Impacts of Incentive and Disincentive Mechanisms for Ensuring Environmentally Friendly Livestock Waste Management.

Deng Yue, Apurbo Sarkar, Chen Guang
Author Information
  1. Deng Yue: School of Management, Xi'an University of Science and Technology, Xi'an 710054, China.
  2. Apurbo Sarkar: College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, 3 Taicheng Road, Xianyang 712100, China.
  3. Chen Guang: College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, 3 Taicheng Road, Xianyang 712100, China. ORCID

Abstract

Environmentally friendly waste management (EFWM) is a safer way of waste disposal that can foster a cleaner environment for both farms and their surroundings. It may lessen land, air, and water pollution, as well as moderate ecological footprints, and aid in sustainable agricultural development, which has become one of the major concerns of the modern era. To achieve these outcomes, incentives and control mechanisms initiated by the government may alter farmers' behavior. The study involved a review of relevant literature and the conduct of interviews with 499 pig breeders to evaluate the impacts of government incentives and control mechanisms on fostering the adoption of environmentally friendly waste management practices by farmers. A theoretical framework based on existing studies is proposed, utilizing a structural equation modeling (SEM) approach to analyze the data and illustrate the relationships among incentives and control mechanisms. The results show that: (i) overall the impacts of incentive mechanisms were stronger and more effective than those of control mechanisms. Among them, subsidy policy and discount policy were the most influential for farmers' adoption behavior. However, penalty and disincentive policy also impacted the outcome variables; (ii) a significant relationship was observed among regulatory, disincentive, and subsidy policies and a moderate relationship among penalty, insurance, and discount policies. However, bonus-community service and social critic policies did not show any significant relationship with any other variables. The research findings can assist the Chinese government in gaining a comprehensive understanding of the impacts of two crucial mechanisms and promoting the adoption of environmentally friendly practices by farmers. The government should highlight and strengthen the importance of social obligations and orientation, as well as providing monetary support at the rural level to improve farmers' ability to adapt to environmentally friendly waste management practices.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Nov 15;795:148836 [PMID: 34237532]
  2. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2019 Nov 18;7(22):18359-18374 [PMID: 32983653]
  3. Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 17;11(1):5837 [PMID: 33203840]
  4. Nature. 2022 Mar;603(7901):450-454 [PMID: 35296848]
  5. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 10;11(11):e0166445 [PMID: 27832199]
  6. Nat Commun. 2021 May 26;12(1):3159 [PMID: 34039971]
  7. Nat Food. 2021 Jun;2(6):426-433 [PMID: 37118228]
  8. J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 1;301:113858 [PMID: 34607139]
  9. Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 26;10(1):1256 [PMID: 30914639]
  10. Waste Manag. 2021 Jun 1;128:232-242 [PMID: 34010789]
  11. Psychol Bull. 1959 Mar;56(2):81-105 [PMID: 13634291]
  12. Aust Crit Care. 2009 May;22(2):93-7 [PMID: 19150245]
  13. Bioresour Technol. 2009 Nov;100(22):5399-405 [PMID: 19179069]
  14. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jul 1;776:145928 [PMID: 33640543]
  15. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 16;16(8): [PMID: 31014019]
  16. Animals (Basel). 2022 Mar 16;12(6): [PMID: 35327144]
  17. Environ Res. 2022 Apr 15;206:112285 [PMID: 34710442]
  18. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021;164: [PMID: 33746361]
  19. Animals (Basel). 2022 Mar 19;12(6): [PMID: 35327172]
  20. J Anim Sci. 2004;82 E-Suppl:E196-206 [PMID: 15471798]
  21. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov 1;196(9):1152-1161 [PMID: 28489427]
  22. Poult Sci. 2008 Feb;87(2):380-6 [PMID: 18212385]
  23. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Jan;24(2):1469-1483 [PMID: 27783253]
  24. Nat Food. 2021 Oct;2(10):802-808 [PMID: 37117973]
  25. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021 Dec;175:1-13 [PMID: 35350408]
  26. One Health. 2021 Nov 03;13:100344 [PMID: 34805474]
  27. Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 22;9(1):4939 [PMID: 30467311]
  28. Waste Manag. 2017 Oct;68:636-645 [PMID: 28757220]
  29. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(14):18004-18020 [PMID: 33403639]

Grants

  1. Grant No: 42075172/the National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Grant No: 2018S04/the Shaanxi Philosophy and Social Science Fund Project

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mechanismsfriendlywastemanagementcontrolgovernmentenvironmentallyincentivesfarmers'impactsadoptionpracticesamongpolicyrelationshippoliciesEnvironmentallycanmaywellmoderatebehaviorfarmersstructuralequationmodelingSEMshowsubsidydiscountHoweverpenaltydisincentivevariablessignificantsocialEFWMsaferwaydisposalfostercleanerenvironmentfarmssurroundingslessenlandairwaterpollutionecologicalfootprintsaidsustainableagriculturaldevelopmentbecomeonemajorconcernsmoderneraachieveoutcomesinitiatedalterstudyinvolvedreviewrelevantliteratureconductinterviews499pigbreedersevaluatefosteringtheoreticalframeworkbasedexistingstudiesproposedutilizingapproachanalyzedataillustraterelationshipsresultsthat:overallincentivestrongereffectiveAmonginfluentialalsoimpactedoutcomeiiobservedregulatoryinsurancebonus-communityservicecriticresearchfindingsassistChinesegainingcomprehensiveunderstandingtwocrucialpromotinghighlightstrengthenimportanceobligationsorientationprovidingmonetarysupportrurallevelimproveabilityadaptImpactsIncentiveDisincentiveMechanismsEnsuringFriendlyLivestockWasteManagementChinacarbonemissionstechnologymanurereductiontechnologicalprogress

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)