Testing an educational intervention to improve health care providers' preparedness to care for victims of elder abuse: a mixed method pilot study.

Johanna Simmons, Atbin Motamedi, Mikael Ludvigsson, Katarina Swahnberg
Author Information
  1. Johanna Simmons: Department of Acute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics in Linköping, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. johanna.simmons@liu.se.
  2. Atbin Motamedi: Department of Emergency Medicine in Norrköping, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  3. Mikael Ludvigsson: Department of Acute Internal Medicine and Geriatrics in Linköping, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  4. Katarina Swahnberg: Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Elder abuse is prevalent and associated with ill-health. However, health care providers often lack education about elder abuse and older patients' victimization often remains unknown to them. In this pilot study we performed initial testing of an educational model aiming at improving health care providers' preparedness to care for older adults subjected to abuse, or more specifically their self-reported propensity to ask older patients questions about abuse and perceived ability to manage the response.
METHODS: The educational model consisted of a full training day about elder abuse, including theory, group discussions and forum theatre. Forum theatre is an interactive form of drama in which participants are not only observers, but rather spect-actors, urged to participate in the scene. They are thereby given the opportunity to discuss and practise difficult health care encounters. Medical interns (intervention group n = 16, control group n = 14) in Sweden participated in the study and a mixed method convergent parallel design was used. Quantitative data was collected at baseline and 6 months post-intervention using a questionnaire (the REAGERA-P). Qualitative interviews were conducted with four of the participants in the intervention group and data was analysed using qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS: The reported frequency of asking older patients questions about abuse increased in the intervention group (p = 0.047), but not the control group (p = 0.38) post-intervention. Potential mediators for the improvement were an increased awareness of elder abuse and higher self-efficacy for asking questions about elder abuse. Participants also reported a higher perceived ability to manage cases of elder abuse, even though uncertainties concerning how to provide the best possible care remained. The qualitative interviews indicated that learning from each other in group discussions and forum theatre likely was an important contributor to the positive results.
CONCLUSION: This pilot test indicated that the educational model may be effective in improving health care providers' preparedness to care for older adults subjected to abuse. However, uncertainties about how to handle elder abuse cases remained post-intervention. In a future full-scale test of the model more focus needs to be put on how to manage cases of elder abuse.

Keywords

References

  1. Nurse Educ Pract. 2012 May;12(3):139-42 [PMID: 22094107]
  2. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 12;373(20):1947-56 [PMID: 26559573]
  3. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 May;61(5):679-85 [PMID: 23590291]
  4. J Interpers Violence. 2011 Jan;26(2):254-68 [PMID: 20457844]
  5. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021 Jul;22(3):466-480 [PMID: 31291837]
  6. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jun;63(6):1214-38 [PMID: 26096395]
  7. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2011 Jul;23(3):213-33 [PMID: 27119527]
  8. BMC Geriatr. 2022 Mar 28;22(1):256 [PMID: 35351038]
  9. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2021 Oct;22(4):944-960 [PMID: 31823685]
  10. Fam Med. 2005 Jul-Aug;37(7):481-5 [PMID: 15988632]
  11. BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 26;22(1):456 [PMID: 35619083]
  12. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2016 Sep-Dec;29(3):217-222 [PMID: 28406106]
  13. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Jan;64(1):168-73 [PMID: 26782868]
  14. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):58 [PMID: 32093709]
  15. ISRN Nurs. 2011;2011:510692 [PMID: 22254143]
  16. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88 [PMID: 16204405]
  17. Gerontol Geriatr Educ. 2018 Oct-Dec;39(4):445-463 [PMID: 27352224]
  18. Lancet. 2001 Aug 11;358(9280):483-8 [PMID: 11513933]
  19. Gerontology. 2013;59(2):132-42 [PMID: 22922225]
  20. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2017 Mar;29(2-3):102-133 [PMID: 28339321]
  21. Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;14(4):549-555 [PMID: 30694436]
  22. BMJ Open. 2022 May 4;12(5):e060314 [PMID: 35508341]
  23. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 19;21(1):473 [PMID: 34006271]
  24. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2018 Nov-Dec;30(5):354-367 [PMID: 30132733]
  25. Scand J Caring Sci. 2006 Jun;20(2):151-9 [PMID: 16756520]
  26. Gerontologist. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):472-482 [PMID: 30576536]
  27. Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Feb;5(2):e147-e156 [PMID: 28104184]
  28. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2010 Dec;110(12):703-11 [PMID: 21178151]
  29. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2012;24(1):17-36 [PMID: 22206510]
  30. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2020 Jan-Feb;32(1):72-83 [PMID: 32085693]
  31. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 15;17(16): [PMID: 32824182]
  32. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2020 Mar-May;32(2):173-195 [PMID: 32148186]
  33. J Interpers Violence. 2020 Nov;35(23-24):6041-6066 [PMID: 29294874]
  34. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12 [PMID: 14769454]
  35. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 Oct;17(10):826-38 [PMID: 19916205]
  36. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 16;(8):CD010321 [PMID: 27528431]
  37. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2022 Jan-Feb;34(1):20-37 [PMID: 34895081]
  38. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2020 Nov-Dec;32(5):409-433 [PMID: 32957832]

Grants

  1. 03384/2019/Swedish Crime Victim Fund
  2. 03384/2019/Swedish Crime Victim Fund
  3. 03384/2019/Swedish Crime Victim Fund
  4. 03384/2019/Swedish Crime Victim Fund
  5. RÖ-937398/Region Östergötland

MeSH Term

Aged
Elder Abuse
Health Personnel
Humans
Pilot Projects
Self Efficacy
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0abusecareeldergrouphealtholdereducationalmodeltheatreinterventionpilotstudyproviders'preparednessquestionsmanageForumpost-interventioncasesHoweverofteneducationimprovingadultssubjectedpatientsperceivedabilitydiscussionsforumparticipantsMedicalcontrolmixedmethoddatausinginterviewsqualitativereportedaskingincreasedp = 0higheruncertaintiesremainedindicatedtestBACKGROUND:Elderprevalentassociatedill-healthproviderslackpatients'victimizationremainsunknownperformedinitialtestingaimingspecificallyself-reportedpropensityaskresponseMETHODS:consistedfulltrainingdayincludingtheoryinteractiveformdramaobserversratherspect-actorsurgedparticipatescenetherebygivenopportunitydiscusspractisedifficultencountersinternsn = 16n = 14SwedenparticipatedconvergentparalleldesignusedQuantitativecollectedbaseline6 monthsquestionnaireREAGERA-PQualitativeconductedfouranalysedcontentanalysisRESULTS:frequency04738Potentialmediatorsimprovementawarenessself-efficacyParticipantsalsoeventhoughconcerningprovidebestpossiblelearninglikelyimportantcontributorpositiveresultsCONCLUSION:mayeffectivehandlefuturefull-scalefocusneedsputTestingimprovevictimsabuse:playIntimatepartnerviolence

Similar Articles

Cited By