Moving towards patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical practice: implementation lessons from the BREAST-Q.

Jonas A Nelson, Jacqueline J Chu, Stefan Dabic, Elizabeth O Kenworthy, Meghana G Shamsunder, Colleen M McCarthy, Babak J Mehrara, Andrea L Pusic
Author Information
  1. Jonas A Nelson: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 321 E 61st St,, New York, NY, 10065, USA. Nelsonj1@mskcc.org.
  2. Jacqueline J Chu: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 321 E 61st St,, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
  3. Stefan Dabic: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 321 E 61st St,, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
  4. Elizabeth O Kenworthy: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 321 E 61st St,, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
  5. Meghana G Shamsunder: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 321 E 61st St,, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
  6. Colleen M McCarthy: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 321 E 61st St,, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
  7. Babak J Mehrara: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 321 E 61st St,, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
  8. Andrea L Pusic: Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Longitudinal, routine utilization of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical care has been challenging. The purpose of this study is to describe a quality improvement initiative to improve patient engagement with the BREAST-Q, a gold-standard PROM for breast reconstruction.
METHODS: In 2011, we implemented the BREAST-Q as part of routine care. In 2018, we began a quality improvement initiative to increase BREAST-Q patient participation. The BREAST-Q was administered at every clinic visit via an institutional patient portal or an in-clinic tablet; digital dashboard technologies were used to improve workflow integration, real-time accountability, and immediate data availability at clinic visits. High clinical staff engagement was encouraged by assigning "BREAST-Q Champions." BREAST-Q completion data and patient characteristics were examined to understand non-response to the assessment.
RESULTS: Following quality improvement, the average annual BREAST-Q completion rate increased from 42.8% in 2011-2017 to 87.6% in 2019, the last full year of our study period. High completion rates were maintained January-July 2020; however, a significantly larger proportion of BREAST-Qs were completed at home in 2020 versus the same period in 2019 (49.7 vs. 38.8%, p < 0.001), potentially due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared with non-responders, responders were younger (49.7 vs. 52.2 years, p < 0.001), more likely to be white (76.9 vs. 73.6%, p < 0.001), and had private insurance (79.4 vs. 69.8%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Our quality improvement initiative successfully increased routine completion of the BREAST-Q. Similar implementation techniques may prove beneficial at other institutions interested in incorporating PROMs into routine care.

Keywords

References

  1. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Feb;69(2):149-62 [PMID: 26740288]
  2. JAMA Surg. 2018 Oct 1;153(10):891-899 [PMID: 29926096]
  3. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jul;93(7):867-75 [PMID: 21705555]
  4. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Apr;23(4):290-8 [PMID: 24025320]
  5. Value Health. 2017 Jun;20(6):834-836 [PMID: 28577702]
  6. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 10;31(20):2580-5 [PMID: 23733753]
  7. J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(Suppl 7):S976-S986 [PMID: 31183180]
  8. Qual Life Res. 2015 Jul;24(7):1707-18 [PMID: 25589231]
  9. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Nov;16(11):e1255-e1263 [PMID: 32926662]
  10. Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Apr;35(4):575-82 [PMID: 27044954]
  11. SAGE Open Med. 2018 Aug 01;6:2050312118792426 [PMID: 30083320]
  12. Clin Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;40(2):287-96 [PMID: 23506769]
  13. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Nov;127(2):273-7 [PMID: 22871467]
  14. Arthroscopy. 2017 Nov;33(11):1940-1946 [PMID: 28958797]
  15. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jan 21;9(2):e013047 [PMID: 31937195]
  16. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Apr;143(4):1010-1017 [PMID: 30921114]
  17. Qual Life Res. 2012 Oct;21(8):1305-14 [PMID: 22048932]
  18. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jul;134(1):173e-175e [PMID: 25028843]
  19. BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 6;10(8):e030808 [PMID: 32764078]
  20. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Feb;129(2):293-302 [PMID: 22286412]
  21. Implement Sci. 2020 Aug 6;15(1):62 [PMID: 32762726]
  22. JAMA Oncol. 2017 May 1;3(5):677-685 [PMID: 28033439]
  23. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Feb;16(1):2-3 [PMID: 17301192]
  24. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb 20;34(6):557-65 [PMID: 26644527]
  25. Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Jul 12;39(8):NP322-NP330 [PMID: 30874722]
  26. Implement Sci. 2019 Dec 23;14(1):110 [PMID: 31870453]
  27. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;14(12):763-772 [PMID: 28975931]
  28. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:122-134 [PMID: 30231381]
  29. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 May;28(5):356-365 [PMID: 30886118]
  30. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2015 Sep;22(2-3):160-8 [PMID: 26123551]
  31. SAGE Open Med. 2018 May 17;6:2050312118773261 [PMID: 29796266]
  32. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Feb;25 Suppl 1:S48-S50 [PMID: 27941415]
  33. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Jun 3;3(1):31 [PMID: 31155689]
  34. JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):197-198 [PMID: 28586821]
  35. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Aug 07;6(8):e1904 [PMID: 30254830]
  36. Breast. 2017 Jun;33:44-49 [PMID: 28279888]
  37. Ann Surg. 2019 Sep;270(3):473-483 [PMID: 31356276]
  38. Value Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):316-21 [PMID: 21402299]
  39. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 1;30(34):4249-55 [PMID: 23071244]
  40. Value Health. 2019 Oct;22(10):1197-1226 [PMID: 31563263]
  41. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):345-353 [PMID: 19644246]

Grants

  1. P30 CA008748/NCI NIH HHS
  2. P30CA008748/NCI NIH HHS
  3. P30CA008748/NCI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Pandemics
Quality of Life
COVID-19
Mammaplasty
Patient Reported Outcome Measures

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BREAST-Qroutinequalityimprovementpatientcompletionvsp < 0001clinicalcareinitiative8%patient-reportedoutcomemeasuresPROMsstudyimproveengagementclinicdataHighrateincreased6%2019period2020497implementationPURPOSE:Longitudinalutilizationchallengingpurposedescribegold-standardPROMbreastreconstructionMETHODS:2011implementedpart2018beganincreaseparticipationadministeredeveryvisitviainstitutionalportalin-clinictabletdigitaldashboardtechnologiesusedworkflowintegrationreal-timeaccountabilityimmediateavailabilityvisitsstaffencouragedassigning"BREAST-QChampions"characteristicsexaminedunderstandnon-responseassessmentRESULTS:Followingaverageannual422011-201787lastfullyearratesmaintainedJanuary-JulyhoweversignificantlylargerproportionBREAST-Qscompletedhomeversus38potentiallydueCOVID-19pandemicComparednon-respondersrespondersyounger522 yearslikelywhite76973privateinsurance79469CONCLUSION:successfullySimilartechniquesmayprovebeneficialinstitutionsinterestedincorporatingMovingtowardsoutcomespractice:lessonsClinicalpracticeNon-responderPatient-reportedResponse

Similar Articles

Cited By