Spatiotemporal dynamics and decoupling mechanism of economic growth and carbon emissions in an urban agglomeration of China.

Han Hu, Tiangui Lv, Xinmin Zhang, Shufei Fu, Can Geng, Zeying Li
Author Information
  1. Han Hu: School of Tourism and Urban Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, 330013, China.
  2. Tiangui Lv: School of Tourism and Urban Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, 330013, China.
  3. Xinmin Zhang: Institute of Ecological Civilization, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, 330013, China. zhangxm1217@yahoo.com.
  4. Shufei Fu: School of Tourism and Urban Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, 330013, China.
  5. Can Geng: School of Tourism and Urban Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, 330013, China.
  6. Zeying Li: School of Tourism and Urban Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, 330013, China.

Abstract

carbon emissions and economic growth are two contradictions in urban development, and their decoupling is related to the sustainable development of cities. This paper took urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River (UAMRYR), China, as the study area. The Kaya model, the Tapio decoupling model, and the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) model were adopted to analyze the spatiotemporal differentiation of carbon emissions, the decoupling of economic activities, and driving factors. The results indicate that (1) carbon emissions increased by 66% in the study period, but the growth momentum was curbed after 2015. Low level and medium level areas continue to decrease, and relatively high level area gradually become dominant. (2) Spatially, carbon emissions are in a pattern of middle-hot and east-cold. Jiangxi is in the sub-cold and coldspot area, while the hotspot area is driven by the transformation from Wuhan's single-core to Wuhan and Changsha's dual-core. (3) Since 2010, most cities have been in a good decoupling state, and weak decoupling cities have risen from 35.5% in the initial period to 87.1% in 2010-2011, but the decoupling situation of industrial cities with more high-energy-consuming industries still rebounded slightly. (4) The economic level and energy intensity effect had the most significant impact on the economic decoupling of carbon emissions, whose absolute contribution rates were greater than 35%. Urbanization and economic level both play a positive role in promoting carbon emissions, and the energy intensity plays a negative role in retarding carbon emissions. The population effect was mainly manifested in carbon increase from 2006 to 2011, and 45.2% of the cities from 2011 to 2017 turned into carbon suppression. Finally, we suggest that decoupling carbon emissions from economic growth requires developing green urbanization and a decarbonized economy, optimizing the structure of energy consumption and guiding rational population flow.

Keywords

References

  1. Aguiar, D., Costa, G., Simões, G., & Figueiredo, A. (2021). Diet-related greenhouse gas emissions in Brazilian state capital cities. Environmental Science & Policy, 124, 542–552. [DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.07.028]
  2. Alam, M. M., Murad, M. W., Nornanc, A., & Ozturk, I. (2016). Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecological Indicators, 70, 466–479. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.043]
  3. Ang, B. W., & Choi, K.-H. (1997). Decomposition of aggregate energy and gas emission intensities for industry: A refined Divisia. Energy Journal, 18, 59–73. [DOI: 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol18-No3-3]
  4. Daly, H. E. (1997). Georgescu-Roegen versus Solow/Stiglitz. Ecological Economics, 22, 261–266. [DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00080-3]
  5. Dinga, C., & Wen, Z. (2021). China’s green deal: Can China’s cement industry achieve carbon neutral emissions by 2060? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 25, 111931.
  6. Dong, J., Li, C., & Wang, Q. (2021). Decomposition of carbon emission and its decoupling analysis and prediction with economic development: A case study of industrial sectors in Henan Province. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, 129019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129019]
  7. Gao, C., Ge, H., Lu, Y., Wang, W., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Decoupling of provincial energy-related CO emissions from economic growth in China and its convergence from 1995 to 2017. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2, 126627. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126627]
  8. Han, X., Cao, T., & Sun, T. (2019). Analysis on the variation rule and influencing factors of energy consumption carbon emission intensity in China’s urbanization construction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117958. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117958]
  9. Hashmi, S. H., Fan, H., Fareed, Z., & Shahzad, F. (2021). Asymmetric nexus between urban agglomerations and environmental pollution in top ten urban agglomerated countries using quantile methods. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 1–21. [DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-10669-4]
  10. Hu, M., Li, R., You, W., Liu, Y., & Lee, C. C. (2020). Spatiotemporal evolution of decoupling and driving forces of CO emissions on economic growth along the Belt and Road. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, 123272. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123272]
  11. International Energy Agency. (2019). World energy outlook 2019. Paris, France: IEA. [DOI: 10.5089/9781513508214.081]
  12. Kang, Z., Ke, L., & Qu, J. (2018). The path of technological progress for China’s low-carbon development: Evidence from three urban agglomerations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 644–654. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.027]
  13. Kaya, Y. (1990). Impact of carbon dioxide emission control on GNP growth: Interpretation of proposed scenarios. IPCC Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group.
  14. Lefever, D. W. (1926). Measuring geographic concentration by means of the standard deviational ellipse. American Journal of Sociology, 32, 88–94. [DOI: 10.1086/214027]
  15. Liu, D., & Xiao, B. (2018). Can China achieve its carbon emission peaking? A scenario analysis based on STIRPAT and system dynamics model. Ecological Indicators, 93, 647–657. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.049]
  16. Liu, L., Chen, X., Chen, W., & Ye, X. (2020). Identifying the impact of landscape pattern on ecosystem services in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 5063–5084. [DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17145063]
  17. Liu, X., Gao, C., Song, Y., Zhang, Y., Su, Q., & Tian, Y. (2017). Temporal and spatial pattern and driving factors of carbon emissions from fossil energy consumption in Hunan. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37, 2476–2487. (in Chinese).
  18. Luo, G., Weng, J. H., Zhang, Q., & Hao, Y. (2016). A reexamination of the existence of environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: Evidence from G20 countries. Natural Hazards, 85, 1023–1042. [DOI: 10.1007/s11069-016-2618-0]
  19. Lv, T., Hu, H., Zhang, X., Xie, H., Wang, L., & Fu, S. (2022a). Spatial spillover effects of urbanization on carbon emissions in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 33920–33934. [DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17872-x]
  20. Lv, T., Hu, H., Zhang, X., Wang, L., & Fu, S. (2022b). Impact of multidimensional urbanization on carbon emissions in an ecological civilization experimental area of China - ScienceDirect. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 126, 103120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2022.103120 [DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2022.103120]
  21. Meangbua, O., Dhakal, S., & Kuwornu, J. (2019). Factors influencing energy requirements and CO emissions of households in Thailand: A panel data analysis. Energy Policy, 129, 521–531. [DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.02.050]
  22. Mclaren, D. (1992). Compact or dispersed? Dilution is no solution. Built Environmen, 18, 268–284.
  23. Moutinho, V., Moreira, C., & Silva, M. (2015). The driving forces of change in energy-related CO emissions in Eastern, Western, Northern and Southern Europe: The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 1485–1499. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.05.072]
  24. OECD. (2002). Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth. OECD.
  25. Ortega-Ruiz, G., Mena-Nieto, A., & García-Ramos, J. (2020). Is India on the right pathway to reduce CO emissions? Decomposing an enlarged Kaya identity using the LMDI method for the period 1990–2016. Science of the Total Environment, 737, 139638. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139638]
  26. Piłatowska, M., & Włodarczyk, A. (2018). Decoupling economic growth from carbon dioxide emissions in the EU countries. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14, 7–26. [DOI: 10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-1.1]
  27. Sheng, P., & Guo, X. (2016). The long-run and short-run impacts of urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions. Economic Models, 53, 208–215. [DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.12.006]
  28. Sheng, Y., Miao, Y., Song, J., & Sheng, H. (2019). The moderating effect of innovation on the relationship between urbanization and CO 2 emissions: Evidence from three major urban agglomerations in China. Sustainability, 11, 1633–1654. [DOI: 10.3390/su11061633]
  29. Song, X., Jia, J. S., Chen, C. D., & Chen, J. H. (2020). Spatio-temporal characteristics, decoupling relation and its driving factors of the carbon emission from energy consumption in underdeveloped Jiangxi Province. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 40, 7451–7463. (in Chinese).
  30. Song, Z. (2020). Economic growth and carbon emissions: Estimation of a panel threshold model for the transition process in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123773. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123773]
  31. Songchitruksa, P., & Zeng, X. (2010). Getis-Ord spatial statistics to identify hot spots by using incident management data. Transportation Research Record, 2165, 42–51. [DOI: 10.3141/2165-05]
  32. Subramanyam, V., Ahiduzzaman, M., & Kumar, A. (2017). Greenhouse gas emissions mitigation potential in the commercial and institutional sector. Energy and Buildings, 140, 295–304. [DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.02.007]
  33. Tang, C., Zhong, L., & Ng, P. (2017). Factors that influence the tourism industry’s carbon emissions: A tourism area life cycle model perspective. Energy Policy, 109, 704–718. [DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.050]
  34. Tapio, P. (2005). Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport Policy, 12, 137–151. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001]
  35. Tenaw, D., & Hawitibo, A. (2021). Carbon decoupling and economic growth in Africa: Evidence from production and consumption-based carbon emissions. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 6, 100040.
  36. Wang, L., Fan, J., Wang, J., Zhao, Y., Li, Z., & Guo, R. (2020). Spatio-temporal characteristics of the relationship between carbon emissions and economic growth in China’s transportation industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 32962–32979. [DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08841-x]
  37. Wang, Q., Zhao, M., & Li, R. (2019). Decoupling sectoral economic output from carbon emissions on city level: A comparative study of Beijing and Shanghai, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 126–133. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.188]
  38. Wang, W., Kuang, Y., Huang, N., & Zhao, D. (2014). Empirical research on decoupling relationship between energy-related carbon emission and economic growth in Guangdong province based on extended Kaya identity. The Scientific World Journal, 11, 782750.
  39. Wang, Z., & Yang, L. (2015). Delinking indicators on regional industry development and carbon emissions: Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei economic band case. Ecological Indicators, 48, 41–48. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.035]
  40. Wu, Y., Tam, V., Shuai, C., Shen, L., Zhang, Y., & Liao, S. (2019). Decoupling China’s economic growth from carbon emissions: Empirical studies from 30 Chinese provinces (2001–2015). Science of the Total Environment, 656, 576–588. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.384]
  41. Xie, H., Chen, Q., Lu, F., Wu, Q., & Wang, W. (2018). Spatial-temporal disparities, saving potential and influential factors of industrial land use efficiency: A case study in urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. Land Use Policy, 75, 518–529. [DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.027]
  42. Xu, X., Yang, G., Tan, Y., Zhuang, Q., Tang, X., Zhao, K., & Wang, S. (2016). Factors influencing industrial carbon emissions and strategies for carbon mitigation in the Yangtze River Delta of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 3607–3616. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.107]
  43. Zafeiriou, E., & Azam, M. (2017). CO emissions and economic performance in EU agriculture: Some evidence from Mediterranean countries. Ecological Indicators, 81, 104–114. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.039]

Grants

  1. 71864016/National Natural Science Foundation of China

MeSH Term

Carbon
Carbon Dioxide
China
Economic Development
Environmental Monitoring
Urbanization

Chemicals

Carbon Dioxide
Carbon

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0emissionscarbondecouplingeconomicgrowthcitieslevelareamodelurbanenergyCarbondevelopmentagglomerationUAMRYRChinastudyLMDIintensityeffectrolepopulation2011twocontradictionsrelatedsustainablepapertookmiddlereachesYangtzeRiverKayaTapioLogarithmicMeanDivisiaIndexadoptedanalyzespatiotemporaldifferentiationactivitiesdrivingfactorsresultsindicate1increased66%periodmomentumcurbed2015Lowmediumareascontinuedecreaserelativelyhighgraduallybecomedominant2Spatiallypatternmiddle-hoteast-coldJiangxisub-coldcoldspothotspotdriventransformationWuhan'ssingle-coreWuhanChangsha'sdual-core3Since2010goodstateweakrisen355%initialperiod to871%2010-2011situationindustrialhigh-energy-consumingindustriesstillreboundedslightly4The economicsignificantimpactwhoseabsolutecontributionratesgreater35%Urbanizationplaypositivepromotingplaysnegativeretardingmainlymanifestedincrease2006452%2017turnedsuppressionFinallysuggestrequiresdevelopinggreenurbanizationdecarbonizedeconomyoptimizingstructureconsumptionguidingrationalflowSpatiotemporaldynamicsmechanismDecouplingEconomic

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)