Relative Validity of Food Intake in Each Meal Type and Overall Food Intake Derived Using the Meal-Based Diet History Questionnaire against the 4-Day Weighed Dietary Record in Japanese Adults.

Kentaro Murakami, Nana Shinozaki, Nana Kimoto, Shizuko Masayasu, Satoshi Sasaki
Author Information
  1. Kentaro Murakami: Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan. ORCID
  2. Nana Shinozaki: Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
  3. Nana Kimoto: Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
  4. Shizuko Masayasu: Ikurien-Naka, Ibaraki 311-0105, Japan.
  5. Satoshi Sasaki: Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.

Abstract

We examined the relative validity of food intake for each meal type (breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks) and overall food intake obtained through the Meal-based Diet History Questionnaire (MDHQ). In total, 222 Japanese adults (111 for each sex) aged 30-76 years completed the web version of the MDHQ and then the 4-non-consecutive-day weighed dietary record (DR). The number of major food groups ( = 24 in total) for which no statistically significant difference was observed between median intakes estimated using the DR and MDHQ ranged from 8 (snacks) to 12 (dinner) among women, and from 8 (breakfast) to 13 (lunch) among men. The median values of the Spearman's correlation coefficients between the MDHQ and DR estimates ranged from 0.28 (dinner) to 0.54 (breakfast) among women, and from 0.24 (dinner) and 0.60 (breakfast) among men. Bland-Altman analyses generally showed wide limits of agreement and proportional bias. Similar results were obtained using the paper version of the MDHQ, which was completed after conducting the DR. In conclusion, the MDHQ has a satisfactory ability to estimate median intake and rank individuals according to consumption for many food groups, despite a limited ability to estimate food group intakes on an individual level.

Keywords

References

  1. J Epidemiol. 2002 Mar;12(2):85-92 [PMID: 12033533]
  2. Public Health Nutr. 2011 Feb;14(2):297-305 [PMID: 20537215]
  3. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jul;106(1):113-124 [PMID: 28515070]
  4. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):750-8 [PMID: 27199309]
  5. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Aug 1;142(3):353-62 [PMID: 7631639]
  6. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2010 Jun;57(6):475-85 [PMID: 20718205]
  7. Public Health Nutr. 2011 Jul;14(7):1200-11 [PMID: 21477414]
  8. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 May;37(5):725-31 [PMID: 22777542]
  9. Public Health Nutr. 2022 Mar;25(3):689-701 [PMID: 33168120]
  10. Adv Nutr. 2021 Jul 30;12(4):1365-1378 [PMID: 33460431]
  11. J Epidemiol. 2012;22(2):151-9 [PMID: 22343326]
  12. J Nutr. 2003 Feb;133(2):510-5 [PMID: 12566492]
  13. Environ Health Prev Med. 2021 Mar 2;26(1):28 [PMID: 33653279]
  14. Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1958-1972 [PMID: 30954305]
  15. Br J Nutr. 2021 Oct 14;126(7):1056-1064 [PMID: 33298210]
  16. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999 Jun;8(2):135-60 [PMID: 10501650]
  17. Public Health Nutr. 2015 Aug;18(11):2011-21 [PMID: 25384694]
  18. Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):276-282 [PMID: 27976605]
  19. Public Health Nutr. 2010 Jul;13(7):1080-9 [PMID: 20074397]
  20. J Nutr. 2017 Nov;147(11):2093-2101 [PMID: 28904121]
  21. J Nutr Sci. 2018 Nov 13;7:e29 [PMID: 30459946]
  22. Nutrients. 2019 Oct 21;11(10): [PMID: 31640242]
  23. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 24;9(9):e108467 [PMID: 25250617]
  24. Public Health Nutr. 2016 Aug;19(11):2011-23 [PMID: 26573337]
  25. Proc Nutr Soc. 2016 Nov;75(4):487-500 [PMID: 27327252]
  26. Nutrients. 2021 Sep 27;13(10): [PMID: 34684392]
  27. Public Health Nutr. 2022 Jun;25(6):1515-1527 [PMID: 33663632]
  28. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002 Feb;13(1):3-9 [PMID: 11790957]
  29. Nutr Res Rev. 2015 Jun;28(1):1-21 [PMID: 25790334]
  30. Br J Nutr. 2017 Jul;118(1):53-59 [PMID: 28799894]
  31. Public Health Nutr. 2002 Aug;5(4):567-87 [PMID: 12186666]
  32. Nutrients. 2020 Jan 26;12(2): [PMID: 31991922]
  33. J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug 5;26(8):420-32 [PMID: 27064130]
  34. J Epidemiol. 2009;19(1):1-11 [PMID: 19164867]
  35. Public Health Nutr. 2007 Mar;10(3):245-51 [PMID: 17288621]
  36. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Sep;78(3 Suppl):508S-513S [PMID: 12936941]
  37. Br J Nutr. 2008 Mar;99(3):639-48 [PMID: 17764595]
  38. Nutrition. 2019 Mar;59:108-115 [PMID: 30471523]
  39. Adv Nutr. 2019 Jan 1;10(1):30-42 [PMID: 30500869]

Grants

  1. Not available/Institute for Food and Health Science, Yazuya Co. Ltd

MeSH Term

Adult
Diet
Diet Records
Eating
Energy Intake
Feeding Behavior
Female
Humans
Japan
Male
Meals
Surveys and Questionnaires

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foodMDHQbreakfastdinnerDRamong0intakemedianvaliditymeallunchsnacksobtainedDietHistoryQuestionnairetotalJapanesecompletedversiondietaryrecordgroups24intakesusingranged8womenmenabilityestimateFoodIntakeexaminedrelativetypeoverallMeal-based222adults111sexaged30-76yearsweb4-non-consecutive-dayweighednumbermajor=statisticallysignificantdifferenceobservedestimated1213valuesSpearman'scorrelationcoefficientsestimates285460Bland-AltmananalysesgenerallyshowedwidelimitsagreementproportionalbiasSimilarresultspaperconductingconclusionsatisfactoryrankindividualsaccordingconsumptionmanydespitelimitedgroupindividuallevelRelativeValidityMealTypeOverallDerivedUsingMeal-Based4-DayWeighedDietaryRecordAdultsJapandietquestionnairesnack

Similar Articles

Cited By