A Novel Plant-Based Protein Has Similar Effects Compared to Whey Protein on Body Composition, Strength, Power, and Aerobic Performance in Professional and Semi-Professional Futsal Players.

Filipe J Teixeira, Catarina N Matias, João Faleiro, Rita Giro, Joana Pires, Helena Figueiredo, Raquel Carvalhinho, Cristina P Monteiro, Joana F Reis, Maria J Valamatos, Vítor H Teixeira, Brad J Schoenfeld
Author Information
  1. Filipe J Teixeira: Bettery Lifelab, Bettery S.A., Lisboa, Portugal.
  2. Catarina N Matias: Bettery Lifelab, Bettery S.A., Lisboa, Portugal.
  3. João Faleiro: Bettery Lifelab, Bettery S.A., Lisboa, Portugal.
  4. Rita Giro: Bettery Lifelab, Bettery S.A., Lisboa, Portugal.
  5. Joana Pires: Grupo de Ativistas em Tratamentos, Lisboa, Portugal.
  6. Helena Figueiredo: José de Mello Saúde, Lisboa, Portugal.
  7. Raquel Carvalhinho: Bettery Lifelab, Bettery S.A., Lisboa, Portugal.
  8. Cristina P Monteiro: Interdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz-Quebrada, Portugal.
  9. Joana F Reis: Interdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz-Quebrada, Portugal.
  10. Maria J Valamatos: Interdisciplinary Center for the Study of Human Performance, Universidade de Lisboa, Cruz-Quebrada, Portugal.
  11. Vítor H Teixeira: Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
  12. Brad J Schoenfeld: Health Sciences Department, Lehman College, City University of New York, Bronx, NY, United States.

Abstract

Introduction: The effects of dietary protein on body composition and physical performance seemingly depend on the essential amino acid profile of the given protein source, although controversy exists about whether animal protein sources may possess additional anabolic properties to plant-based protein sources.
Purpose: To compare the effects of a novel plant-based protein matrix and whey protein supplementation on body composition, strength, power, and endurance performance of trained futsal players.
Methods: Fifty male futsal players were followed during 8 weeks of supplementation, with 40 completing the study either with plant-based protein ( = 20) or whey protein ( = 20). The following measures were assessed: bone mineral content, lean body mass, and fat mass; muscle thickness of the rectus femoris; total body water; blood glucose, hematocrit, C-reactive protein, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, creatine kinase, creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate; salivary cortisol; maximal strength and 1-RM testing of the back squat and bench press exercises; muscle power and countermovement jump; VO and maximal aerobic speed. Subjects were asked to maintain regular dietary habits and record dietary intake every 4 weeks through 3-day food records.
Results: No differences in any variable were observed between groups at baseline or pre- to post-intervention. Moreover, no timegroup interaction was observed in any of the studied variables, and a time effect was only observed regarding fat mass reduction.
Conclusions: Supplementing with either a novel plant-based protein matrix or whey protein did not affect any of the variables assessed in high-level futsal players over 8 wks. These results suggest that whey protein does not possess any unique anabolic properties over and above those of plant-based proteins when equated to an essential amino acid profile in the population studied. Furthermore, when consuming a daily protein intake >1.6 g/kg BW.day, additional protein supplementation does not affect body composition or performance in trained futsal players, regardless of protein type/source.

Keywords

References

  1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Jan;51(1):56-64 [PMID: 30102677]
  2. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Mar;103(3):738-46 [PMID: 26817506]
  3. Biol Sport. 2020 Sep;37(3):255-259 [PMID: 32879547]
  4. J Anat. 2006 Sep;209(3):289-310 [PMID: 16928199]
  5. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 Mar;122(3):561-589 [PMID: 35067750]
  6. Nephron. 1976;16(1):31-41 [PMID: 1244564]
  7. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2017 Dec;15(2):76-80 [PMID: 29541136]
  8. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Dec;96(6):1454-64 [PMID: 23134885]
  9. J Am Coll Nutr. 2013;32(2):122-35 [PMID: 24015719]
  10. Br J Sports Med. 2021 Apr;55(8):416 [PMID: 33097528]
  11. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2009 Mar 11;6:8 [PMID: 19284589]
  12. Clin Nutr. 2016 Feb;35(1):27-33 [PMID: 25702958]
  13. J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Jan 1;36(1):232-237 [PMID: 31895285]
  14. J Sports Sci Med. 2013 Mar 01;12(1):74-9 [PMID: 24149728]
  15. Int J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;39(7):517-526 [PMID: 29768643]
  16. Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 12;12:625126 [PMID: 33643155]
  17. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2010 Dec;50(4):395-9 [PMID: 21178924]
  18. Sports (Basel). 2019 Jan 04;7(1): [PMID: 30621129]
  19. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983 Nov;55(5):1558-64 [PMID: 6643191]
  20. J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Dec;31(12):3343-3350 [PMID: 28225522]
  21. Int J Sports Med. 1988 Aug;9(4):261-6 [PMID: 3182156]
  22. J Nutr. 2015 Sep;145(9):1981-91 [PMID: 26224750]
  23. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Dec;23(9):2605-13 [PMID: 19910813]
  24. Nutrients. 2020 Aug 09;12(8): [PMID: 32784847]
  25. Nutrition. 2004 Jul-Aug;20(7-8):662-8 [PMID: 15212749]
  26. Int J Sports Med. 1996 Oct;17(7):525-9 [PMID: 8912068]
  27. Front Nutr. 2017 Dec 21;4:64 [PMID: 29312948]
  28. Clin Nutr. 2021 May;40(5):3123-3132 [PMID: 33358231]
  29. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2016 Sep 29;13:64 [PMID: 27708684]
  30. J Nutr. 2018 Nov 1;148(11):1760-1775 [PMID: 30383278]
  31. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Apr;85(4):1031-40 [PMID: 17413102]
  32. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013 Oct;14(10):775.e5-11 [PMID: 23958225]
  33. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021 Jul;75(7):1060-1068 [PMID: 33727706]
  34. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Mar;48(3):543-68 [PMID: 26891166]
  35. Biol Sport. 2016 Sep;33(3):297-304 [PMID: 27601786]
  36. Int J Sports Med. 2021 Jan;42(1):27-32 [PMID: 32770535]
  37. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2017 Jun 20;14:20 [PMID: 28642676]
  38. J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Oct;23(7):2163-6 [PMID: 19855347]
  39. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2015 Jan 21;12(1):3 [PMID: 25628520]
  40. Nutr J. 2013 Jun 20;12:86 [PMID: 23782948]
  41. J Sports Sci. 2011;29 Suppl 1:S7-15 [PMID: 21793767]
  42. Nutrients. 2022 Jan 17;14(2): [PMID: 35057566]
  43. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2006 Feb;16(1):65-77 [PMID: 16676704]
  44. Am J Physiol. 1999 Apr;276(4):E628-34 [PMID: 10198297]
  45. J Sports Sci. 2008 Jan 1;26(1):63-73 [PMID: 17899472]
  46. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4 [PMID: 24141714]
  47. Nutrients. 2021 May 12;13(5): [PMID: 34065984]
  48. Sports Biomech. 2014 Sep;13(3):230-40 [PMID: 25224298]
  49. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2012 Aug;52(4):366-74 [PMID: 22828458]
  50. J Sci Med Sport. 2009 Jul;12(4):490-4 [PMID: 18554983]
  51. Nutrients. 2016 Sep 07;8(9): [PMID: 27618091]
  52. Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 24;11:1709 [PMID: 32793058]
  53. Sports Med. 2022 Jun;52(6):1295-1328 [PMID: 35113389]
  54. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Aug 1;110(2):508-518 [PMID: 31240303]
  55. Sports Med. 2022 Mar;52(3):441-461 [PMID: 34822138]
  56. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2020 Dec 1;17(1):60 [PMID: 33261645]
  57. Int J Sports Med. 2010 May;31(5):347-52 [PMID: 20180176]
  58. Nutrients. 2017 Sep 04;9(9): [PMID: 28869573]
  59. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Aug;86(2):373-81 [PMID: 17684208]
  60. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2015 Oct 20;12:39 [PMID: 26500462]
  61. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995 Sep;27(9):1292-301 [PMID: 8531628]
  62. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Mar;52(6):376-384 [PMID: 28698222]
  63. Med J Armed Forces India. 2020 Jan;76(1):41-46 [PMID: 32020967]
  64. Physiol Meas. 2021 Apr 06;42(3): [PMID: 33592586]
  65. Front Nutr. 2019 Sep 10;6:147 [PMID: 31552263]
  66. J Appl Biomech. 2016 Dec;32(6):578-585 [PMID: 27620134]
  67. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989 Jun;60(2):144-51 [PMID: 2489835]
  68. J Nutr Metab. 2016;2016:9104792 [PMID: 27807480]
  69. J Sports Sci. 1994 Summer;12 Spec No:S17-22 [PMID: 8072059]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0proteinbodyplant-basedwheysupplementationfutsalplayersmassdietarycompositionperformancepowerobservedeffectsessentialaminoacidprofilesourcespossessadditionalanabolicpropertiesnovelmatrixstrengthtrained8weekseither=20leanfatmuscleaminotransferasemaximalaerobicintakestudiedvariablesaffectProteinIntroduction:physicalseeminglydependgivensourcealthoughcontroversyexistswhetheranimalmayPurpose:compareenduranceMethods:Fiftymalefollowed40completingstudyfollowingmeasuresassessed:bonemineralcontentthicknessrectusfemoristotalwaterbloodglucosehematocritC-reactiveaspartatealaninecreatinekinasecreatinineestimatedglomerularfiltrationratesalivarycortisol1-RMtestingbacksquatbenchpressexercisescountermovementjumpVOspeedSubjectsaskedmaintainregularhabitsrecordevery43-dayfoodrecordsResults:differencesvariablegroupsbaselinepre-post-interventionMoreovertimegroupinteractiontimeeffectregardingreductionConclusions:Supplementingassessedhigh-levelwksresultssuggestuniqueproteinsequatedpopulationFurthermoreconsumingdaily>16g/kgBWdayregardlesstype/sourceNovelPlant-BasedSimilarEffectsComparedWheyBodyCompositionStrengthPowerAerobicPerformanceProfessionalSemi-ProfessionalFutsalPlayerscapacityathletes

Similar Articles

Cited By