Considering medical students' perception, concerns and needs for e-exam during COVID-19: a promising approach to improve subject specific e-exams.

Stefanie Ziehfreund, Johannes Reifenrath, Marjo Wijnen-Meijer, Julia Welzel, Fabian Sauter, Hannah Wecker, Tilo Biedermann, Alexander Zink
Author Information
  1. Stefanie Ziehfreund: Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany. ORCID
  2. Johannes Reifenrath: School of Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center (TUM MEC), Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  3. Marjo Wijnen-Meijer: School of Medicine, TUM Medical Education Center (TUM MEC), Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  4. Julia Welzel: Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
  5. Fabian Sauter: Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
  6. Hannah Wecker: Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
  7. Tilo Biedermann: Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
  8. Alexander Zink: Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic forced a rapid shift to digital strategies including e-exams in medical schools. However, there are significant concerns, predominately from student perspectives, and further data is required to successfully establish e-assessment in the medical curricula. The objective of the study was to examine medical students' perceptions, concerns, and needs regarding e-assessment to establish a comprehensive e-exam based on these and previous findings and to evaluate its effectiveness in terms of examinee perceptions and further needs. During the 2021 summer term, a cross-sectional study using qualitative and quantitative methods was conducted among all 1077 students at the School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich. They were asked to provide information regarding their characteristics, preferred exam format, e-assessment perception, concerns, and needs in an online questionnaire. Based on these findings, a pilot e-exam including an e-exam preparation for the students were established and subsequently evaluated among 125 pilot e-exam examinees under study consideration via an online-questionnaire. Of the 317 pre-exam participants (73.2% female), 70.3% preferred in-person exams and showed concerns about the technological framework, privacy, and examination requirements. Qualitative analysis showed that these concerns lead to additional exam stress and fear of failure. The 34 (79.4% female) participants who participated in the evaluation survey showed a significantly more positive e-exam perception. The fairness of the platform, the independence from an internet connection, the organization including the e-exam preparation, and the consideration of participant needs were discussed as particularly positive in the open-ended comments. In both surveys, participants requested uniform platforms and processes for all subjects. This study provides evidence for a positive, complementary role of student participation in a successful e-exam implementation. Furthermore, when establishing an e-exam format in the medical curricula, e-exam training, equal accessibility, availability offline, and all-round fairness should be considered.

Keywords

References

  1. JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2131-2132 [PMID: 32232420]
  2. J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Aug;12(4):403-405 [PMID: 32879676]
  3. Med Teach. 2021 Aug;43(8):972-973 [PMID: 32857626]
  4. Med Educ Online. 2019 Dec;24(1):1649959 [PMID: 31438809]
  5. JMIR Med Educ. 2021 Nov 17;7(4):e30533 [PMID: 34787589]
  6. J Laryngol Otol. 2021 Apr;135(4):288-292 [PMID: 33413724]
  7. Clin Teach. 2021 Jun;18(3):236-242 [PMID: 33063427]
  8. BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):206 [PMID: 32600460]
  9. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Feb;10(2):235-242 [PMID: 29706282]
  10. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022 Jan 11;13:27-33 [PMID: 35046745]
  11. BMC Med Educ. 2020 May 6;20(1):141 [PMID: 32375739]
  12. Med Educ Online. 2020 Dec;25(1):1826861 [PMID: 33000704]
  13. Comput Educ. 2020 Dec;159:104024 [PMID: 32982023]
  14. Philos Technol. 2021;34(4):1581-1606 [PMID: 34485025]
  15. Bone Jt Open. 2021 Feb;2(2):111-118 [PMID: 33595343]
  16. Med Teach. 2020 Jul;42(7):830-831 [PMID: 32432953]
  17. BMC Med Educ. 2021 Feb 2;21(1):86 [PMID: 33530962]
  18. Med Teach. 2019 Dec;41(12):1366-1371 [PMID: 31314621]
  19. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2020 Oct;18(10):1178-1180 [PMID: 32975010]
  20. Acad Med. 2016 Apr;91(4):583-99 [PMID: 26535862]
  21. Med Teach. 2019 Oct;41(10):1203-1205 [PMID: 31131654]
  22. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Feb;62:326-333 [PMID: 33520225]
  23. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Dec;60:271-279 [PMID: 33163179]

MeSH Term

COVID-19
Cross-Sectional Studies
Curriculum
Female
Humans
Male
Pandemics
Perception
Students, Medical

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0e-exammedicalconcernsneedse-assessmentstudyincludingstudentsperceptionparticipantsshowedpositivee-examsstudentestablishcurriculastudents'perceptionsregardingfindingsamongpreferredexamformatpilotpreparationconsiderationfemalefairnessCOVID-19pandemicforcedrapidshiftdigitalstrategiesschoolsHoweversignificantpredominatelyperspectivesdatarequiredsuccessfullyobjectiveexaminecomprehensivebasedpreviousevaluateeffectivenesstermsexaminee2021summertermcross-sectionalusingqualitativequantitativemethodsconducted1077SchoolMedicineTechnicalUniversityMunichaskedprovideinformationcharacteristicsonlinequestionnaireBasedestablishedsubsequentlyevaluated125examineesviaonline-questionnaire317pre-exam732%703%in-personexamstechnologicalframeworkprivacyexaminationrequirementsQualitativeanalysisleadadditionalstressfearfailure34794%participatedevaluationsurveysignificantlyplatformindependenceinternetconnectionorganizationparticipantdiscussedparticularlyopen-endedcommentssurveysrequesteduniformplatformsprocessessubjectsprovidesevidencecomplementaryroleparticipationsuccessfulimplementationFurthermoreestablishingtrainingequalaccessibilityavailabilityofflineall-roundconsideredConsideringCOVID-19:promisingapproachimprovesubjectspecificcurriculume-learning

Similar Articles

Cited By