Awareness and consciousness in humans and animals - neural and behavioral correlates in an evolutionary perspective.

Günter Ehret, Raymond Romand
Author Information
  1. Günter Ehret: Institute of Neurobiology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
  2. Raymond Romand: Faculty of Medicine, Institute de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC), University of Strasbourg and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Strasbourg, France.

Abstract

Awareness or consciousness in the context of stimulus perception can directly be assessed in well controlled test situations with humans via the persons' reports about their subjective experiences with the stimuli. Since we have no direct access to subjective experiences in animals, their possible awareness or consciousness in stimulus perception tasks has often been inferred from behavior and cognitive abilities previously observed in aware and conscious humans. Here, we analyze published human data primarily on event-related potentials and brain-wave generation during perception and responding to sensory stimuli and extract neural markers (mainly latencies of evoked-potential peaks and of gamma-wave occurrence) indicating that a person became aware or conscious of the perceived stimulus. These neural correlates of consciousness were then applied to sets of corresponding data from various animals including several species of mammals, and one species each of birds, fish, cephalopods, and insects. We found that the neural markers from studies in humans could also successfully be applied to the mammal and bird data suggesting that species in these animal groups can become subjectively aware of and conscious about perceived stimuli. Fish, cephalopod and insect data remained inconclusive. In an evolutionary perspective we have to consider that both awareness of and consciousness about perceived stimuli appear as evolved, attention-dependent options added to the ongoing neural activities of stimulus processing and action generation. Since gamma-wave generation for functional coupling of brain areas in aware/conscious states is energetically highly cost-intensive, it remains to be shown which animal species under which conditions of lifestyle and ecological niche may achieve significant advantages in reproductive fitness by drawing upon these options. Hence, we started our discussion about awareness and consciousness in animals with the question in how far these expressions of brain activity are necessary attributes for perceiving stimuli and responding in an adaptive way.

Keywords

References

  1. Brain Res. 1991 Apr 19;546(2):250-60 [PMID: 2070262]
  2. Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 31;4:625 [PMID: 24198791]
  3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 24;117(47):29925-29936 [PMID: 33177231]
  4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15): [PMID: 33785543]
  5. Behav Sci (Basel). 2018 May 30;8(6): [PMID: 29849006]
  6. Cortex. 2018 May;102:161-175 [PMID: 28958417]
  7. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2021 Feb;96(1):162-178 [PMID: 32893443]
  8. Elife. 2017 Jul 18;6: [PMID: 28718763]
  9. Neuron. 2013 Oct 30;80(3):751-64 [PMID: 24183025]
  10. Cortex. 2015 Dec;73:216-27 [PMID: 26474391]
  11. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016 Dec;41:129-135 [PMID: 27664945]
  12. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2008 Jun;8(2):195-210 [PMID: 18589509]
  13. Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Oct;24(10):789-801 [PMID: 32830051]
  14. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Feb;36(2):737-46 [PMID: 22192881]
  15. Conscious Cogn. 2011 Jun;20(2):464-86 [PMID: 21349742]
  16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Jul 7;106(27):11096-101 [PMID: 19549837]
  17. Science. 2020 Sep 25;369(6511):1626-1629 [PMID: 32973028]
  18. Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Nov 26;15:765646 [PMID: 34899201]
  19. Front Psychol. 2014 Oct 08;5:1078 [PMID: 25339922]
  20. Neuron. 2011 Apr 28;70(2):200-27 [PMID: 21521609]
  21. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 02;7:43780 [PMID: 28252109]
  22. Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Mar;24(3):170-172 [PMID: 31954628]
  23. Front Psychol. 2014 Feb 05;5:62 [PMID: 24550876]
  24. Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 22;7:1954 [PMID: 28066282]
  25. Science. 2018 May 4;360(6388):537-542 [PMID: 29567809]
  26. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2009 Feb;19(1):67-74 [PMID: 19553102]
  27. Prog Neurobiol. 1992 Jul;39(1):45-112 [PMID: 1589585]
  28. Cognition. 2001 Apr;79(1-2):135-60 [PMID: 11164026]
  29. Cognition. 2001 Apr;79(1-2):1-37 [PMID: 11164022]
  30. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2016 Jun;15:9-15 [PMID: 27436727]
  31. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Mar;8(2):195-207 [PMID: 26172502]
  32. Anim Cogn. 2020 May;23(3):581-594 [PMID: 32107657]
  33. J Neurosci. 2012 Aug 8;32(32):10961-70 [PMID: 22875930]
  34. Prog Neurobiol. 1999 Oct;59(2):107-28 [PMID: 10463792]
  35. Conscious Cogn. 2013 Mar;22(1):22-34 [PMID: 23247079]
  36. Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 May;14(5):201-7 [PMID: 20363178]
  37. Curr Biol. 2007 Mar 20;17(6):551-5 [PMID: 17346969]
  38. Biol Philos. 2020 Dec 3;35:56 [PMID: 33597791]
  39. Nat Commun. 2022 Mar 22;13(1):1535 [PMID: 35318323]
  40. Behav Brain Sci. 2007 Feb;30(1):63-81; discussion 81-134 [PMID: 17475053]
  41. Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 24;12:732336 [PMID: 34630245]
  42. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Mar 26;9:157 [PMID: 25859205]
  43. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 Jul;17(7):450-61 [PMID: 27225071]
  44. Neuron. 2018 Feb 21;97(4):769-785 [PMID: 29470969]
  45. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Jul;16(7):390-8 [PMID: 22682813]
  46. Brain. 2001 Jul;124(Pt 7):1263-89 [PMID: 11408323]
  47. Brain Sci. 2021 Apr 24;11(5): [PMID: 33923218]
  48. Neuron. 2012 Sep 6;75(5):875-88 [PMID: 22958827]
  49. Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Jun;43(12):1601-11 [PMID: 27109009]
  50. Neuron. 1999 Sep;24(1):49-65, 111-25 [PMID: 10677026]
  51. Science. 2004 Dec 10;306(5703):1903-7 [PMID: 15591194]
  52. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019 Jul 16;13:25 [PMID: 31379521]
  53. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Jan;115(1):140-4 [PMID: 14706481]
  54. Integr Comp Biol. 2017 Oct 1;57(4):808-819 [PMID: 29048534]
  55. Pain. 2018 Jan;159(1):106-118 [PMID: 28953192]
  56. Front Neurosci. 2021 Apr 01;15:602437 [PMID: 33867913]
  57. Nat Neurosci. 2005 Oct;8(10):1391-400 [PMID: 16158062]
  58. J Neurosci. 2012 Oct 24;32(43):14909-14 [PMID: 23100413]
  59. PLoS Biol. 2009 Mar 17;7(3):e61 [PMID: 19296722]
  60. Conscious Cogn. 2000 Jun;9(2 Pt 1):288-307 [PMID: 10924249]
  61. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019 Jul 24;13:31 [PMID: 31680883]
  62. PLoS Biol. 2007 Oct;5(10):e260 [PMID: 17896866]
  63. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 29;362(1485):1585-99 [PMID: 17428779]
  64. Conscious Cogn. 2010 Jun;19(2):580-96 [PMID: 20382038]
  65. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Jan 1;5(1):16-25 [PMID: 11164732]
  66. Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Jul 07;14:36 [PMID: 32733211]
  67. Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 1;101:337-50 [PMID: 25063731]
  68. Curr Biol. 2013 Jul 8;23(13):R577-84 [PMID: 23845249]
  69. J Neurosci. 1998 Sep 15;18(18):7381-93 [PMID: 9736658]
  70. Conscious Cogn. 2006 Jun;15(2):358-71 [PMID: 16260154]
  71. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015 Mar 02;7(3):a021667 [PMID: 25731765]
  72. Front Neurosci. 2019 Oct 31;13:1169 [PMID: 31749675]
  73. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 13;8(6):e66363 [PMID: 23785494]
  74. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Dec;15(6):686-93 [PMID: 16263260]
  75. Science. 1984 Jan 13;223(4632):186-8 [PMID: 6691145]
  76. Neuron. 2012 Feb 23;73(4):653-76 [PMID: 22365542]
  77. J Exp Biol. 2007 Oct;210(Pt 20):3559-67 [PMID: 17921157]
  78. Neuropsychologia. 2021 Jul 30;158:107910 [PMID: 34090867]
  79. Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 09;4:501 [PMID: 23950750]
  80. Brain Neurosci Adv. 2018 Nov 22;2:2398212818816019 [PMID: 32166164]
  81. J Exp Biol. 2021 Apr 15;224(8): [PMID: 33914032]
  82. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jul;21(7):1435-46 [PMID: 18702582]
  83. Neuron. 2012 Jun 7;74(5):924-35 [PMID: 22681695]
  84. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 04;6:199 [PMID: 23055959]
  85. J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 28;30(30):10158-68 [PMID: 20668199]
  86. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):46-52 [PMID: 15668096]
  87. Biol Psychol. 2016 Apr;116:28-35 [PMID: 26196895]
  88. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 24;98(9):5359-62 [PMID: 11274360]
  89. Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 21;9:2777 [PMID: 30846963]
  90. Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Aug;25(8):660-670 [PMID: 34172384]
  91. Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Dec;19(12):757-770 [PMID: 26585549]
  92. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 3;106(5):1672-7 [PMID: 19164526]
  93. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003 Apr;28(4):675-82 [PMID: 12655312]
  94. J Neurophysiol. 2005 Dec;94(6):4269-80 [PMID: 16093343]
  95. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Apr;20(4):291-303 [PMID: 26944218]
  96. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 May;34(6):922-34 [PMID: 20005249]
  97. J Neurosci. 2020 Jun 17;40(25):4925-4935 [PMID: 32409620]
  98. Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 14;11:568049 [PMID: 33154726]
  99. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012 Jan;36(1):191-7 [PMID: 21651927]
  100. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2016 Jun;15:61-9 [PMID: 27436733]
  101. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Oct;69:1-14 [PMID: 27461916]
  102. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Apr;2(4):229-39 [PMID: 11283746]
  103. Conscious Cogn. 2005 Mar;14(1):119-39 [PMID: 15766894]
  104. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Mar 21;114(12):3258-3263 [PMID: 28193875]
  105. Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:235-43 [PMID: 26944872]
  106. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2017 Dec;24:58-67 [PMID: 29208224]
  107. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jun 18;110 Suppl 2:10357-64 [PMID: 23754370]
  108. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 31;117(13):7437-7446 [PMID: 32184331]
  109. J Theor Biol. 2002 Feb 21;214(4):657-64 [PMID: 11851374]
  110. J Neurosci. 2007 Mar 14;27(11):2858-65 [PMID: 17360907]
  111. Front Neurosci. 2019 May 17;13:510 [PMID: 31156381]
  112. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;3(1):73-9 [PMID: 18584056]
  113. Curr Biol. 2013 Dec 2;23(23):R1033-5 [PMID: 24309275]
  114. Front Psychol. 2010 Dec 20;1:217 [PMID: 21833272]
  115. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019 Jul 04;13:24 [PMID: 31333422]
  116. Conscious Cogn. 2000 Jun;9(2 Pt 1):313-23; discussion 324-6 [PMID: 10924251]
  117. Conscious Cogn. 2011 Sep;20(3):972-83 [PMID: 21482150]
  118. J Neurosci. 2021 May 26;41(21):4686-4696 [PMID: 33849946]
  119. Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Aug 13;14:57 [PMID: 32903840]
  120. Conscious Cogn. 2009 Jun;18(2):500-14 [PMID: 18701321]
  121. Neuron. 2006 Dec 7;52(5):751-66 [PMID: 17145498]
  122. Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Jul 06;15:648860 [PMID: 34295226]
  123. Anesthesiology. 1997 Aug;87(2):387-410 [PMID: 9286904]
  124. Science. 2006 Sep 15;313(5793):1626-8 [PMID: 16973878]
  125. J Neurosci. 2014 Mar 19;34(12):4382-95 [PMID: 24647958]
  126. Brain Struct Funct. 2011 Sep;216(3):239-54 [PMID: 21293877]
  127. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Sep;23(9):754-768 [PMID: 31375408]
  128. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 18;104(38):15111-6 [PMID: 17848520]
  129. Neuron. 2015 Oct 7;88(1):220-35 [PMID: 26447583]
  130. J Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Jun 1;33(7):1295-1310 [PMID: 34496396]
  131. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016 May;17(5):307-21 [PMID: 27094080]
  132. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2012 Jun;71(6):531-46 [PMID: 22592840]
  133. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019 Oct 25;13:58 [PMID: 31708755]
  134. Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jun;6(6):579-86 [PMID: 12717438]
  135. J Exp Biol. 2008 Jun;211(Pt 11):1792-804 [PMID: 18490395]
  136. J Comp Physiol A. 1991 Jan;168(1):141-50 [PMID: 2033566]
  137. Front Syst Neurosci. 2021 Sep 10;15:741579 [PMID: 34566590]
  138. Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Nov 11;14:541670 [PMID: 33262694]
  139. J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 5;28(10):2667-79 [PMID: 18322110]
  140. Physiol Rev. 2020 Jul 1;100(3):1019-1063 [PMID: 32233912]
  141. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):927-36 [PMID: 22683275]
  142. Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Nov 16;283(1842): [PMID: 27852803]
  143. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Aug 12;111(32):11750-5 [PMID: 25071167]
  144. Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 19;12(1):1149 [PMID: 33608533]
  145. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015 Jul-Aug;6(4):383-395 [PMID: 26263427]
  146. PLoS Biol. 2019 Feb 7;17(2):e3000021 [PMID: 30730878]
  147. Learn Behav. 2021 Mar;49(1):9-22 [PMID: 32661811]
  148. PLoS Biol. 2022 Feb 17;20(2):e3001529 [PMID: 35176032]
  149. Elife. 2015 Oct 13;4:e08760 [PMID: 26460547]
  150. Conscious Cogn. 2005 Mar;14(1):140-68 [PMID: 15766895]
  151. PLoS Biol. 2019 Feb 7;17(2):e3000112 [PMID: 30730875]
  152. Trends Neurosci. 2009 Sep;32(9):476-84 [PMID: 19716185]
  153. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug;16(8):411-7 [PMID: 22795561]
  154. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1284:9-22 [PMID: 32852736]
  155. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Oct 5;367(1603):2715-22 [PMID: 22927570]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0consciousnessneuralstimulistimulushumansanimalsdataspeciesbrainperceptionawarenessawareconsciousgenerationperceivedcorrelatesAwarenesscansubjectiveexperiencesSinceevent-relatedpotentialsrespondingmarkersgamma-waveappliedanimalevolutionaryperspectiveoptionsactivitycontextdirectlyassessedwellcontrolledtestsituationsviapersons'reportsdirectaccesspossibletasksofteninferredbehaviorcognitiveabilitiespreviouslyobservedanalyzepublishedhumanprimarilybrain-wavesensoryextractmainlylatenciesevoked-potentialpeaksoccurrenceindicatingpersonbecamesetscorrespondingvariousincludingseveralmammalsonebirdsfishcephalopodsinsectsfoundstudiesalsosuccessfullymammalbirdsuggestinggroupsbecomesubjectivelyFishcephalopodinsectremainedinconclusiveconsiderappearevolvedattention-dependentaddedongoingactivitiesprocessingactionfunctionalcouplingareasaware/consciousstatesenergeticallyhighlycost-intensiveremainsshownconditionslifestyleecologicalnichemayachievesignificantadvantagesreproductivefitnessdrawinguponHencestarteddiscussionquestionfarexpressionsnecessaryattributesperceivingadaptiveway-behavioralEEGERPenergycostswavesgamma-bandselectiveattention

Similar Articles

Cited By