A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Automated Cross-Preparation Diagnosis of Multi-Cell Liquid Pap Smear Images.

Yasmin Karasu Benyes, E Celeste Welch, Abhinav Singhal, Joyce Ou, Anubhav Tripathi
Author Information
  1. Yasmin Karasu Benyes: Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
  2. E Celeste Welch: Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
  3. Abhinav Singhal: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, I.I.T. Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India. ORCID
  4. Joyce Ou: Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
  5. Anubhav Tripathi: Center for Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

Abstract

Routine Pap smears can facilitate early detection of cervical cancer and improve patient outcomes. The objective of this work is to develop an automated, clinically viable deep neural network for the multi-class Bethesda System diagnosis of multi-cell images in Liquid Pap smear samples. 8 deep learning models were trained on a publicly available multi-class SurePath preparation dataset. This included the 5 best-performing transfer learning models, an ensemble, a novel convolutional neural network (CNN), and a CNN + autoencoder (AE). Additionally, each model was tested on a novel ThinPrep Pap dataset to determine model generalizability across different liquid Pap preparation methods with and without Deep CORAL domain adaptation. All models achieved accuracies >90% when classifying SurePath images. The AE CNN model, 99.80% smaller than the average transfer model, maintained an accuracy of 96.54%. During consecutive training attempts, individual transfer models had high variability in performance, whereas the CNN, AE CNN, and ensemble did not. ThinPrep Pap classification accuracies were notably lower but increased with domain adaptation, with ResNet101 achieving the highest accuracy at 92.65%. This indicates a potential area for future improvement: development of a globally relevant model that can function across different slide preparation methods.

Keywords

References

  1. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 10;11(1):16244 [PMID: 34376717]
  2. Sensors (Basel). 2019 Nov 12;19(22): [PMID: 31726762]
  3. Acta Cytol. 1995 Jan-Feb;39(1):55-60 [PMID: 7531380]
  4. Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 Sep 8;154(4):510-516 [PMID: 32637991]
  5. Acta Cytol. 2017;61(4-5):359-372 [PMID: 28693017]
  6. Cancer Cytopathol. 2011 Apr 25;119(2):77-9 [PMID: 21365777]
  7. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2009 Dec;133(12):1912-6 [PMID: 19961244]
  8. Tissue Cell. 2020 Aug;65:101347 [PMID: 32746984]
  9. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2019 Mar;72:13-21 [PMID: 30763802]
  10. Artif Intell Med. 2008 Jan;42(1):1-11 [PMID: 17996432]
  11. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-e203 [PMID: 31812369]
  12. J R Soc Interface. 2018 Apr;15(141): [PMID: 29618526]
  13. Acta Cytol. 2017;61(4-5):266-280 [PMID: 28384641]
  14. Diagn Cytopathol. 1998 Jul 1;19(1):70-4 [PMID: 9664189]
  15. Nat Commun. 2021 Sep 24;12(1):5639 [PMID: 34561435]
  16. Artif Intell Med. 2020 Jul;107:101897 [PMID: 32828445]
  17. Cancer. 2006 Jun 25;108(3):144-9 [PMID: 16550571]
  18. J Big Data. 2021;8(1):101 [PMID: 34306963]
  19. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Oct;164:15-22 [PMID: 30195423]
  20. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2015 May;26(5):1019-34 [PMID: 25014970]
  21. Data Brief. 2020 Apr 22;30:105589 [PMID: 32368601]
  22. Cancer. 2004 Oct 25;102(5):269-79 [PMID: 15386329]
  23. Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Jan;27(1):15-25 [PMID: 26458884]
  24. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 9;11(1):16143 [PMID: 34373589]
  25. J Big Data. 2021;8(1):53 [PMID: 33816053]

Grants

  1. N/A/PerkinElmer (United States)

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PapCNNmodelmodelsneuralpreparationtransferAEcancervicalcancerdeepnetworkmulti-classimagesLiquidlearningSurePathdatasetensemblenovelThinPrepacrossdifferentmethodsDeepdomainadaptationaccuraciesaccuracyclassificationRoutinesmearsfacilitateearlydetectionimprovepatientoutcomesobjectiveworkdevelopautomatedclinicallyviableBethesdaSystemdiagnosismulti-cellsmearsamples8trainedpubliclyavailableincluded5best-performingconvolutional+autoencoderAdditionallytesteddeterminegeneralizabilityliquidwithoutCORALachieved>90%classifying9980%smalleraveragemaintained9654%consecutivetrainingattemptsindividualhighvariabilityperformancewhereasnotablylowerincreasedResNet101achievinghighest9265%indicatespotentialareafutureimprovement:developmentgloballyrelevantfunctionslideComparativeAnalysisLearningModelsAutomatedCross-PreparationDiagnosisMulti-CellSmearImagesartificialintelligenceimagemedicaldiagnosticimagingnetworks

Similar Articles

Cited By (8)