can push retailers to adopt the EPR principle. The significant pull elementary factors that need short-term attention include the opening up and creation of new market opportunities for e-companies as well as resilient and effective resources management. The study findings suggest that Ghana's present policy framework is limited for the adoption of the EPR principle by retail electronic firms. The study contributes to identifying promoting factors for adoption of the EPR principle from the perspectives of both the external and internal stakeholders in the electronic industry with emphasis on push and pull strategy.

Keywords

References

  1. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Jun;23(11):10883-10894 [PMID: 26897583]
  2. Waste Manag Res. 2011 Sep;29(9):945-53 [PMID: 21771873]
  3. Sci Total Environ. 2014 Jan 1;466-467:369-76 [PMID: 23921367]
  4. Sci Total Environ. 2010 Dec 1;409(1):19-32 [PMID: 20951410]
  5. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Dec;26(35):35305-35316 [PMID: 31016585]
  6. J Environ Manage. 2018 Apr 15;212:108-114 [PMID: 29428645]
  7. J Environ Manage. 2013 Oct 15;128:941-8 [PMID: 23892135]
  8. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 25;723:138073 [PMID: 32229383]
  9. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Dec;27(35):44561-44584 [PMID: 32772292]
  10. Sci Total Environ. 2006 Apr 15;359(1-3):38-56 [PMID: 16169574]
  11. Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2008 Aug;29(8):2105-10 [PMID: 18839557]
  12. Waste Manag Res. 2017 Jan;35(1):3-28 [PMID: 27628285]
  13. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jun 15;773:145623 [PMID: 33592459]
  14. Geohealth. 2020 Aug 01;4(8):e2020GH000247 [PMID: 32832821]
  15. Waste Manag Res. 2015 Jul;33(7):595-611 [PMID: 26185163]
  16. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 15;726:138531 [PMID: 32305760]
  17. Sci Total Environ. 2012 May 1;424:63-73 [PMID: 22446112]
  18. J Environ Manage. 2019 Aug 15;244:344-361 [PMID: 31129466]
  19. Waste Manag. 2016 Nov;57:46-56 [PMID: 26852754]
  20. Chem Asian J. 2016 Jun 21;11(12):1837-41 [PMID: 27124731]
  21. Int J Environ Health Res. 2012;22(6):500-17 [PMID: 22428915]
  22. Waste Manag Res. 2011 Sep;29(9):911-8 [PMID: 21771871]
  23. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag. 2021;23(1):77-83 [PMID: 35194397]
  24. Waste Manag Res. 2012 Nov;30(11):1138-44 [PMID: 21945991]
  25. Waste Manag. 2020 Jun 1;110:20-23 [PMID: 32445914]
  26. Environ Pollut. 2016 Nov;218:1334-1341 [PMID: 27613322]
  27. J Environ Manage. 2020 May 1;261:110234 [PMID: 32148304]
  28. Waste Manag Res. 2015 Jun;33(6):533-42 [PMID: 25990983]
  29. Waste Manag Res. 2018 May;36(5):408-414 [PMID: 29732961]
  30. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(12):13325-13338 [PMID: 32020449]
  31. Chemosphere. 2016 Dec;164:68-74 [PMID: 27580259]
  32. Waste Manag. 2020 Feb 15;103:187-197 [PMID: 31887691]
  33. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 27;17(9): [PMID: 32349371]
  34. Heliyon. 2020 Aug 08;6(8):e04548 [PMID: 32802976]
  35. Waste Manag Res. 2011 Sep;29(9):889-90 [PMID: 21900358]
  36. Sci Total Environ. 2017 Dec 1;601-602:1566-1574 [PMID: 28609845]
  37. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 23;9(12):e031741 [PMID: 31874875]

MeSH Term

Electronic Waste
Ghana
Waste Management
Recycling
Electronics

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0factorselectronicEPRprincipleadoptionmanagementretailresponsibilitye-wastestudypromotingfirmsoperationalproducerpushpullstakeholdersstrategydevelopingidentifiedindustryperspectivesstrategiceffectiveelementaryExtendedextendedproducers'mitigationgainedimpetuspastyearsHowevereconomiesfirms'organizationstillinceptiveanalysedGhanaianextantliteraturestakeholders'15evaluatedexpertsSubsequentlygreyDecision-MakingTrialEvaluationLaboratorytechniqueusedanalysedataobtainedoutcomesuggestsinfluencedetermineadditionimportanttendenabledmeasuressupplychainshorttermadoptingadvanceddepositrecyclingrefundschemetendsfactorcanretailersadoptsignificantneedshort-termattentionincludeopeningcreationnewmarketopportunitiese-companieswellresilientresourcesfindingssuggestGhana'spresentpolicyframeworklimitedcontributesidentifyingexternalinternalemphasiseconomies:AssessmentsustainableDelphimethodgrey-DEMATELperspective

Similar Articles

Cited By