How Can Physical Inactivity in Girls Be Explained? A Socioecological Study in Public, Subsidized, and Private Schools.

Rodrigo Soto-Lagos, Carolina Cortes-Varas, Solange Freire-Arancibia, María-Alejandra Energici, Brent McDonald
Author Information
  1. Rodrigo Soto-Lagos: Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Andres Bello University, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile. ORCID
  2. Carolina Cortes-Varas: Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Andres Bello University, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile. ORCID
  3. Solange Freire-Arancibia: Faculty of Education and Social Sciences, Andres Bello University, Viña del Mar 2520000, Chile. ORCID
  4. María-Alejandra Energici: Faculty of Psychology, Alberto Hurtado University, Santiago 9160000, Chile. ORCID
  5. Brent McDonald: Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC 3011, Australia. ORCID

Abstract

In the last few years, the World Health Organization has highlighted that physical inactivity is a global issue affecting women to a greater extent than men. Faced with this, different nation states have developed public policies to reduce physical inactivity at school; however, the biomedical and individualistic models used have generated widespread criticism, as figures remain the same. In the context of failed interventions on increasing levels of physical activity, this study utilizes a socioecological model to analyze and understand how physical inactivity is reproduced in girls in the Chilean education system. A qualitative study was implemented, as it allows a focus on the entailed meanings, context, and processes. Active semi-structured interviews were conducted with 40 groups comprising headmasters, teachers, non-teachers, students, and families. The results show that physical inactivity is linked to factors that go beyond the individualistic model; that is, consideration must include intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, community, and public policy dimensions. Furthermore, gender stereotypes gain relevance in physical education classes, in addition to friendships and family, teaching, and administrative work, access to safe play areas, use of spaces, and widespread cultural factors associated with men and women. This study concludes that the assessed gender differences should be approached from a pedagogical perspective beyond common sense, further reporting that the individualized explanation for physical inactivity is irrelevant to answer why women are more inactive than men.

Keywords

References

  1. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:297-322 [PMID: 16533119]
  2. Cien Saude Colet. 2010 Jun;15 Suppl 1:1699-708 [PMID: 20640331]
  3. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 18;18(6): [PMID: 33803733]
  4. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 23;19(7): [PMID: 35409498]
  5. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 23;19(5): [PMID: 35270251]
  6. Salud Colect. 2017 Jan-Mar;13(1):45-61 [PMID: 28562725]
  7. Cien Saude Colet. 2014 May;19(5):1523-32 [PMID: 24897217]
  8. Sports Med. 2018 Feb;48(2):481-489 [PMID: 28647914]
  9. BMC Public Health. 2022 Jan 8;22(1):52 [PMID: 34998379]
  10. Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):258-71 [PMID: 22818938]
  11. Lancet. 2012 Jul 21;380(9838):294-305 [PMID: 22818941]
  12. Health Educ Q. 1988 Winter;15(4):351-77 [PMID: 3068205]
  13. Front Sports Act Living. 2021 May 07;3:608593 [PMID: 34027402]
  14. Environ Health Prev Med. 2017 May 18;22(1):47 [PMID: 29165134]
  15. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 18;19(3): [PMID: 35162071]

MeSH Term

Exercise
Female
Humans
Male
Qualitative Research
Schools
Sedentary Behavior
Students

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0physicalinactivitywomenmenpublicstudymodeleducationgenderpoliciesindividualisticwidespreadcontextsocioecologicalgirlsfactorsbeyondlastyearsWorldHealthOrganizationhighlightedglobalissueaffectinggreaterextentFaceddifferentnationstatesdevelopedreduceschoolhoweverbiomedicalmodelsusedgeneratedcriticismfiguresremainfailedinterventionsincreasinglevelsactivityutilizesanalyzeunderstandreproducedChileansystemqualitativeimplementedallowsfocusentailedmeaningsprocessesActivesemi-structuredinterviewsconducted40groupscomprisingheadmastersteachersnon-teachersstudentsfamiliesresultsshowlinkedgoconsiderationmustincludeintrapersonalinterpersonalorganizationalcommunitypolicydimensionsFurthermorestereotypesgainrelevanceclassesadditionfriendshipsfamilyteachingadministrativeworkaccesssafeplayareasusespacesculturalassociatedconcludesassesseddifferencesapproachedpedagogicalperspectivecommonsensereportingindividualizedexplanationirrelevantanswerinactiveCanPhysicalInactivityGirlsExplained?SocioecologicalStudyPublicSubsidizedPrivateSchoolsactivities

Similar Articles

Cited By