Microbiological Quality and Presence of Foodborne Pathogens in Raw and Extruded Canine Diets and Canine Fecal Samples.

Doina Solís, Magaly Toro, Paola Navarrete, Patricio Faúndez, Angélica Reyes-Jara
Author Information
  1. Doina Solís: Laboratorio de Microbiología y Probióticos, Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos (INTA), Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  2. Magaly Toro: Laboratorio de Microbiología y Probióticos, Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos (INTA), Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  3. Paola Navarrete: Laboratorio de Microbiología y Probióticos, Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos (INTA), Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  4. Patricio Faúndez: Red de Atención Veterinaria, Hospital de Alta Complejidad Bilbao, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
  5. Angélica Reyes-Jara: Laboratorio de Microbiología y Probióticos, Instituto de Nutrición y Tecnología de los Alimentos (INTA), Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.

Abstract

Pet food can be a source of microbiological hazards that might affect companion animals and owners. Even though owners usually rely on conventional pet diets, such as extruded diets, new feeding practices, such as raw meat-based diets (RMBDs), have grown. RMBDs' benefits are still scientifically uncertain, while its risks have been documented. The use of canine RMBDs might increase the exposure to zoonotic pathogens, such as spp., spp., among others. Identifying pathogen prevalence in canine food and pets is required to contribute to public health measures. The aims of this study were: (1) to compare the microbiological quality of RMBDs and extruded diets (2) to identify and compare the prevalence of , and from raw and extruded canine diets and canine fecal samples, and (3) to characterize pet owners according to the diet chosen to be used on their pets, their motivations for using RMBDs, and their knowledge about benefits and risks related to this feeding practice. Conventional and molecular microbiological methods were used to identify pathogen presence from food and fecal samples, while pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed to evaluate the clonal relationship between isolates. Aerobic plate counts for RMBDs were higher than those detected for extruded diets. spp. and were isolated from 35.7% (15/42) RMBDs, while spp., , and from 33.3% (11/33) fecal samples from RMBD-fed dogs. From the RMBD samples positive to spp., chicken was the main meat ingredient composing the diets. PFGE analysis confirmed a genetic association between spp. isolates from fecal and raw food samples from the same household. We did not detect pathogens from extruded food samples or feces from extruded-fed dogs. Using a survey, we identified dog owners' unawareness and/or underestimation of risks related to RMBDs. We demonstrated that canine raw pet food might be a source of zoonotic foodborne pathogens that represent a health risk for both humans and pets. While clinical findings caused by the mentioned pathogens vary among pets, the zoonotic potential implies a significant concern.

Keywords

References

  1. Early Child Educ J. 2021;49(5):763-774 [PMID: 34054286]
  2. Int J Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Spring;10(2):486-9 [PMID: 23843808]
  3. J Food Prot. 2007 Jul;70(7):1656-62 [PMID: 17685339]
  4. Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 27;11(3): [PMID: 33673475]
  5. Front Microbiol. 2020 Jan 10;10:2920 [PMID: 31998253]
  6. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006 Feb 15;228(4):537-42 [PMID: 16478425]
  7. Restor Dent Endod. 2017 May;42(2):152-155 [PMID: 28503482]
  8. BMC Vet Res. 2019 Mar 4;15(1):74 [PMID: 30832667]
  9. J Small Anim Pract. 2019 Jun;60(6):329-339 [PMID: 31025713]
  10. BMC Vet Res. 2015 Sep 17;11:239 [PMID: 26381479]
  11. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 May 01;69(17):509-514 [PMID: 32352955]
  12. Vet Rec. 2020 Jun 27;186(19):643 [PMID: 32554799]
  13. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006 May 15;228(10):1524-32 [PMID: 16677120]
  14. Vet Rec. 2018 Jan 13;182(2):50 [PMID: 29326391]
  15. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2014 Sep;11(9):706-9 [PMID: 24824368]
  16. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005 May;11(5):694-8 [PMID: 15890121]
  17. Restor Dent Endod. 2019 Jul 17;44(3):e26 [PMID: 31485422]
  18. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 27;17(11): [PMID: 32471058]
  19. Microbiol Spectr. 2019 May;7(3): [PMID: 31837132]
  20. Can Vet J. 2002 Jun;43(6):441-2 [PMID: 12058569]
  21. R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Oct 16;6(10):191170 [PMID: 31824726]
  22. Zoonoses Public Health. 2008 Oct;55(8-10):462-9 [PMID: 18811907]
  23. Can Vet J. 2007 Jan;48(1):69-75 [PMID: 17310625]
  24. Braz J Microbiol. 2018 Nov;49 Suppl 1:113-118 [PMID: 30181050]
  25. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019 May 31;4(2): [PMID: 31159338]
  26. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2013 Dec 1;243(11):1549-58 [PMID: 24261804]
  27. Front Vet Sci. 2021 Mar 30;8:630465 [PMID: 33860004]
  28. PLoS One. 2020 Apr 14;15(4):e0231275 [PMID: 32287295]
  29. Top Companion Anim Med. 2008 Aug;23(3):133-6 [PMID: 18656840]
  30. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2011;21(3):203-9 [PMID: 22420233]
  31. Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Dec;141(12):2526-35 [PMID: 23445833]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fooddietssppRMBDssamplespetextrudedrawcaninepathogenspetsfecalmicrobiologicalmightownersriskszoonoticsourcefeedingmeat-basedbenefitsamongpathogenprevalencehealthcompareidentifyusedrelatedPFGEisolatesdogsfoodborneCaninePetcanhazardsaffectcompanionanimalsEventhoughusuallyrelyconventionalnewpracticesgrownRMBDs'stillscientificallyuncertaindocumenteduseincreaseexposureothersIdentifyingrequiredcontributepublicmeasuresaimsstudywere:1quality23characterizeaccordingdietchosenmotivationsusingknowledgepracticeConventionalmolecularmethodspresencepulsed-fieldgelelectrophoresisperformedevaluateclonalrelationshipAerobicplatecountshigherdetectedisolated357%15/42333%11/33RMBD-fedRMBDpositivechickenmainmeatingredientcomposinganalysisconfirmedgeneticassociationhouseholddetectfecesextruded-fedUsingsurveyidentifieddogowners'unawarenessand/orunderestimationdemonstratedrepresentriskhumansclinicalfindingscausedmentionedvarypotentialimpliessignificantconcernMicrobiologicalQualityPresenceFoodbornePathogensRawExtrudedDietsFecalSamplesCampylobacterListeriamonocytogenesSalmonellasafety

Similar Articles

Cited By