Safety or service? Effects of employee prosocial safety-rule-breaking on consumer satisfaction.

Cass Shum, Ankita Ghosh
Author Information
  1. Cass Shum: William F. Harrah College of Hospitality, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4505 Maryland Parkway Box 456013, Las Vegas, NV 89154-6021, USA.
  2. Ankita Ghosh: William F. Harrah College of Hospitality, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4505 Maryland Parkway Box 456013, Las Vegas, NV 89154-6021, USA.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic makes restaurants implement new safety rules. However, because of consumers' and employees' resistance, employees may break these rules to improve the service experience. This paper examines how employees' prosocial safety-rule-breakings (PSRB) affect consumer satisfaction. We propose that PSRB has two competing effects on consumers' (including both requesters and bystanders) satisfaction via the mediating roles of service performance and perceived safety. We tested our proposed model in two experiments, adopting a 2 (Consumer role: Requesters vs. Bystanders) × 2 (PSRB level: Low vs. High) between-subject experimental design. Our findings suggest that PSRB has a strong negative relationship with bystanders' service performance rating. PSRB harms both requesters' and bystanders' perceived safety. PSRB reduces consumer satisfaction, and the relationship is stronger for bystanders (vs. requesters). This study demonstrates the importance for hospitality organizations to ensure safety rule compliance during and after the pandemic.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Jan;92:102702 [PMID: 33024347]
  2. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 May;95:102910 [PMID: 36540677]
  3. Tour Manag. 2021 Aug;85:104320 [PMID: 34815612]
  4. Psychiatry Res. 2019 Mar;273:1-8 [PMID: 30634110]
  5. J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903 [PMID: 14516251]
  6. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 May;95:102934 [PMID: 36540679]
  7. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Jan;92:102682 [PMID: 33071426]
  8. Int J Hosp Manag. 2020 Oct;91:102692 [PMID: 33012948]
  9. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 May;95:102894 [PMID: 36540680]
  10. Food Control. 2021 Mar;121:107617 [PMID: 33519101]
  11. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Jan;92:102662 [PMID: 32904503]
  12. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 May;95:102892 [PMID: 36540686]
  13. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;13(2):149-154 [PMID: 29928846]
  14. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Jun;51:102092 [PMID: 32315963]
  15. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 May;95:102906 [PMID: 36540688]
  16. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Jan;92:102752 [PMID: 33223596]
  17. Glob Transit. 2020;2:76-82 [PMID: 32835202]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PSRBsafetysatisfactionCOVID-19serviceprosocialconsumerperformancevspandemicrulesconsumers'employees'safety-rule-breakingstworequestersbystandersperceived2Consumerrelationshipbystanders'DiseasemakesrestaurantsimplementnewHoweverresistanceemployeesmaybreakimproveexperiencepaperexaminesaffectproposecompetingeffectsincludingviamediatingrolestestedproposedmodelexperimentsadoptingrole:RequestersBystanders×level:LowHighbetween-subjectexperimentaldesignfindingssuggeststrongnegativeratingharmsrequesters'reducesstrongerstudydemonstratesimportancehospitalityorganizationsensurerulecomplianceSafetyservice?Effectsemployeesafety-rule-breakingCDCCentersControlPreventionCoronavirus2019PerceivedProsocialrule-breakingService

Similar Articles

Cited By