NICU Admission for Term Neonates in a Large Single-Center Population: A Comprehensive Assessment of Risk Factors Using a Tandem Analysis Approach.

Shahar Talisman, Joshua Guedalia, Rivka Farkash, Tehila Avitan, Naama Srebnik, Yair Kasirer, Michael S Schimmel, Dunia Ghanem, Ron Unger, Sorina Grisaru Granovsky
Author Information
  1. Shahar Talisman: Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel. ORCID
  2. Joshua Guedalia: The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel. ORCID
  3. Rivka Farkash: Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel.
  4. Tehila Avitan: Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel.
  5. Naama Srebnik: Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel.
  6. Yair Kasirer: Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel. ORCID
  7. Michael S Schimmel: Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel.
  8. Dunia Ghanem: Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel.
  9. Ron Unger: The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 5290002, Israel.
  10. Sorina Grisaru Granovsky: Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9103102, Israel.

Abstract

Objective: Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission among term neonates is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, as well as high healthcare costs. A comprehensive NICU admission risk assessment using an integrated statistical approach for this rare admission event may be used to build a risk calculation algorithm for this group of neonates prior to delivery. Methods: A single-center case−control retrospective study was conducted between August 2005 and December 2019, including in-hospital singleton live born neonates, born at ≥37 weeks’ gestation. Analyses included univariate and multivariable models combined with the machine learning gradient-boosting model (GBM). The primary aim of the study was to identify and quantify risk factors and causes of NICU admission of term neonates. Results: During the study period, 206,509 births were registered at the Shaare Zedek Medical Center. After applying the study exclusion criteria, 192,527 term neonates were included in the study; 5292 (2.75%) were admitted to the NICU. The NICU admission risk was significantly higher (ORs [95%CIs]) for offspring of nulliparous women (1.19 [1.07, 1.33]), those with diabetes mellitus or hypertensive complications of pregnancy (2.52 [2.09, 3.03] and 1.28 [1.02, 1.60] respectively), and for those born during the 37th week of gestation (2.99 [2.63, 3.41]; p < 0.001 for all), adjusted for congenital malformations and genetic syndromes. A GBM to predict NICU admission applied to data prior to delivery showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.750 (95%CI 0.743−0.757) and classified 27% as high risk and 73% as low risk. This risk stratification was significantly associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Conclusion: The present study identified NICU admission risk factors for term neonates; along with the machine learning ranking of the risk factors, the highly predictive model may serve as a basis for individual risk calculation algorithm prior to delivery. We suggest that in the future, this type of planning of the delivery will serve different health systems, in both high- and low-resource environments, along with the NICU admission or transfer policy.

Keywords

References

  1. Hosp Pediatr. 2016 May;6(5):255-60 [PMID: 27117951]
  2. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2014 Jul-Aug;43(4):409-21 [PMID: 24980074]
  3. Ann Saudi Med. 2017 Nov-Dec;37(6):420-424 [PMID: 29229889]
  4. Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Aug;60(2):137-47 [PMID: 7155472]
  5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 11;17(1):415 [PMID: 29228911]
  6. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):1139-1140 [PMID: 24150030]
  7. Birth. 2007 Dec;34(4):301-7 [PMID: 18021145]
  8. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;220(4):395.e1-395.e12 [PMID: 30786256]
  9. BMJ. 2010 Nov 02;341:c5639 [PMID: 21045050]
  10. Hosp Pediatr. 2018 Nov;8(11):686-692 [PMID: 30361206]
  11. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Mar-Apr;21(2):326-36 [PMID: 24043317]
  12. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):738 [PMID: 31640679]
  13. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Feb;303(2):409-417 [PMID: 32870345]
  14. J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Jun;64:277-282 [PMID: 30878282]
  15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):437.e1-437.e15 [PMID: 32434000]
  16. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Sep;33(17):3003-3009 [PMID: 30624998]
  17. Nat Mach Intell. 2020 Jan;2(1):56-67 [PMID: 32607472]
  18. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Sep;169(9):855-62 [PMID: 26214387]
  19. Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5 [PMID: 15405679]
  20. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Jun;53(3):277-82 [PMID: 23731095]
  21. Clin Perinatol. 2020 Sep;47(3):435-448 [PMID: 32713443]
  22. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):123-32 [PMID: 26571288]
  23. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Jul;19(7):599-608 [PMID: 29727354]
  24. Circulation. 2015 Nov 17;132(20):1920-30 [PMID: 26572668]
  25. JAMA. 2013 Jun 19;309(23):2445-6 [PMID: 23645117]
  26. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005 May;7(5):311-4 [PMID: 15909464]
  27. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 May;101(5):585-586 [PMID: 28182259]
  28. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Jan 1;173(1):44-51 [PMID: 30419138]
  29. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Jul;32(14):2361-2368 [PMID: 29400112]
  30. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Feb;24(1):37-42 [PMID: 30322825]
  31. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e205239 [PMID: 32556257]
  32. Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2017 May 12;8:57-64 [PMID: 29388628]
  33. Pan Afr Med J. 2013 May 29;15:36 [PMID: 24062865]
  34. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Nov;24(11):1407-10 [PMID: 21299397]
  35. Pediatrics. 1996 Jun;97(6 Pt 1):832-8 [PMID: 8657523]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0NICUriskadmissionneonatesstudytermdelivery1priorbornmachinelearningfactors20intensivecareassociatedhighmaycalculationalgorithmgestationincludedmodelGBMsignificantly[1[23neonatalalongserveObjective:NeonatalunitamongsignificantmorbiditymortalitywellhealthcarecostscomprehensiveassessmentusingintegratedstatisticalapproachrareeventusedbuildgroupMethods:single-centercase−controlretrospectiveconductedAugust2005December2019includingin-hospitalsingletonlive≥37weeks’Analysesunivariatemultivariablemodelscombinedgradient-boostingprimaryaimidentifyquantifycausesResults:period206509birthsregisteredShaareZedekMedicalCenterapplyingexclusioncriteria192527529275%admittedhigherORs[95%CIs]offspringnulliparouswomen190733]diabetesmellitushypertensivecomplicationspregnancy520903]280260]respectively37thweek996341]p<001adjustedcongenitalmalformationsgeneticsyndromespredictapplieddatashowedareareceiveroperatingcharacteristiccurve75095%CI743−0757classified27%73%lowstratificationadversematernaloutcomesConclusion:presentidentifiedrankinghighlypredictivebasisindividualsuggestfuturetypeplanningwilldifferenthealthsystemshigh-low-resourceenvironmentstransferpolicyAdmissionTermNeonatesLargeSingle-CenterPopulation:ComprehensiveAssessmentRiskFactorsUsingTandemAnalysisApproach

Similar Articles

Cited By