Functional Connectivity within the Frontal-Striatal Network Differentiates Checkers from Washers of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Jianping Yu, Minyao Xie, Shasha Song, Ping Zhou, Fangzheng Yuan, Mengyuan Ouyang, Chun Wang, Na Liu, Ning Zhang
Author Information
  1. Jianping Yu: The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 264 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210029, China.
  2. Minyao Xie: The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 264 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210029, China.
  3. Shasha Song: The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 264 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210029, China.
  4. Ping Zhou: Department of Medical Psychology, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 264 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210029, China.
  5. Fangzheng Yuan: School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, 122 Ninghai Road, Nanjing 210024, China.
  6. Mengyuan Ouyang: The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 264 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210029, China.
  7. Chun Wang: The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 264 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210029, China.
  8. Na Liu: Department of Medical Psychology, The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 264 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210029, China. ORCID
  9. Ning Zhang: The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 264 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210029, China.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a psychiatric disorder with high clinical heterogeneity manifested by the presence of obsessions and/or compulsions. The classification of the symptom dimensional subtypes is helpful for further exploration of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the clinical heterogeneity of OCD. Washing and checking symptoms are the two major symptom subtypes in OCD, but the neural mechanisms of the different types of symptoms are not yet clearly understood. The purpose of this study was to compare regional and network functional alterations between washing and checking OCD based on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI).
METHODS: In total, 90 subjects were included, including 15 patients in the washing group, 30 patients in the checking group, and 45 healthy controls (HCs). Regional homogeneity (ReHo) was used to compare the differences in regional spontaneous neural activity among the three groups, and local indicators were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves as imaging markers for the prediction of the clinical subtypes of OCD. Furthermore, differently activated local brain areas, as regions of interest (ROIs), were used to explore differences in altered brain functioning between washing and checking OCD symptoms based on a functional connectivity (FC) analysis.
RESULTS: Extensive abnormalities in spontaneous brain activity involving frontal, temporal, and occipital regions were observed in the patients compared to the HCs. The differences in local brain functioning between checking and washing OCD were mainly concentrated in the bilateral middle frontal gyrus, right supramarginal gyrus, right angular gyrus, and right inferior occipital gyrus. The ROC curve analysis revealed that the hyperactivation right middle frontal gyrus had a better discriminatory value for checking and washing OCD. Furthermore, the seed-based FC analysis revealed higher FC between the left medial superior frontal gyrus and right caudate nucleus compared to that in the healthy controls.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that extensive local differences exist in intrinsic spontaneous activity among the checking group, washing group, and HCs. The neural basis of checking OCD may be related to dysfunction in the frontal-striatal network, which distinguishes OCD from washing OCD.

Keywords

References

  1. J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Mar;25(2):293-301 [PMID: 21242055]
  2. Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 8;10(1):342 [PMID: 33033241]
  3. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2022 Jun;82(4):295-302 [PMID: 35274372]
  4. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2017 Jun;29(3):179-190 [PMID: 27772535]
  5. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Mar 15;53(6):482-93 [PMID: 12644353]
  6. East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2019 Dec;29(4):103-111 [PMID: 31871306]
  7. J Affect Disord. 2013 Dec;151(3):868-74 [PMID: 24041716]
  8. Lancet. 2009 Aug 8;374(9688):491-9 [PMID: 19665647]
  9. Rev Prat. 2020 Sep;70(7):783-787 [PMID: 33739729]
  10. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36356 [PMID: 22570705]
  11. J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Feb;146:125-134 [PMID: 34971910]
  12. Behav Res Ther. 2017 Jun;93:78-87 [PMID: 28391115]
  13. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2017 Sep;42(5):300-306 [PMID: 28375077]
  14. Psychol Med. 2020 Jan 30;:1-9 [PMID: 31997729]
  15. J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 01;207:203-211 [PMID: 27723545]
  16. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021 Mar;75(3):101-107 [PMID: 33368824]
  17. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S467-72 [PMID: 22588767]
  18. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Nov 26;13:710172 [PMID: 34899264]
  19. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Aug 15;60(4):337-43 [PMID: 16712801]
  20. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S454-66 [PMID: 22588766]
  21. Memory. 2020 Sep;28(8):1089-1103 [PMID: 32870127]
  22. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Feb;75:101807 [PMID: 31901881]
  23. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;40(1):39-49 [PMID: 18499085]
  24. Mol Psychiatry. 2015 Feb;20(2):224-31 [PMID: 24514568]
  25. Psychol Med. 2020 May;50(7):1173-1181 [PMID: 31120006]
  26. Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):223-32 [PMID: 20528050]
  27. J Anxiety Disord. 2021 Apr;79:102384 [PMID: 33774559]
  28. Behav Brain Res. 2019 May 17;364:256-263 [PMID: 30768997]
  29. Behav Res Ther. 2011 Jan;49(1):42-9 [PMID: 21051036]
  30. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Apr;99:311-328 [PMID: 30610911]
  31. Brain. 2006 Mar;129(Pt 3):564-83 [PMID: 16399806]
  32. Br J Clin Psychol. 1997 Feb;36(1):3-20 [PMID: 9051274]
  33. Entropy (Basel). 2022 Mar 11;24(3): [PMID: 35327901]
  34. J Psychiatr Res. 2021 May;137:554-571 [PMID: 33213890]
  35. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2017 Jul 30;265:87-97 [PMID: 28024845]
  36. Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 18;9(1):233 [PMID: 31534116]
  37. Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;204(1):61-8 [PMID: 24262816]
  38. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 18;111(11):3990-5 [PMID: 24591599]
  39. Front Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 11;9:431 [PMID: 30254588]
  40. Neuroimage. 2021 Nov;243:118503 [PMID: 34479041]
  41. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2016 Dec;53:68-74 [PMID: 26299890]
  42. Behav Res Ther. 2022 Mar;150:104034 [PMID: 35032701]
  43. J Clin Med. 2021 Jan 13;10(2): [PMID: 33451078]
  44. Front Neurosci. 2017 Oct 05;11:546 [PMID: 29051724]
  45. Psychol Med. 2000 Sep;30(5):1037-50 [PMID: 12027041]
  46. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Aug 4;53:149-55 [PMID: 24768985]
  47. Neuroimage. 2006 May 15;31(1):440-57 [PMID: 16466680]
  48. Bull Menninger Clin. 2020 Oct;84(Supplement A):34-47 [PMID: 33074021]
  49. Epigenetics. 2022 Jun;17(6):642-652 [PMID: 34269138]
  50. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;5(1):182-194 [PMID: 30237966]
  51. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;17(5):378-93 [PMID: 26642972]
  52. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;42(8):651-61 [PMID: 18622773]
  53. Schizophr Res. 2020 Jan;215:430-438 [PMID: 31439419]
  54. Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;205(5):376-82 [PMID: 25257066]
  55. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018 Apr;268(3):291-299 [PMID: 28353028]
  56. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Aug 9;20(9):68 [PMID: 30094516]
  57. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Jan 10;40:160-6 [PMID: 22996045]
  58. Psychol Med. 2021 Jan;51(1):70-82 [PMID: 31640827]
  59. Brain Imaging Behav. 2017 Oct;11(5):1326-1333 [PMID: 27730476]
  60. Behav Ther. 2016 Jul;47(4):550-9 [PMID: 27423170]
  61. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Oct 1;54(7):751-6 [PMID: 14512216]
  62. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 01;12:687062 [PMID: 34658945]
  63. Indian J Psychol Med. 2013 Jan;35(1):67-74 [PMID: 23833345]
  64. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;61(6):564-76 [PMID: 15184236]
  65. Neuron. 2013 Dec 18;80(6):1491-507 [PMID: 24290204]
  66. Psychol Med. 2021 Feb 09;:1-13 [PMID: 33557980]
  67. Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 15;80:360-78 [PMID: 23707587]
  68. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017 Jul 1;12(7):1149-1158 [PMID: 28338887]

Grants

  1. 81901390/N.L.
  2. SBK2015041859/N.L.
  3. BE2021616/N.Z.
  4. ZKX200029/N.L.
  5. NMUC2020034/N.Z. and N.L.

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0OCDcheckingwashinggyrusrightsubtypesfunctionalgroupdifferenceslocalbrainfrontaldisorderclinicalsymptomsymptomsneuralimagingpatientsHCsspontaneousactivityROCFCanalysisheterogeneitymechanismscompareregionalnetworkbasedresting-statemagneticresonancehealthycontrolsusedamongFurthermoreregionsfunctioningoccipitalcomparedmiddlecurverevealedBACKGROUND:Obsessive-compulsivepsychiatrichighmanifestedpresenceobsessionsand/orcompulsionsclassificationdimensionalhelpfulexplorationpathophysiologicalunderlyingWashingtwomajordifferenttypesyetclearlyunderstoodpurposestudyalterationsrs-fMRIMETHODS:total90subjectsincludedincluding153045RegionalhomogeneityReHothreegroupsindicatorsanalyzedreceiveroperatingcharacteristiccurvesmarkerspredictiondifferentlyactivatedareasinterestROIsexplorealteredconnectivityRESULTS:Extensiveabnormalitiesinvolvingtemporalobservedmainlyconcentratedbilateralsupramarginalangularinferiorhyperactivationbetterdiscriminatoryvalueseed-basedhigherleftmedialsuperiorcaudatenucleusCONCLUSIONS:findingssuggestextensiveexistintrinsicbasismayrelateddysfunctionfrontal-striataldistinguishesFunctionalConnectivitywithinFrontal-StriatalNetworkDifferentiatesCheckersWashersObsessive-CompulsiveDisorderobsessive-compulsive

Similar Articles

Cited By