The brain dynamics of trust decisions and outcome evaluation in narcissists.

Fengbo Guo, Ziyang Yang, Tengfei Liu, Li Gu
Author Information
  1. Fengbo Guo: Key Laboratory for Quality of Life and Psychological Assessment and Intervention, School of Humanities and Management, Research Center for Quality of Life and Applied Psychology, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China.
  2. Ziyang Yang: Key Laboratory for Quality of Life and Psychological Assessment and Intervention, School of Humanities and Management, Research Center for Quality of Life and Applied Psychology, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China.
  3. Tengfei Liu: Key Laboratory for Quality of Life and Psychological Assessment and Intervention, School of Humanities and Management, Research Center for Quality of Life and Applied Psychology, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China.
  4. Li Gu: Key Laboratory for Quality of Life and Psychological Assessment and Intervention, School of Humanities and Management, Research Center for Quality of Life and Applied Psychology, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China.

Abstract

Individuals with narcissism are, by definition, self-centered, focus on self-benefit, and demonstrate less prosocial behaviors. Trusting strangers is risky, as it can result in exploitation and non-reciprocation. Thus, the trust may be antagonistic to narcissism. However, how narcissists make the choice to trust remains to be elucidated. The current study examined 44 participants (22 rated high in narcissism) playing as trustors in one-shot trust games, and their electroencephalograms were recorded. Individuals high in narcissism exhibited less trust toward strangers, especially following gaining feedback for their trust. In addition, narcissists exhibited a larger N2 following distrust and a stronger negatively-valanced difference in feedback-related negativity (dFRN) after trustee feedback. Our findings provide insights into how individuals with narcissism trust strangers. The results also shed light on the temporal course of brain activity involved in trust decision-making and outcome evaluation in individuals with narcissism.

Keywords

References

  1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Jan;98(1):132-45 [PMID: 20053038]
  2. Neuroimage. 2014 Aug 1;96:12-21 [PMID: 24718288]
  3. J Pers. 2008 Jun;76(3):449-76 [PMID: 18399956]
  4. J Pers. 2019 Dec;87(6):1151-1169 [PMID: 30742713]
  5. Aggress Behav. 2010 Jan-Feb;36(1):21-7 [PMID: 19918915]
  6. Psychol Bull. 2005 Jul;131(4):510-32 [PMID: 16060800]
  7. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 8;13:291-315 [PMID: 28301765]
  8. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2016 Oct;11(10):1666-76 [PMID: 27317927]
  9. Psychol Assess. 2015 Dec;27(4):1520-6 [PMID: 26011478]
  10. Psychol Rev. 2002 Oct;109(4):679-709 [PMID: 12374324]
  11. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(2):448-55 [PMID: 19822163]
  12. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2018 Feb;22(1):3-31 [PMID: 28132598]
  13. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Jan;139(1):7-18 [PMID: 22036588]
  14. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Feb;16(2):122-8 [PMID: 22226543]
  15. Psychol Rep. 1979 Oct;45(2):590 [PMID: 538183]
  16. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015 May;108(5):784-801 [PMID: 25545840]
  17. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Dec;32(12):2207-16 [PMID: 21305664]
  18. Neurosci Lett. 2012 May 31;517(2):65-70 [PMID: 22410307]
  19. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Jan;15(1):150-172 [PMID: 31805811]
  20. Psychol Bull. 2015 Jan;141(1):213-35 [PMID: 25495239]
  21. Psychol Bull. 2012 Jul;138(4):692-743 [PMID: 22506751]
  22. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016 Apr;37:36-43 [PMID: 26774693]
  23. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39627 [PMID: 22761850]
  24. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018 Feb;18(1):99-116 [PMID: 29204798]
  25. Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):931-959 [PMID: 15482068]
  26. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Mar;87(3):217-33 [PMID: 22906815]
  27. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Aug;146(8):1150-1163 [PMID: 28569521]
  28. J Pers Disord. 2017 Jun;31(3):325-345 [PMID: 27322580]
  29. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jul;34(7):1004-17 [PMID: 18436654]
  30. Science. 2002 Mar 22;295(5563):2279-82 [PMID: 11910116]
  31. Psychophysiology. 2008 Jan;45(1):152-70 [PMID: 17850238]
  32. Psychol Assess. 2009 Sep;21(3):365-379 [PMID: 19719348]
  33. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Jul 1;21(8):69 [PMID: 31264030]
  34. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Dec;91(6):1123-37 [PMID: 17144769]
  35. J Pers Assess. 2004 Aug;83(1):29-45 [PMID: 15271594]
  36. Neuroscience. 2016 Jul 22;328:50-7 [PMID: 27129440]
  37. Brain Res. 2009 Aug 25;1286:114-22 [PMID: 19539614]
  38. Psychophysiology. 2011 Apr;48(4):515-22 [PMID: 20701711]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trustnarcissismstrangersnarcissistsIndividualslesshighexhibitedfollowingfeedbackN2individualsbrainoutcomeevaluationdefinitionself-centeredfocusself-benefitdemonstrateprosocialbehaviorsTrustingriskycanresultexploitationnon-reciprocationThusmayantagonisticHowevermakechoiceremainselucidatedcurrentstudyexamined44participants22ratedplayingtrustorsone-shotgameselectroencephalogramsrecordedtowardespeciallygainingadditionlargerdistruststrongernegatively-valanceddifferencefeedback-relatednegativitydFRNtrusteefindingsprovideinsightsresultsalsoshedlighttemporalcourseactivityinvolveddecision-makingdynamicsdecisionsFRNevent-relatedpotentialsERP

Similar Articles

Cited By