Association of Physician Group Practice Participation in Bundled Payments With Patient Selection, Costs, and Outcomes for Joint Replacement.

Karen E Joynt Maddox, E John Orav, Jie Zheng, Arnold M Epstein
Author Information
  1. Karen E Joynt Maddox: Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
  2. E John Orav: Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
  3. Jie Zheng: Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
  4. Arnold M Epstein: Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Abstract

Importance: Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) program, which ran from 2013 to 2018, was an important experiment in physician-focused alternative payment models. However, little is known about whether the program was associated with better quality or outcomes or lower costs.
Objective: To determine whether participation in BPCI among physician group practices was associated with advantageous or deleterious changes in costs or patient outcomes.
Design Setting and Participants: This cross-sectional study used 2013 to 2017 Medicare files and difference-in-differences (DID) models to compare the change over time in Medicare payments, patient selection, and clinical outcomes between 91 orthopedic groups in BPCI Model 2 and 169 propensity-matched controls for patients undergoing joint replacement. Analyses were performed between December 2019 and February 2021.
Exposures: Voluntary participation in BPCI.
Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 90-day Medicare payments; secondary outcomes were patient selection (volume, comorbidities) and clinical outcomes (30-day and 90-day emergency department visits, readmissions, mortality, and healthy days at home).
Results: There were 74 343 patient episodes in the baseline period and 102 790 during the intervention in BPCI practices, and 88 147 patient episodes in the baseline period and 120 253 during the intervention in control practices; 291 214 of 461 598 (63.1%) patients were women, and 419 619 (90.9%) were White. At baseline, mean episode payments among BPCI-participating practices were $18 257, which decreased to $15 320 during the intervention, while control practices decreased from $17 927 to $16 170 (DID, -$1180; 95% CI, -$1565 to -$795;  < .001). Savings were driven by a decrease in postacute care spending. There were no differential changes in volume or comorbidities. The BPCI practices increased the proportion of patients discharged home compared with controls (23.6% to 43.4% vs 22.2% to 31.8%; DID, 10.2% [95% CI, 6.2% to 14.1%]). There were no differential changes in 30-day or 90-day mortality rates or emergency department visits, but 30-day and 90-day readmission rates decreased more among BPCI practices than controls (90 days: 8.7% to 7.5% vs 8.9% to 8.7%; DID, -1.0% [95% CI, -1.4% to -0.5%]), and 90-day healthy days at home increased (BPCI, 82.9 to 84.8, vs controls, 83.1 to 84.4; DID, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.4 to 0.8]).
Conclusions and Relevance: Group practice participation in BPCI for joint replacement was associated with reduced Medicare payments and improvements in clinical outcomes.

References

  1. N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):759-764 [PMID: 33440085]
  2. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Feb;31(2):343-50 [PMID: 26427938]
  3. JAMA. 2018 Sep 4;320(9):901-910 [PMID: 30193276]
  4. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):214-222 [PMID: 28055062]
  5. JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1267-78 [PMID: 27653006]
  6. JAMA. 2020 Nov 10;324(18):1869-1877 [PMID: 33170241]
  7. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 May;67(5):1027-1035 [PMID: 30802938]
  8. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Dec 7;98(23):1949-1953 [PMID: 27926675]
  9. N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 20;379(12):1139-1149 [PMID: 30183495]

Grants

  1. R01 HL143421/NHLBI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Aged
Arthroplasty, Replacement
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Group Practice
Hospitals
Humans
Male
Medicare
Patient Selection
Physicians
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0BPCIpracticesoutcomespatientDID90-dayMedicarepaymentscontrolsCI8associatedparticipationamongchangesclinicalpatients30-dayhomebaselineinterventiondecreasedvs2%[95%0BundledPaymentsprogram2013modelswhethercostsselectionjointreplacementOutcomesvolumecomorbiditiesemergencydepartmentvisitsmortalityhealthydaysepisodesperiodcontrol909%differentialincreased4%6rates7%-1844GroupImportance:Medicare'sCareImprovementran2018importantexperimentphysician-focusedalternativepaymentHoweverlittleknownbetterqualitylowerObjective:determinephysiciangroupadvantageousdeleteriousDesignSettingParticipants:cross-sectionalstudyused2017filesdifference-in-differencescomparechangetime91orthopedicgroupsModel2169propensity-matchedundergoingAnalysesperformedDecember2019February2021Exposures:VoluntaryMainMeasures:primaryoutcomesecondaryreadmissionsResults:74 343102 79088 147120 253291 214461 598631%women419 619WhitemeanepisodeBPCI-participating$18 257$15 320$17 927$16 170-$118095%-$1565-$795<001Savingsdrivendecreasepostacutecarespendingproportiondischargedcompared236%4322318%10141%]readmissiondays:75%0%-05%]8298318]ConclusionsRelevance:practicereducedimprovementsAssociationPhysicianPracticeParticipationPatientSelectionCostsJointReplacement

Similar Articles

Cited By