Facilitative Effects of Embodied English Instruction in Chinese Children.

Connie Qun Guan, Wanjin Meng
Author Information
  1. Connie Qun Guan: School of Foreign Studies, Beijing Language and Culture University, Beijing, China.
  2. Wanjin Meng: Department of Moral, Psychological and Special Education, China National Institute of Education Sciences, Beijing, China.

Abstract

Research into the lexical quality of word representations suggests that building a strong sound, form, and meaning association is a crucial first step for vocabulary learning. For children who are learning a second language (L2), explicit instruction on word morphology is generally more focused on whole word, rather than sub-lexical, meaning. Though morphological training is emphasized in first language (L1) vocabulary instruction, it is unknown whether this training facilitates L2 word learning through sub-lexical support. To test this, we designed three experimental learning conditions investigating embodied morphological instruction [i.e., hand writing roots (HR), dragging roots (DR), gesturing roots (GR)] to compare against a control condition. One hundred students were randomly assigned to the four experimental groups. Pre- and post-tests examining knowledge of word meanings, forms, and sounds were administered. Results of mixed linear modeling revealed that three embodied morphological instruction on roots enhanced L2 vocabulary learning. Hand writing roots facilitated sound-meaning integration in all category-tasks for accessibility to word form and one task for word sound-form association. By contrast, GR facilitated meaning-based learning integration in two out of three category tasks for word form-meaning association. Chunking and DR facilitated meaning-based integration in one out of three category tasks for word form-meaning association. These results provide evidence that the underlying embodied morphological training mechanism contributes to L2 vocabulary learning during direct instruction. Future directions and implications are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Aug;43(8):1298-1338 [PMID: 28318285]
  2. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 May;11(5):351-60 [PMID: 20383203]
  3. Read Writ. 2015 Feb;28(2):271-289 [PMID: 25663748]
  4. Neuropsychologia. 2014 Nov;64:41-53 [PMID: 25234645]
  5. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2013 May;4(3):319-325 [PMID: 26304209]
  6. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 9;105(36):13269-73 [PMID: 18765806]
  7. Brain Sci. 2021 Feb 26;11(3): [PMID: 33652707]
  8. J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Jun;122:92-103 [PMID: 24549229]
  9. Psychol Sci. 2021 Jul;32(7):1086-1103 [PMID: 34184564]
  10. Cogn Sci. 2016 Sep;40(7):1831-1849 [PMID: 26400648]
  11. Front Psychol. 2014 Apr 24;5:359 [PMID: 24795687]
  12. Dev Sci. 2012 Mar;15(2):165-80 [PMID: 22356173]
  13. Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:257-83 [PMID: 22830562]
  14. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):37-55 [PMID: 29698045]
  15. Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Oct;4(4):731-9 [PMID: 22961943]
  16. Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 20;2:59 [PMID: 21687437]
  17. Front Psychol. 2021 May 28;12:628160 [PMID: 34122220]
  18. Cognition. 2019 Jun;187:178-187 [PMID: 30877849]
  19. Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 23;11:575032 [PMID: 33329219]
  20. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jun;149:1-8 [PMID: 24632521]
  21. J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1162-1177 [PMID: 28294712]
  22. Brain Res Bull. 2006 Oct 16;70(4-6):430-43 [PMID: 17027779]
  23. Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 09;5:1467 [PMID: 25538671]
  24. Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 23;4:567 [PMID: 24069007]
  25. Dev Sci. 2010 Mar;13(2):279-88 [PMID: 20136924]
  26. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Mar;145(3):298-313 [PMID: 26726913]
  27. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Jun 1;5(6):236-243 [PMID: 11390294]
  28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 19;102(29):10393-8 [PMID: 15985550]
  29. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jul;19(7):1175-92 [PMID: 17583993]
  30. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):517-23 [PMID: 25002252]
  31. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Jul;6(7):576-82 [PMID: 15959465]
  32. Dev Psychol. 2015 Aug;51(8):1105-14 [PMID: 26214229]
  33. Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 15;102 Pt 2:695-703 [PMID: 25175538]
  34. Commun Biol. 2021 Apr 6;4(1):443 [PMID: 33824412]
  35. Adv Cogn Psychol. 2012;8(2):144-54 [PMID: 22723813]
  36. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2011 Nov;2(6):595-607 [PMID: 24187604]
  37. Psychol Bull. 2011 Mar;137(2):297-315 [PMID: 21355631]
  38. Exp Brain Res. 2003 Sep;152(2):229-42 [PMID: 12879170]
  39. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018;3(1):6 [PMID: 29541685]
  40. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;8(5):573-85 [PMID: 26173215]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0wordlearninginstructionmorphologicalrootsassociationvocabularylanguageL2trainingthreeembodiedfacilitatedintegrationformmeaningfirstsecondexplicitsub-lexicalexperimentalwritingDRGRonemeaning-basedcategorytasksform-meaningEnglishResearchlexicalqualityrepresentationssuggestsbuildingstrongsoundcrucialstepchildrenmorphologygenerallyfocusedwholeratherThoughemphasizedL1unknownwhetherfacilitatessupporttestdesignedconditionsinvestigating[iehandHRdragginggesturing]comparecontrolconditionOnehundredstudentsrandomlyassignedfourgroupsPre-post-testsexaminingknowledgemeaningsformssoundsadministeredResultsmixedlinearmodelingrevealedenhancedHandsound-meaningcategory-tasksaccessibilitytasksound-formcontrasttwoChunkingresultsprovideevidenceunderlyingmechanismcontributesdirectFuturedirectionsimplicationsdiscussedFacilitativeEffectsEmbodiedInstructionChineseChildrencognitiongesturehandwriting

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)