Safety of Intranasal Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes on Systemic Insulin: A Double-Blinded Placebo-Controlled Sub-Study of Memaid Trial.

L Aponte Becerra, B Galindo Mendez, F Khan, V Lioutas, P Novak, C S Mantzoros, L H Ngo, V Novak
Author Information
  1. L Aponte Becerra: Department of Neurology, SAFE Laboratory, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, USA.
  2. B Galindo Mendez: Department of Neurology, SAFE Laboratory, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, USA.
  3. F Khan: Department of Neurology, SAFE Laboratory, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, USA.
  4. V Lioutas: Department of Neurology, SAFE Laboratory, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, USA.
  5. P Novak: Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Faulkner Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  6. C S Mantzoros: Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston MA and Department of Medicine, Boston VA Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  7. L H Ngo: Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and School of Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
  8. V Novak: Department of Neurology, SAFE Laboratory, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, USA.

Abstract

Aims: To determine safety of intranasal insulin (INI) in MemAID trial participants with diabetes treated with systemic insulins.
Materials and Methods: This randomized, double-blinded trial consisted of 24-week INI or placebo treatment once daily and 24-week follow-up. Safety outcomes were: 1) Short-term effects on glycemic variability, hypoglycemic episodes on continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) at baseline and on-treatment. 2) Long-term effects on glucose metabolism and weight on INI/placebo treatment and post-treatment follow-up. Of 86 screened subjects, 14 were randomized, 9 (5 INI, 4 Placebo) completed CGM at baseline and on-treatment, and 5 (2 INI, 3 Placebo) completed treatment and follow-up.
Results: INI was safe and was not associated with serious adverse events, hypoglycemic episodes or weight gain. INI administration did not acutely affect capillary glucose. Glycemic variability on CGM decreased with INI, compared to baseline. On INI treatment, there was a long-term trend toward lower HbA1c, plasma glucose and insulin. No interactions with subcutaneous insulins were observed.
Conclusions: INI is safe in older people with diabetes treated with systemic insulins, and it is not associated with adverse events, hypoglycemia or weight gain. Future studies are needed to determine whether INI administration can reduce glycemic variability, improve insulin sensitivity and thus potentially lessen diabetes burden in this population.

Keywords

References

  1. Diabetes. 2012 Sep;61(9):2261-8 [PMID: 22586589]
  2. Metabolism. 2005 Oct;54(10):1356-61 [PMID: 16154436]
  3. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2015 Feb 06;6:13 [PMID: 25705204]
  4. Lancet Neurol. 2020 Sep;19(9):758-766 [PMID: 32730766]
  5. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010 Nov 01;4(6):1540-62 [PMID: 21129353]
  6. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Oct;11(10):623-33 [PMID: 19821754]
  7. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Feb;89:105934 [PMID: 31923471]
  8. Nat Neurosci. 2002 Jun;5(6):514-6 [PMID: 11992114]
  9. Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S85-S99 [PMID: 33298418]
  10. Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 22;9(1):2621 [PMID: 30796294]
  11. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Aug;19(8):443-445 [PMID: 28817341]
  12. Diabetologia. 2012 Jun;55(6):1773-82 [PMID: 22434537]
  13. J Neurol. 2022 Sep;269(9):4817-4835 [PMID: 35482079]
  14. Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S61-S70 [PMID: 30559232]
  15. Diabetes. 2015 Mar;64(3):1025-34 [PMID: 25249577]
  16. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jul;20(7):1563-1577 [PMID: 29508509]
  17. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57(4):1325-1334 [PMID: 28372335]
  18. Neuroendocrinology. 2013;97(2):176-82 [PMID: 22922661]
  19. Neuroscience. 2004;127(2):481-96 [PMID: 15262337]
  20. PLoS One. 2014 Jan 24;9(1):e86284 [PMID: 24475100]
  21. Diabetes Care. 2013 May;36(5):1384-95 [PMID: 23589542]
  22. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(3):751-9 [PMID: 24101698]
  23. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2012 Oct 01;11(1):17 [PMID: 23497433]
  24. Diabetes Care. 2017 Dec;40(12):1631-1640 [PMID: 29162583]
  25. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012 May 15;64(7):614-28 [PMID: 22119441]
  26. Neuroimage. 2019 Jul 1;194:120-127 [PMID: 30914385]
  27. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004 Nov;29(10):1326-34 [PMID: 15288712]
  28. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Sep;13(9):921-8 [PMID: 21714681]
  29. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 Jun;80(3):371-9 [PMID: 18304674]
  30. Neurology. 2004 Oct 12;63(7):1181-6 [PMID: 15477535]
  31. Diabetes Care. 2020 May;43(5):1146-1156 [PMID: 32312858]

Grants

  1. EP-C-15-031/EPA
  2. R01 DK103902/NIDDK NIH HHS
  3. UL1 TR002541/NCATS NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0INItreatmentglucose2insulindiabetesinsulinsfollow-upSafetyvariabilityCGMbaselineweightInsulindeterminetrialtreatedsystemicrandomized24-weekeffectsglycemichypoglycemicepisodeson-treatment5PlacebocompletedsafeassociatedadverseeventsgainadministrationIntranasalTypeDiabetesAims:safetyintranasalMemAIDparticipantsMaterialsMethods:double-blindedconsistedplacebodailyoutcomeswere:1Short-termcontinuousmonitoringLong-termmetabolismINI/placebopost-treatment86screenedsubjects14943Results:seriousacutelyaffectcapillaryGlycemicdecreasedcomparedlong-termtrendtowardlowerHbA1cplasmainteractionssubcutaneousobservedConclusions:olderpeoplehypoglycemiaFuturestudiesneededwhethercanreduceimprovesensitivitythuspotentiallylessenburdenpopulationSystemicInsulin:Double-BlindedPlacebo-ControlledSub-StudyMemaidTrialHypoglycemia

Similar Articles

Cited By