Full-length standing radiographs can be used for determination of the Femoral neck-shaft angle but not acetabular coverage.

Sufian S Ahmad, Christian Konrads, Annika Steinmeier, Max Ettinger, Henning Windhagen, Gregor M Giebel
Author Information
  1. Sufian S Ahmad: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany - Faculty of Medicine, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
  2. Christian Konrads: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. ORCID
  3. Annika Steinmeier: Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medical Center, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
  4. Max Ettinger: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
  5. Henning Windhagen: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
  6. Gregor M Giebel: Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medical Center, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The exact evaluation of hip morphology is essential for surgical planning. A wide range of morphometric measures of the acetabulum is deduced from conventional anterior-posterior (ap) pelvic radiographs. Full-length weight-bearing radiographs (FLWBR) also depict the acetabulum and are commonly used for osteotomy planning of the lower limb. This study aimed to determine whether FLWBR can be used to evaluate acetabular morphology.
METHODS: Radiographs of patients receiving a hip workup that included a conventional ap pelvic X-ray and FLWBR were utilized for radiographic measurements. The following parameters were measured: extrusion index of the femoral head, anterior wall index, posterior wall index, lateral center edge angle (LCE), acetabular index, pubic arc angle (subpubic angle), and centrum-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD).
RESULTS: FLWBR depicted a significantly reduced anterior coverage (p = 0.049) and increased posterior coverage (p < 0.001), higher acetabular index (p = 0.015), and higher pubic-arc angle (p = 0.02) compared to conventional ap pelvic radiographs. There were no significant differences regarding the CCD angle (p = 0.28), extrusion index (p = 0.31), and LCE (p = 0.16).
DISCUSSION: The CCD angle of the femur can be measured on conventional ap radiographs and full-length weight-bearing X-rays for lower limb deformity analysis. However, FLWBR will depict an anteverted acetabular morphology, rendering conventional ap radiographs necessary for planning pelvic osteotomies.

Keywords

References

  1. Orthopade. 2016 Aug;45(8):687-94 [PMID: 27250618]
  2. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Jan;(418):67-73 [PMID: 15043095]
  3. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Jun;188(6):1540-52 [PMID: 17515374]
  4. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 May;73(3):423-9 [PMID: 1670443]
  5. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979 Jan;61(1):15-23 [PMID: 365863]
  6. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1333-41 [PMID: 25367110]
  7. Hip Int. 2021 Sep 27;:11207000211048425 [PMID: 34569355]
  8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Apr;466(4):809-12 [PMID: 18288555]
  9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Jun;(363):9-20 [PMID: 10379300]
  10. Knee. 2013 Aug;20(4):242-9 [PMID: 22892197]
  11. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Aug;29(8):2446-2452 [PMID: 33950346]
  12. Bone Jt Open. 2021 Dec;2(12):1057-1061 [PMID: 34905937]
  13. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Apr;473(4):1234-46 [PMID: 25384429]
  14. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Mar;81(2):281-8 [PMID: 10204935]
  15. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Apr;475(4):1138-1150 [PMID: 27921206]
  16. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1692-6 [PMID: 26913511]
  17. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2016 Nov 10;3(4):245-261 [PMID: 29632685]
  18. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Jul;466(7):1633-44 [PMID: 18449617]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0angleapradiographsindexp = 0conventionalpelvicFLWBRacetabularmorphologyplanningFull-lengthweight-bearingusedosteotomycanCCDcoveragehipacetabulumdepictlowerlimbX-rayextrusionanteriorwallposteriorLCEhigherfemurINTRODUCTION:exactevaluationessentialsurgicalwiderangemorphometricmeasuresdeducedanterior-posterioralsocommonlystudyaimeddeterminewhetherevaluateMETHODS:Radiographspatientsreceivingworkupincludedutilizedradiographicmeasurementsfollowingparametersmeasured:femoralheadlateralcenteredgepubicarcsubpubiccentrum-collum-diaphysealRESULTS:depictedsignificantlyreduced049increasedp < 0001015pubic-arc02comparedsignificantdifferencesregarding283116DISCUSSION:measuredfull-lengthX-raysdeformityanalysisHoweverwillantevertedrenderingnecessaryosteotomiesstandingdeterminationFemoralneck-shaftConventionalradiographDistalFemoroacetabularimpingementHightibialHipdysplasiaOsteotomy

Similar Articles

Cited By